Hesham Sallam, former USIP staffer and doctoral candidate in government at Georgetown University, discusses the recent political developments in post-Mubarak Egypt.

May 31, 2011

Hesham Sallam, former USIP staffer and doctoral candidate in government at Georgetown University, discusses the recent political developments in post-Mubarak Egypt.

What is the current state of the Egyptian opposition?

The March 19 constitutional referendum and the lead-up to it tempered the strong feeling of unity that Tahrir Square once instilled in the country. The referendum marked the return of adversity and competition to Egypt’s political arena, as political groups were actively supporting (if not campaigning on behalf of) the “approve” and “reject” positions prior to the vote. Supporters of the “approve” position, like the Muslim Brotherhood, argued that passing the amendments would not only place limits on presidential powers and provide for judicial supervision of elections, but would also hasten a return to civilian rule. Opponents who called for a brand new constitution complained that the amendments did not go far enough in limiting presidential powers and gave an unfair edge to preexisting political groups.

What started as a disagreement over the content of the amendments soon turned into a full-fledged political battle with sectarian undertones. The fear-mongering tactics that some religious leaders used in encouraging voters to approve the constitutional amendments helped polarize the Egyptian political community across the Islamist/non-Islamist divide after the unprecedented level of cohesion that the opposition showed immediately after January 25. These divisions continued to loom large after March 19.

Back to Top

How did this return to political adversity manifest itself in Egypt? What have been its immediate consequences?

The widespread narrative that a “no” vote is a vote against Article 2 of the Constitution -- which makes sharia the main source of legislation -- turned Egypt’s first national vote in the post-Mubarak era into a divisive enterprise that reinforced sectarian and ideological cleavages. Following the vote, visible conservative preachers issued statements that portrayed overwhelming support for the constitutional amendments as a victory for Islam. This discourse stirred fears among Egyptians who are committed to an inclusive political system accommodating diverse communities, Muslim and Christian alike. Ironically, the role of sharia in lawmaking was technically not up for a vote during the referendum.

Back to Top

How have Egypt's political actors responded to the referendum?

Beyond the ideological and sectarian divisions, the lead-up to the referendum and the perceived success of the Muslim Brotherhood’s campaign in rallying voters in support of the constitutional amendments highlighted the notable gap between the organizational capabilities of the Brotherhood and those who supported the “no” position. Moreover, the mistrust and suspicion that the constitutional referendum injected into Egyptians politics seemed to have reawakened the competitive instincts of non-Islamist political leaders. With the passage of the constitutional amendments and the success of Islamists in garnering support for the “yes” vote, non-Islamist groups saw that they have no choice but to prepare themselves for an uphill battle in the upcoming legislative election scheduled for this September.

Because the country’s permanent constitution and the rules of political competition will be decided by the parliament that will be elected in a few months, it is not surprising that after the referendum many political actors seem to have focused their efforts on building parties and devising viable electoral strategies that could get them a seat at the table on which the country’s future will be negotiated. This is certainly a positive development insofar that it opens up the political field to stronger and more representative political parties and to actors whose voices were marginalized under Mubarak’s rule. Yet it remains that convening elections as early as September will likely put newly emerging political parties at a disadvantage compared to traditional groups that enjoy a long experience in elections under the previous order.

Back to Top

Explore Further

  • Eye on the Middle East and North Africa - Experts from the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) are closely following developments throughout the Middle East and North Africa. In a series of reports and interviews, they cover a wide range of issues.

Related Publications

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Thursday, June 13, 2024

The Gaza war has strained Egyptian-Israeli relations to an unprecedented level and raised questions about the future of their 1979 peace treaty that has been a cornerstone of Arab-Israeli peace. U.S. officials met recently in Cairo with their Israeli and Egyptian counterparts against a backdrop of mutually diminishing confidence between the two parties, particularly following Israel’s ground offensive in Rafah. This comes on the heels of a shooting incident between Israeli and Egyptian forces that left at least one Egyptian soldier dead, and Egypt joining South Africa’s case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Along with Qatar, Egypt is a key broker in the current Israel-Hamas cease-fire efforts and engages in extensive security cooperation with the U.S. and Israel.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

For over three decades, every Chinese foreign minister’s first overseas trip of the year has been to Africa. This year continued the tradition with China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, visiting Egypt, Tunisia, Togo and Côte d'Ivoire. Notably, every one of these countries is coastal. And yet, at a time of continued speculation over China’s next military installation in Africa, none of these countries has featured prominently as potential locations in previous analyses. We might, therefore, reasonably ask what China’s current considerations are around basing in Africa. Faced with an increasingly multipolar and assertive Africa at a time of domestic economic challenge, however, China’s long-term strategy remains unclear.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Thursday, January 18, 2024

Since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, Egypt has been heavily involved in efforts to end the military confrontations and wars that have periodically broken out in Gaza. However, the scope, scale and stakes of the current war is unlike any prior round of hostilities. In response to the massacre and hostage-taking of mostly Israeli civilians by Hamas and other militant armed groups during their devastating attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel has launched one of the most destructive wars in its history. Indeed, this war will be transformational in numerous ways, with ramifications for several stakeholders beyond the parties themselves.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

Thursday, August 3, 2023

Amid today’s dismal Israeli-Palestinian context, positive developments have been in short supply. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s June announcement of preliminary approval for the development of the Gaza Marine gas fields provided a rare glimpse of a potential win-win opportunity. For the Palestinians, it could provide a much-needed boost to their lagging economy and the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority (PA). On the Israeli side, it allows the Netanyahu government to claim it is assisting in improving living conditions in Gaza and could lead to less U.S. pressure on issues like settlement expansion. In the big picture, this is another example of how energy is increasingly becoming a focus for potential win-win agreements in the East Mediterranean.

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications