For this second annual conference on conflict prevention, USIP brought together experts and policymakers to discuss challenges and opportunities for conflict prevention around the world. The goals of this conference were to spotlight the importance of prevention, discuss specific challenges facing prevention efforts, and identify priority areas for USIP's future work on conflict prevention.

Read the event coverage, Peace: Trending Positive

USIP's second annual conference on Preventing Violent Conflict brought together experts and policymakers to discuss challenges and opportunities for conflict prevention around the world. Almost 200 leading policymakers, scholars, diplomats, and nongovernmental organization leaders participated in this all-day conference.

The keynote address was delivered by Gareth Evans, chancellor of the Australian National University and former Australian minister of foreign affairs. The first panel highlighted the potential conflicts at risk of breaking out in various regions. This year's conference also included four concurrent break-out sessions allowing participants to discuss specific challenges facing conflict prevention efforts. The afternoon panel reflected on global conflict prevention initiatives by the U.S. government, the United Nations, and civil society.

One of the goals of this event was to identify priority areas for USIP's future work on conflict prevention. Recommendations for USIP included the development of a guidebook allowing practitioners to apply prevention tools, and research quantifying the costs and benefits of conflict prevention. The U.S. government should channel resources for prevention at an early stage of conflict, and systematically include a gender perspective when analyzing conflict and engaging in conflict resolution efforts.

We look forward to welcoming everybody at USIP's third annual conference in June next year.

See the keynote address by Prof. Gareth Evans, as well as the remarks from Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs, Maria Otero. 

See the info and guiding questions for the Panel Discussions and the Break-Out Sessions. This Peace Brief provides an overview of last year's discussions. | Sign up to receive USIP’s bimonthly Conflict Prevention Newsletter via e-mail.
 

Agenda

 

09:00am | Welcome and Introduction

09:15am | Keynote Address

  • The Hon. Gareth Evans, Chancellor, Australian National University

10:00am | Panel 1: Regional Challenges

11:45pm | Lunch Break (lunch will be provided to participants)

12:45pm | Break-Out Sessions

  • The Prevention of Electoral Violence: Facilitator: Dorina Bekoe, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Women and Conflict: Facilitator: Kathleen Kuehnast, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Making the Case for Prevention: Facilitator: Mary Stata, Friends Committee on National Legislation
  • The Conflict Prevention Toolbox: Facilitator: Lawrence Woocher, U.S. Institute of Peace

2:15pm | Break



 

2:30pm | Presentation of Take-Aways by Facilitators of Break-Out Sessions

3:00pm | Panel 2: Global Conflict Prevention Initiatives

  • Dr. Paula Dobriansky, Chair
    Senior Fellow, Harvard University, and Distinguished National Security Chair, U.S. Naval Academy
  • Ms. Nancy Lindborg
    Assistant Administrator, USAID
  • Ms. Maria Otero
    Under Secretary, U.S. Department of State
  • Mr. Jordan Ryan
    Assistant Administrator and Director, UNDP
  • Mr. Mark Schneider
    Senior Vice President, International Crisis Group

4:45-5:15pm | Conclusion

Related Academy Courses

Related Publications

China’s Dilemmas Deepen as North Korea Enters Ukraine War

China’s Dilemmas Deepen as North Korea Enters Ukraine War

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Until late October, the big questions about China’s role in the Ukraine conflict centered around whether Beijing would choose to expand its support for Russia to include lethal aid, or if it might engage in more active peacemaking to end the conflict. Then, on November 4, the Pentagon confirmed that North Korea sent more than 10,000 troops to Russia’s Kursk oblast, where Ukraine had captured some territory earlier this year. Days later, the State Department confirmed that North Korean soldiers had begun fighting Ukrainian troops.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

The Ukraine war is taking a new turn with the involvement of North Korean soldiers. Washington estimates that, so far, North Korea has sent approximately 10,000 troops to Russia — around 8,000 of whom have been deployed to the western region of Kursk, where Ukraine seized territory in a surprise attack earlier this year. And as U.S. officials predicted in late October, North Korean troops have reportedly begun engaging in direct combat.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Russia’s war against Ukraine has spurred closer cooperation between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific states and organizations, particularly Australia and NATO, signaling a deepening of ties that could have long-term benefits for global security. Over the long term, writes security expert Gorana Grgić, such alignment is crucial for signaling to potential aggressors that global coalitions are prepared to respond. This report analyzes Australia’s response in order to examine Canberra’s strategic thinking with respect to cross-theater cooperation, and it offers recommendations for US, NATO, and Australian policymakers.

Type: Special Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would be an extremely difficult military, complex operation. China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been thinking seriously since the early 2000s about what such a landing would require. For over two decades, its force development efforts have been focused on the weapons, equipment, doctrine and operational concepts required to conquer the island in the face of full U.S. military intervention. The PLA has made considerable progress toward that goal and may deem itself fully capable by the 2027 force development target set by Xi Jinping.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications