Iranian President Hassan Rouhani won a decisive victory for a second four-year term, with more than 41 million of 56.4 million eligible voters casting ballots, and 57 percent granting him their vote. But his platform of loosening political restrictions at home and greater engagement abroad will face challenges domestically and internationally.

President Rouhani

Under Iran’s political system, matters of state are ultimately decided by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic for nearly three decades. Consequently, elections in Iran might be dismissed as meaningless and futile exercises offering little in the way of meaningful sociopolitical change. The institutional constrains are real, and the spectrum of permitted views undoubtedly restricted.

Nevertheless, the presidency does wield varying degrees of influence on matters of economic, social, cultural and foreign policy. Rouhani and Ebrahim Raisi, his main rival in the race, offered contrasting visions within that spectrum for the May 19 election. Raisi, a conservative whose populist message aimed at winning votes from the lower classes and religious conservatives, finished with 15.8 million votes, or 38.5 percent.

Having secured the nuclear deal with the U.S. and five other world powers during his first term, an important challenge for Rouhani in the second will be to better leverage its benefits into tangible financial gains that trickle down to Iran’s population. Many international sanctions against the Islamic Republic were lifted as a result of the agreement, and Rouhani’s administration has reinvigorated Iran’s crucial oil exports, while taming rampant inflation down to single digits. But unemployment has grown worse, and the presidential hopefuls argued in various measures that they could create millions of new jobs, tackle corruption, increase government handouts and help Iran’s poor.

In the final days of the campaign, Rouhani launched broadsides against key hardline institutions such as state media and the Revolutionary Guards. He clearly was trying to rally supporters of key reformist figures such as former President Mohammad Khatami and get them to the ballot box.

Yet Rouhani’s pledges that “we want freedom of press, freedom of association and freedom of thought” are going to be tested by continuing strong conservative currents. How Rouhani navigates his relationship with the Supreme Leader, and with other key players such as the Revolutionary Guards, will be crucial in developing and implementing the President’s agenda writ large.

On foreign policy, Rouhani can be expected to continue Iran’s slow but steady efforts at increasing trade and improving the country’s international standing. But Tehran’s role in Syria and elsewhere in its immediate neighborhood leaves deep concern in Washington and among U.S. allies in the region, notably Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s statement on Saturday in response to the election drew attention to issues such as Iran’s continued missile tests and support for a “network of terrorism” and for “destabilizing forces” in  the Middle East. And President Donald Trump, in a speech to leaders of majority-Muslim nations in Riyadh today, denounced Iran from a platform provided by its arch-rival in the region, Saudi Arabia.

With the nuclear agreement and the Trump administration’s wider Iran policy under ongoing review, Rouhani’s stated goal of “lifting all the non-nuclear sanctions” against Tehran remains a tall order.


Related Publications

Iran’s Attack and the New Escalatory Cycle in the Middle East

Iran’s Attack and the New Escalatory Cycle in the Middle East

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

The Middle East is entering a new phase after unprecedented attacks by Israel and Iran during the first two weeks of April. Robin Wright, a senior fellow at USIP and the Woodrow Wilson Center who has covered the region for a half century, explores what happened, the strategic implications, the political context and the divided world reaction.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The Growing Flashpoints Between the U.S. and Iran

The Growing Flashpoints Between the U.S. and Iran

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

Tension between Washington and Tehran has been a growing undercurrent of the war in Gaza, even as both countries tried to prevent it from sparking a direct confrontation during the first six months of fighting. Robin Wright, a joint fellow at USIP and the Wilson Center, explores the evolving flashpoints in the world’s most volatile region as well as the challenges for U.S. diplomacy, the new triggers for a wider regional conflagration and the historical backdrop.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The United States Weighs Its Options in the Face of Iran’s Provocations

The United States Weighs Its Options in the Face of Iran’s Provocations

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

Three U.S. troops were killed and at least 34 injured in a drone strike on a U.S. base in northeast Jordan on January 28. The attack comes against a backdrop of rising regional tensions since the outbreak of conflict in Gaza following the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel.

Type: AnalysisQuestion and Answer

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal PolicyViolent Extremism

Making Sense of Iran-Pakistan Cross-Border Strikes

Making Sense of Iran-Pakistan Cross-Border Strikes

Friday, January 19, 2024

In a surprising turn on January 16, Iran launched missile strikes into Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, claiming it had hit two strongholds of anti-Iran insurgent group Jaish al-Adl (Army of Justice). Iran announced the attack in Pakistan concurrent to its strikes in Iraq and Syria. Less than two days later, Pakistan hit back with not only missiles but also fighter jets in Iran’s Sistan-Baluchistan province — claiming to target hideouts of anti-Pakistan ethno-nationalist insurgents operating from Iranian soil.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal PolicyViolent Extremism

View All Publications