In 2022, the U.S. Institute of Peace convened a senior study group to examine the evolving threat landscape and counterterrorism challenges in South Asia. The bipartisan study group brought together experts of counterterrorism strategy, diplomacy, intelligence and South Asia to assess terrorism risks from Afghanistan and Pakistan and put forth policy options for future counterterrorism efforts in the region.

When announcing the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical U.S. national security interest. To support this priority, USIP brought together a group of bipartisan experts on counterterrorism and South Asia to assess terrorist threats from South and Central Asia, as well as propose policy options that could help mitigate threats and safeguard U.S. interests while being compatible with the overall U.S. policy focus on strategic competition.

USIP Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan

The USIP Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan evaluated threats from Afghanistan and Pakistan and developed options for a sustainable counterterrorism strategy that could effectively mitigate existing threats, especially those directed against the U.S. homeland and its allies and partners. While reflecting on the past 20 years of counterterrorism efforts in the region, the group also evaluated tradeoffs of counterterrorism policy options and strategic competition.

The study group came to two main conclusions on the stakes and direction of the terrorist threat and the strategic policy options for the United States. First, rather than considering counterterrorism as an unwelcome distraction from strategic competition, policymakers could recalibrate their focus on counterterrorism to mitigate threats and shield the strategic competition agenda.

A potential terrorist attack would be costly for U.S. strategic interests — risking a tragic loss of life, as well as a shock that could divert U.S. resources and attention away from other national security interests, particularly the Indo-Pacific Strategy. Attacks against U.S. allies and partners also risk undermining U.S. assurances and sparking a wider escalation in the region.

The second conclusion that the study group reached is that terrorist threats to U.S. interests from Afghanistan and Pakistan are steadily rising — and Afghanistan presents growing space for terrorist groups compared to the period before the U.S. withdrawal. ISIS-K presents a rising threat with reach beyond the immediate region, greater than during the pre-withdrawal period. The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) terrorist group has also returned as a regional security threat. While the worst-case scenario concerning al-Qaeda’s reconstitution in Afghanistan has not materialized, that group and its South Asia affiliate continue to maintain ties with and receive support from the Taliban and to call for attacks against U.S. citizens, allies, partners (including India) and U.S. interests. In addition, the Taliban’s provision of sanctuary to terrorist groups and their promotion of extremist ideologies also present a counterterrorism challenge.

Based on these two conclusions, the study group’s final report evaluated and put forth policy options to mitigate terrorist threats and safeguard U.S. interests in Afghanistan and Pakistan, while maintaining the current focus on strategic competition.

Final Report of the USIP Senior Study Group

Senior Study Group Members

Senior Study Group Members

Laurel Miller, Co-chair
The Asia Foundation

Lieutenant General (Ret.) Michael K. Nagata, Co-chair
U.S. Army

Dr. Tricia Bacon
American University

Shamila Chaudhary
Formerly National Security Council

Dr. Brian Finucane
International Crisis Group

Major General (Ret.) Robin Fontes
U.S. Army

Larry Henderson
Arcanum Global

Dr. Colin Jackson
U.S. Naval War College

Dr. Carter Malkasian
Naval Post Graduate School

Ambassador (Ret.) P. Michael McKinley
Center for Strategic and International Studies

Ambassador (Ret.) Anne Patterson
Yale Jackson School of International Affairs

Dr. Andrew Radin
RAND Corporation

Andrew Watkins
U.S. Institute of Peace

Dr. Joshua White
Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies

Scott Worden
U.S. Institute of Peace

Katherine Zimmerman
Irregular Warfare Initiative

Tamanna Salikuddin, Senior Study Group Executive Director
Director, South Asia Programs, U.S. Institute of Peace

Dr. Asfandyar Mir, Senior Study Group Director
Senior Expert, South Asia, U.S. Institute of Peace

Staff Support

Isha Gupta
U.S. Institute of Peace

Maximilien Mellott
Formerly U.S. Institute of Peace

Amna Rana
U.S. Institute of Peace

Brigitta Schuchert
U.S. Institute of Peace

Dante Schulz
U.S. Institute of Peace

Featured Resources

A view of Kanai, one of four Afghan villages hit in April by Pakistani airstrikes, April 16, 2022. (The New York Times)

Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan

Event

On May 14, USIP launched the final report of the Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The conversation looked at lessons learned from 20 years of U.S. counterterrorism efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan as well as examined a forward looking, cost-effective and sustainable approach for U.S. counterterrorism policy.

More than 250 Islamic State fighters turn themselves in to the Afghan government to avoid imminent capture by Taliban insurgents, in Sheberghan, Afghanistan, Aug. 1, 2018. (Najim Rahim/The New York Times)

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Question and Answer

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant.

Two Taliban fighters-turned-policemen at their police post in Kabul, Afghanistan. July 23, 2023. (Jim Huylebroek/The New York Times)

Two Years Under the Taliban: Is Afghanistan a Terrorist Safe Haven Once Again?

Analysis

Two years into Taliban rule, the question of whether Afghanistan would once again become a safe haven for international terrorism remains alive. Longstanding fears were affirmed a little over a year ago, when the U.S. government located al-Qaeda leader Aimen al-Zawahiri in Kabul, Afghanistan, before killing him in a drone strike.

On Peace podcast logo

Asfandyar Mir on Why ISIS-K Attacked Moscow

Podcast

ISIS-K’s recent attack on the Russian capital was, in part, intended to assert the organization’s growing capacity to inflict terror beyond its home base of Afghanistan. “By reaching Moscow, ISIS-K is trying to signal it has the geographic reach to hit anywhere in the world,” says USIP’s Asfandyar Mir.

People fill the Bibi Fatima Mosque in Kandahar, Afghanistan, on October 18, 2021, after a deadly attack claimed by Islamic State Khorasan Province. (Photo by Jim Huylebroek/New York Times)

The Growing Threat of the Islamic State in Afghanistan and South Asia

Special Report

When the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 2021, counterterrorism experts were alarmed at the possible resurgence of Islamist terrorist groups within the country. This Special Report lays out why those concerns, particularly about the regional Islamic State affiliate known as Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP), were well-founded.