In the last of a five-part series of papers and meetings on “Reshaping the Strategic Culture of the Middle East,” regional specialist Adeed Dawisha told an audience at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) on June 12 that, contrary to some expectations, no clear political or ideological breach has opened up between the revolutionary states of the Arab Spring and the region’s status quo powers.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/jordanzakarin/turkish-protestor-chorus-sings-les-mis

The Arab Spring has produced “little palpable change” so far in spreading “robust democratic structures” throughout the region, said Dawisha, a political scientist at Miami University in Ohio and author most recently of “The Second Arab Awakening: Revolution, Democracy, and the Islamist Challenge from Tunis to Damascus.” Dawisha’s paper has been published jointly by USIP and the Middle East program at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars; as with other papers in the series, its views are his own and not those of either institution.

“If there was any fear [by status quo powers] that the events of the spring of 2011 would tilt the strategic balance in the direction of the revolutionary states…that concern must have subsided considerably by the spring of 2013,” Dawisha writes in his paper.

At the USIP meeting, he said it would be “a little harsh” to describe the Arab Spring, also known as the Arab Awakening, as exerting no impact on political change outside of the revolutionary countries. He noted political reforms in three countries. Morocco’s constitution was revised, with the king ceding some of his powers to parliament. Jordan’s king encouraged reforms, leading to an independent electoral commission. Even in Saudi Arabia, women were granted the right to vote in the upcoming 2015 municipal elections, and some took seats in the kingdom’s Consultative Council.

But overall, Dawisha suggested that to date the Arab Awakening has been more successful at transferring political violence and sectarianism than democratic reform. “There have been some changes. These are really anemic changes compared to the hopes people had in the Arab revolutions,” he said. “The kings and emirs of status quo powers needn’t lie awake at night.”

In his paper, Dawisha writes that “any reform undertaken by Arab kings was born out of fear of the idea of freedom, which of late had become far more incendiary and much more contaminating than in the past because of the extraordinary advances in the fields of communications and information technology.” But Dawisha states that the region is lacking a “positive ‘demonstration effect’”—a “democratic success, preferably fortified by palpable economic growth…that would either ignite democratic revolutions in the status quo countries or, at a minimum, force the recalcitrant authoritarian leaders of these countries to embark on a process of meaningful liberal reforms.”

Though longtime dictators were deposed in Libya and Yemen, tribal and regional loyalties are stymieing political compromise, and state institutions have been unable to establish political control over armed groups, Dawisha writes. In Syria, a peaceful uprising has turned into a bloody civil war, and the country “is being torn apart.” And while Tunisia will be recalled as the birthplace of the Arab Awakening, he notes, the would-be demonstration effect of a democratic Egypt—a country long seen as the heart of the Arab world—has been tempered by two Islamist parties, including the governing Freedom and Justice Party, whose leader and the country’s president, Mohamed Morsi, has shown what Dawisha calls “authoritarian proclivities.” Morsi unilaterally decreed new powers for himself, and the writing of a new constitution fell to Islamists. They have been reluctant to compromise with secularists and have been attacking laws that instituted protections for women’s rights, Dawisha writes.

Dawisha added that some of the post-revolutionary Arab states are also “living off the largesse from the status quo powers” as their transitions continue. In his paper, Dawisha notes that since Morsi came to power Egypt has received $8 billion from Qatar and is expecting $4 billion from Iraq and $2.5 billion from Saudi Arabia. “It is difficult to bite the hand that is feeding you,” he said at the June 12 meeting.

Iran has benefitted strategically amid the Arab Spring, Dawisha said, and it is aiming to build new, closer ties to parts of the Arab world. In particular, Iran and Egypt are attempting to “create some kind of alliance” to the disadvantage of the United States, a shift that did not occur under the long rule of former Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak, he said.

The Egyptian outreach to Iran, led by Morsi, “represents a real policy option” for Cairo, he added. “There is no love lost between the Islamists and the Americans,” he said. However, there are factors constraining the new relationship: Egypt’s Islamists “abhor” the Shiite creed of Iran, meaning that warmer Egyptian-Iranian relations are likely to “grow in a way of not much importance” to the United States, Dawisha said.

Further resources:


Related Publications

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

For over three decades, every Chinese foreign minister’s first overseas trip of the year has been to Africa. This year continued the tradition with China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, visiting Egypt, Tunisia, Togo and Côte d'Ivoire. Notably, every one of these countries is coastal. And yet, at a time of continued speculation over China’s next military installation in Africa, none of these countries has featured prominently as potential locations in previous analyses. We might, therefore, reasonably ask what China’s current considerations are around basing in Africa. Faced with an increasingly multipolar and assertive Africa at a time of domestic economic challenge, however, China’s long-term strategy remains unclear.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

The Current Situation in Tunisia

The Current Situation in Tunisia

Wednesday, September 27, 2023

Tunisia’s transition to democracy remains incomplete and under stress. Since the presidential measures to suspend the parliament, dismiss the government and draft a new constitution were enacted in 2021, socioeconomic conditions have continued to deteriorate, and risks of unrest have increased. Meanwhile, the ambitions of the 2011 revolution for rule of law, accountability, economic prosperity and human dignity are far from being realized. USIP works with Tunisians to improve national and local governance and security, rebuild trust and strengthen civil society.

Type: Fact Sheet

Overcoming the Challenges of Transitional Mobilization

Overcoming the Challenges of Transitional Mobilization

Tuesday, May 30, 2023

Nonviolent action can be a powerful way to bring about peaceful transitions from autocratic rule to democracy. But even when initially successful, movement leaders often face significant challenges, from frustrations that grievances are not addressed quickly enough to counterrevolutions aimed at restoring the authoritarian status quo. This report examines two recent transitions—the 2011 Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia and Armenia’s 2018 Velvet Revolution—and presents recommendations for improving the likelihood that change initiated through nonviolent action leads to robust and lasting democracy.

Type: Peaceworks

Nonviolent Action

View All Publications