The Kuwaiti Ambassador in Washington, Dr. Mohammed Al-Sabah, argued that a strengthened regime of economic sanctions that are "regime lethal" represent the best strategy to confront Saddam Hussein. The ambassador made his remarks at a public event attended by some fifty journalists and policy experts at USIP's offices on December 4.

Ambassador Al-Sabah began his discussion by outlining the ways in which Saddam Hussein is a menace: to his own people, to his neighbors, to security in the Persian Gulf, and to the credibility of the international system.

Kuwaiti Ambassador to the U.S. Dr. Mohammed Al-Sabah
Kuwaiti Ambassador to the U.S. Dr. Mohammed Al-Sabah.

He then outlined the five basic options available to the international community. The first, maintaining the status quo, Al-Sabah rejected as unacceptable and unsustainable. The second, known as "containment-plus," would involve a less intrusive weapons monitoring regime but a clear and vigorous use of force in the event of Iraqi transgressions. Al-Sabah argued that "containment-plus," though initially attractive, is unsustainable in the long term.

Al-Sabah viewed the third option, support for the Iraqi opposition, as impractical. The opposition is currently fragmented, weak and dispersed, he said, and a serious program of support would require vast amounts of cash and regional support which are currently lacking. Finally, the opposition has been thoroughly infiltrated by Iraqi intelligence organizations.

Fourth, Al-Sabah addressed the possibility of weakening the regime by lifting sanctions. Supporters of this move argue that rather than weaken the regime, sanctions have entrenched it because they empower the government by allowing it to control access to needed commodities. Sanctions, this argument goes, have destroyed the Iraqi middle class and created a captive society. Sanctions have also protected Iraq from invasion by Iran, since smuggling profits and payoffs enrich security officials on both sides of the Iran-Iraq border. Ultimately, however, Al-Sabah judged such a strategy as too dangerous because Saddam could rebuild his weapons of mass destruction programs in a few short months.

Zalmay Khalilzad of RAND poses a question to Ambassador Al-Sabah.
Zalmay Khalilzad of RAND poses a question to Ambassador Al-Sabah.

Instead, Al-Sabah argued for a fifth option, making the sanctions "regime lethal." He outlined four steps to achieve that goal: denying the regime the fruits of smuggling, ending government control over food distribution and its consequent enhancement of state power, denying the regime any aura of respectability in the world community, and continuously degrading the Iraqi regime's pillars of power. The latter would be achieved by targeting Saddam's security apparatus in any future allied attacks against the Iraqi regime.

In a question-and-answer period that followed the ambassador's talk, most of the discussion centered on how to create an effective sanctions regime despite the many obstacles that exist. Ambassador Al-Sabah maintained that with a great deal of will, and the cooperation of the Iranian government, such a regime could be established. Al-Sabah also distanced himself from the idea of supporting Iraqi opposition forces on Kuwaiti soil, arguing that "Kuwait cannot interfere intrusively into the internal affairs of Iraq."

Speakers

  • Dr. Mohammed Al-Sabah
    Kuwaiti Ambassador

Media Inquiries

Please contact Ian Larsen (+1.202.429.3870) or Lauren Sucher (+1.202.429.3822) in the Office of Public Affairs and Communications.

Latest Publications

India Elections: Foreign Policy Rhetoric Mixes Bluster and Real Differences

India Elections: Foreign Policy Rhetoric Mixes Bluster and Real Differences

Monday, May 20, 2024

Historically, foreign policy has rarely been a core area for political debate in India’s national elections. This year, the BJP is again widely anticipated to win a parliamentary majority, however, as hundreds of millions of Indian voters head to the polls, both Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the opposition INDIA alliance, headed by the Congress Party’s Rahul Gandhi, have made a point to highlight their differences on several high-profile national security issues.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & Conflict

In Europe, Xi Looks to Boost Ties — and Sow Divisions

In Europe, Xi Looks to Boost Ties — and Sow Divisions

Thursday, May 16, 2024

Chinese leader Xi Jinping last week made his first trip to the European continent in five years, visiting France, Hungary and Serbia. In Paris, Xi faced tough questions over trade and China’s support for Russia and its war in Ukraine, but met a much friendlier reception in Budapest and Belgrade, both of which view China as a key economic and political partner. Still, the visit demonstrated the obstacles Beijing faces in fostering deeper ties across Europe, where resentment is simmering over China’s moral and materiel aid to Russia and what Europe views as unfair trade practices.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Traumatic Decarbonization in Fragile States

Traumatic Decarbonization in Fragile States

Wednesday, May 15, 2024

The process of decarbonization—that is, the replacement of fossil fuels with non-hydrocarbon-based forms of energy—is essential for meeting the climate goals articulated by international agreements. But in fragile, oil-dependent nations, where hydrocarbon revenues are often a key means of political control, decarbonization can spell the difference between peace and conflict. This report examines the consequences of the sudden loss of oil revenues for fragile, conflict-affected states and provides recommendations for policymakers on how to manage future decarbonization peacefully.

Type: Peaceworks

Conflict Analysis & PreventionEconomicsEnvironmentFragility & Resilience

China’s Edge in the Pacific Islands: Xi Jinping Makes Time for Leaders

China’s Edge in the Pacific Islands: Xi Jinping Makes Time for Leaders

Wednesday, May 15, 2024

If the U.S. government wants an edge over China in the Pacific Islands, it needs to facilitate more meetings between the president of the United States and regional leaders, preferably one-on-one. When Pacific Island leaders fly to Beijing, they often have a one-on-one meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, but such a meeting between the leader of a Pacific Island country and a sitting president of the United States has never taken place. The White House has only conducted joint meetings with Pacific Island leaders. Sometimes even joint meetings don’t make the cut.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications