Should governments negotiate with terrorist groups? If so, when is the right time? How can policymakers understand various factors, such as group leadership, public support and splintering, that have vital impacts on the outcome of negotiating with terrorist groups? These questions are asked more and more often by policymakers and politicians the world over.

Should governments negotiate with terrorist groups? If so, when is the right time? How can policymakers understand various factors, such as group leadership, public support and splintering, that have vital impacts on the outcome of negotiating with terrorist groups? These questions are asked more and more often by policymakers and politicians the world over.

The conversation was framed around Dr. Audrey Kurth Cronin’s recent USIP Special Report, "When Should We Talk to Terrorists?" The findings of this report are drawn from a larger USIP-supported multiyear research project on how terrorist campaigns meet their demise, which culminated in Dr. Cronin’s book, "How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns."

 The speakers addressed the "if, when and how" questions of negotiating with terrorist groups from both academic and policy standpoints.  The panel drew from a number of contemporary examples, such as Afghanistan, as well as provide an interdisciplinary approach to the topic. Copies of Dr. Cronin’s report, along with several other pertinent USIP publications, were available at the event.
 
Speakers:
  • Audrey Kurth Cronin, Panelist
    Professor, National Defense University
  • Peter Bergen, Panelist
    Co-Director of the Counterterrorism Strategy Initiative, New America Foundation
  • Anthony Wanis St.-John, Panelist
    Assistant Professor, School of International Service, American University
    Adviser to the Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • I. William Zartman, Panelist
    Professor Emeritus, School of Advanced International Studes, Johns Hopkins University
  • Paul R. Pillar, Moderator
    Director of Graduate Studies, Center for Peace and Security Studies, Georgetown University
  • Senior Program Officer, Grant Program, U.S. Institute of Peace

Multimedia

Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications