A group of Iran analysts previewed their latest research findings in a discussion at the U.S. Institute of Peace co-sponsored by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars on June 27, 2012. Drawn from USIP’s Iran Internal Politics Study Group, six scholars looked at the recent dramatic changes in Iran’s political system and offered their take on what these changes mean for the country, its reform movement, and the United States.

Making Sense of Iran’s Complex Political Changes
Photo courtesy NYTimes
A group of Iran analysts previewed their latest research findings in a discussion at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) co-sponsored by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars on June 27, 2012. Drawn from USIP’s Iran Internal Politics Study Group, six scholars looked at the recent dramatic changes in Iran’s political system and offered their take on what these changes mean for the country, its reform movement, and the United States.

“The Iran of today is not the Iran of 10 or 15 years ago,” said USIP’s Daniel Brumberg as he opened the discussion. “There has been centralization, but a bargaining process still remains. The system is moving in different ways at different levels.” 


/files/events/Iran/20120627_Iran-6135-MBrief.jpg
(Pictured above, left to right: Shadi Mokhtari, Mehrangiz Kar, Haleh Esfandiari)

According to Brumberg, the office of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has expanded its powers, and a “new elite” of rural citizens and war veterans has emerged in Iran’s government to challenge the traditional political class. These and other dynamics are shifting Iran’s political and security establishments; making sense of these long-term trends is the goal of the Iran Study Group, said Farideh Farhi. Farhi co-directs the study group with Brumberg. 

Other panelists included Mehrangiz Kar, whose comments focused on the rule of law in Iran; Shadi Mokhtari, who analyzed the discourse and extent of human rights critiques of the government; Kevan Harris, who studied the ways Iran’s welfare policies both empower and control its citizens; and Mehrzad Bourouijerdi, who mapped the extensive connections between Khamenei’s office and the rest of Iran’s government. 

Bernard Hourcade, a visiting public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center, commented on the presentations by the Iran Study Group experts. Hourcade noted the importance of analyzing demographics and geography in addition to assessing Iran’s political dynamics. The director of the Wilson Center’s Middle East Program, Haleh Esfandiari, moderated each of the three panels.

The Iran Study Group’s findings are scheduled to be released in a book in late 2012.

Explore Further


Related Publications

Robin Wright on What to Expect from Iran’s New President

Robin Wright on What to Expect from Iran’s New President

Wednesday, July 10, 2024

The election of reformist candidate Masoud Pezeshkian as Iran’s new president dealt a “stunning blow in many ways to the hardliners,” says USIP’s Robin Wright. However, “the hardliners still have control of the legislature and the judiciary, and they can create havoc for the new president” and his agenda.

Type: Podcast

What You Need to Know About Iran’s Election and New President

What You Need to Know About Iran’s Election and New President

Tuesday, July 9, 2024

In a clear challenge to regime hardliners, Masoud Pezeshkian, a reformist and cardiac surgeon, won Iran’s snap presidential election on July 5. The elections were called after President Ebrahim Raisi died in a helicopter crash on May 19. The runoff had been considered a tight race, but Pezeshkian won decisively with almost three million more votes than Saeed Jalili, a hardliner and former nuclear negotiator. Due to take office in August, Pezeshkian, a former deputy speaker of parliament and health minister, will take power as Iran’s government faces legitimacy challenges amid an economic crisis.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Robin Wright on Raisi’s Death and What It Means for Iran

Robin Wright on Raisi’s Death and What It Means for Iran

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

With the death of President Ebrahim Raisi, the Iranian regime has reached “a critical turning point.” And with just two weeks until the vote to replace him, it’s important to pay attention to “not only who wins the new presidency, but how many Iranians actually participate in the process,” says USIP’s Robin Wright.

Type: Podcast

View All Publications