USIP has been conducting innovative research on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan about the challenges and opportunities in a peace process for Afghanistan. On June 13, 2011, USIP hosted a discussion about what the key research findings suggest about how to move toward a durable peace.

 

Momentum is growing among international and Afghan actors to support a peace process in Afghanistan. However, ambiguities remain in the US political and military strategies, the ability of the Afghan government to successfully lead a peace process, insurgent interest in such a process, and in the interest and ability of regional actors to support a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

On June 13, USIP hosted a lively two-part discussion on how to achieve a durable peace in Afghanistan within the context of existing uncertainties and variables.

The first panel drew in part from the findings of an ongoing USIP research project in Pakistan compiling the views of Pakistani opinion-makers on the endgame in Afghanistan to discuss the role regional actors may play both publicly and behind the scenes in a peace process.

The second panel introduced and discussed the key findings from a series of 120-plus interviews with a cross-cutting segment of Afghan leaders and opinion-makers about the inherent challenges to a peace process. This unique and inclusive set of interviews was conducted in the context of an ongoing project by USIP, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), and the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) to identify issues and options to help Afghanistan move toward sustainable peace.

The findings, including views on the future of US presence in the country and on reforming Afghanistan's political structures, are also reviewed in a USIP Peace Brief and a joint USIP-PRIO-CMI working paper.

Featuring:

  • Andrew Exum, panelist
    Fellow
    Center for a New American Security
  • Kristian Harpviken, remarks
    Director
    Peace Research Institute Oslo
  • Ali Jalali, panelist
    Distinguished Professor, National Defense University; and
    former Minister of the Interior, Government of Afghanistan
  • Hamish Nixon, panelist
    Project Coordinator
    United States Institute of Peace / Peace Research Institute Oslo
  • Hasina Safi, panelist
    Executive Director
    Afghan Women's Education Center
  • Michael Semple, panelist
    Fellow
    Carr Center for Human Rights Policy
  • Vikram Singh, remarks
    Deputy Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan
    Department of State
  • Fatema Sumar, remarks
    Professional Staff Member
    U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee
  • William B. Taylor, moderator
    Senior Vice President, Center for Conflict Management
    United States Institute of Peace
  • Ashley Tellis, panelist
    Senior Associate, South Asia Program
    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  • Andrew Wilder, remarks and moderator
    Director, Afghanistan and Pakistan Programs
    United States Institute of Peace
  • Moeed Yusuf, panelist
    South Asia Adviser
    United States Institute of Peace

 

VIEW THE EVENT AGENDA

Explore Further

 

Related Academy Courses:

Related Publications

At SCO, Pakistan Promotes Relevance as China Projects Influence

At SCO, Pakistan Promotes Relevance as China Projects Influence

Thursday, October 24, 2024

Last week, Pakistan hosted leaders from China, Russia, India, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Iran and Belarus for the 23rd Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit. While the lead-up to the summit highlighted the constraints that Pakistan’s internal troubles place on its ability to play an active role in global diplomacy, Islamabad was able to sidestep any serious diplomatic faux pas. India’s attendance may have left a door cracked to dialogue between Pakistan and its neighboring rival.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Will the IMF’s $7 Billion Bailout Stabilize Pakistan’s Economy?

Will the IMF’s $7 Billion Bailout Stabilize Pakistan’s Economy?

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has approved a $7 billion loan for Pakistan aimed at helping the South Asian nation stabilize its economy. After assuming power earlier this year, Pakistan’s new coalition government led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) had approached the IMF for the 25th time for a loan. On September 12, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said his country had met all the conditions set by the IMF to qualify for a new loan. And on September 25, the IMF signed a formal approval of the loan.

Type: Question and Answer

Economics

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

View All Publications