USIP’s Moeed Yusuf discusses the recent turmoil between the U.S. and Pakistan.

What do you make of the recent developments, and public exchanges, between Pakistan and the U.S.?

Nothing could have been more unfortunate at a time when the two sides seemed to be converging strategically on the need to work together on Afghanistan. The affair with Raymond Davis – the reported CIA contractor held in Pakistan after a deadly shooting incident in January - has thrown both sides off. The conventional wisdom on this relationship thus far was that while public sentiments on both sides are acutely negative, the Track I engagement, barring momentary tensions, are fruitful and cooperative. But, the blow-up after the Davis affair has broken that myth. It has brought to the fore just how fragile this relationship is all-round. Both sides seem to display a sense of betrayal, one that is going to enhance the mistrust to unprecedented levels.

How would you characterize the state of relations between the two countries?

The Pakistan-U.S. relationship has hit a new low in this decade long partnership - and I include in this all major hiccups including the temporary closure of the NATO supply routes last year. This is the first time both Pakistani civilians and military are expressing resentment and frustration in unison. And as far as I can tell, the frustration is genuine. Meanwhile, in Washington, DC, patience is running out, especially on Capitol Hill, and uncharacteristically so it seems in the Pentagon and Langley.

What is USIP doing to improve the situation?

Given the tenuous and oscillatory nature of the U.S.-Pakistan relationship, USIP’s Pakistan program continues to conduct research and programmatic activities aimed at furthering conflict prevention objectives. Among other activities, the Pakistan program recently examined U.S. options vis-à-vis Pakistan in case a future terrorist attack on U.S. soil is traced back to Pakistan. The program’s outreach strives to enhance mutual understanding between the two sides and to provide U.S. policymakers with fresh analyses on Pakistan.

In addition, the Pakistan program has been working on a joint project with the Jinnah Institute entitled “The End Game in Afghanistan: View from Pakistan.” The project aims to assess the views of relevant Pakistani opinion makers and officials on the evolving situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan’s evolving position and role in the conflict. USIP also continues its outreach activities, hosting five public events featuring top experts within the first quarter of 2011, five public events were hosted featuring top experts. 

 


Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications