New legislation in the Iraqi parliament that would allow girls as young as 9 to marry is drawing stiff opposition from a nationwide coalition of civil society groups.

A woman works in a shop that rents wedding dresses in the Sadr City neighborhood of Baghdad.
A woman working in a wedding dress rental shop in the Sadr City neighborhood of Baghdad in 2010. Photo courtesy of the New York Times/Ayman Oghanna

Although the measure is unlikely to pass--a similar proposal was introduced and rejected in 2014--there is concern that it underscores the rising tide of extremist sentiment in Iraq and threatens the constitutional guarantees for gender equality and other freedoms.

“Such continuous attempts by conservative blocs to install strict legislation may exacerbate community divisions along ethnic, sectarian and political lines,” said Maysoon Al-Damluji, a member of the Iraqi parliament who opposes the legislation. The legislation is backed by Shia blocs in parliament and isn’t linked to support for other kinds of radical interpretations of Islam by the ISIS extremist group.

The United Nations and international human rights groups have documented the practice of child marriage in Iraq. A family might marry off a girl thinking it is legitimate religious practice and in her interest because, for example, they can’t afford to care for all their children. The unofficial, religious ceremonies aren’t documented by normal court registration procedures because the practice is illegal. So not only are the girls extremely young, but they are denied any legal rights because of the absence of records. According to a 2011 UNICEF study, approximately 1 in 4 Iraqi girls are married before the legal age of 18, often driven by poverty and long-standing social traditions.

Rezan Sheikh Dler, a member of the Women and Children Committee at the Iraqi National Council of Representatives, blasted the child marriage legislation in the Iraqi media, calling it “sectarian” and “unconstitutional.” She said the new legislation is the same as the old measure that failed and expects it to meet a similar fate.

The attempt to legalize child marriage comes less than a month after conservative lawmakers introduced a proposal regulating the press, the right to free assembly, and the right to hold public demonstrations. Those freedoms are guaranteed under Article 38 of the Iraqi constitution, and a coalition of Iraqi civil rights activists and NGOs calling themselves “Alliance 38” took to the streets to demonstrate against the attempt to curtail civil liberties.

The activists believe this type of legislation not only violates Iraqis’  basic human rights but will deepen community frustrations with the government, possibly leading to unrest that could be exploited by extremist groups such as ISIS.

Hanaa Edwar, who heads an Iraqi organization that trains women and youth on peacebuilding and conflict resolution skills, described the practice of allowing underage girls to marry as a crime against humanity because of the severe physical and psychological suffering it often entails. Her group, the Al-Amal Association, is among USIP grantees promoting the equal participation of women in Iraq’s political and social spheres and is a member of Alliance 38. A 2015 grant to the Women Empowerment Organization paved the way for the government’s adoption of the U.N. Security Council’s landmark Resolution 1325 on women, peace and security, which calls for the protection of women and girls in conflict zones and for women to be involved in decision making on security issues.

In a statement, Alliance 38 criticized Shia political parties for trying to undo a law that has been in effect since 1959 granting women equal rights with men. They said the proposal to allow the marriage of minors as young as age 9 “classifies Iraqis on a confessional and ethnic basis with no regard to the concepts and principles of citizenship on which the Iraqi modern state was founded nearly 90 years ago.”

Related Publications

10 Years After ISIS’s Genocide, Iraq Is Still Dealing with the Human Legacies

10 Years After ISIS’s Genocide, Iraq Is Still Dealing with the Human Legacies

Monday, July 8, 2024

This year marks the 10-year anniversary of ISIS’ capture of a third of Iraqi and Syrian territory and genocide against the Ezidis (Yazidis) and other communities. Supported by the U.S.-led Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, Iraq declared military victory over the terrorist group in December 2017 and has significantly reduced and controlled the threat ever since. Significant progress has also been made in the recovery and stabilization process, with the successful return to their areas of origin of some five million of the six million Iraqis internally displaced by the conflict and the rebuilding of many of the regions that the conflict devastated.

Type: Analysis

ReconciliationViolent Extremism

Baghdad Is Ready for a New Chapter in U.S.-Iraq Relations

Baghdad Is Ready for a New Chapter in U.S.-Iraq Relations

Thursday, April 25, 2024

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani met last week with U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House as part of a weeklong visit aimed at strengthening bilateral relations. The visit occurred amid several historic anniversaries and dangerous developments in the Middle East. April marks the 21st anniversary of the toppling of Saddam Hussein. Since 2003, the U.S.-Iraq relationship has witnessed many ups and downs. Even as tensions persist, particularly in relation to the U.S. troop presence in the country, al-Sudani’s visit — which featured the largest delegation Iraqis have brought to Washington — demonstrates Iraqi will to start a new chapter in the strategic partnership that goes beyond security.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Policy

USIP Explains: Community Dialogue in Northern Sinjar

USIP Explains: Community Dialogue in Northern Sinjar

Thursday, April 11, 2024

Ten years after ISIS’ genocide against them, the wounds of the Yazidi community in Iraq’s Sinjar district remain fresh as thousands remain displaced and even more await justice for the crimes perpetrated against them. Meanwhile, despite living in peaceful coexistence prior to ISIS’ campaign, the conflict planted seeds of division among Sinjar’s various tribes and communities — resulting in tensions that threatened to tear the district apart even after ISIS’ defeat.

Type: Blog

Mediation, Negotiation & DialoguePeace Processes

View All Publications