Extremist violence and growing radicalization continue to present a serious challenge to Pakistan’s stability. As efforts to counter violent extremism grow in prominence, the drivers of radicalization and extremism and the means to undercut these drivers remain inadequately understood. On May 9, USIP convened a panel of experts on radicalization for a discussion examining what drives radicalization, and how to address these drivers through strategies to counter violent extremism.

Read the event coverage, The Challenges of Countering Radicalization in Pakistan

20120509-CounteringRadicalizationinPakistan-N

In March 2012 alone, Pakistan experienced 113 reported terrorist/insurgent attacks, resulting in 136 deaths and 185 injuries. Underpinning this violence is the growing radicalization among Pakistani youth which, while not always manifesting itself violently, presents a somber potential future indicator.

As the narrative emergent from Pakistan continues to be dominated by this steady march of violence and growing radicalization, counterterrorism research increasingly points to the need for broader and longer-term approaches to stemming terrorism/insurgency. In the U.S. and elsewhere, experts are turning to countering violent extremism (CVE), conceptualized by some as the means to undercut the ideological and rhetorical narratives which drive violent extremism. Counter-radicalization and de-radicalization measures are receiving more focus as an aspect of a holistic approach aimed specifically at those who may have already drifted towards extremist ranks. Pakistan’s first major attempt at this in recent years is the Sabaoon project, which works to de-radicalize young men who were part of the Pakistani Taliban that captured the Swat Valley in 2007.

On May 9, USIP convened a panel examining the CVE challenge in the Pakistani context. The event featured clips from a forthcoming documentary on the Sabaoon project and a talk by the project’s director, Dr. Feriha Peracha, as part of a broader discussion on CVE approaches in Pakistan which included experts on the psychology of extremism as well as on U.S. efforts at CVE.

USIP’s on-the-ground work in Pakistan in part addresses how to counter violent extremism through media interventions, work with civil society organizations, and research on the drivers of and response options to extremism. 

This event featured the following speakers:

  • Dr. Arie Kruglanski, panelist
    Distinguished Professor of Psychology
    University of Maryland
  • Vice Admiral Michael LeFever, panelist
    Deputy Director for Strategic Operational Planning
    U.S. National Counter Terrorism Center
  • Dr. Feriha Peracha, panelist
    Director and Supervising Psychologist
    Sabaoon School, Pakistan
  • Moeed Yusuf, moderator
    South Asia Adviser
    United States Institute of Peace

Explore Further

 Related Academy Courses

 

Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications