The massive truck bomb attacks that killed more than 300 people in Mogadishu last weekend are a tragic reminder of the scale of suffering caused by terrorism in Somalia and across the developing world. Yet the solidarity that emerged in the aftermath—as ordinary Somalis, the fledging central government, and the international community worked together to provide relief—suggests a more hopeful path for Somalia. The international community and Somalia should build on this unity by solidifying financing to establish Somali security forces that will be capable of protecting ordinary citizens.  

The African Union Mission in Somalia's Ugandan Contingent Commander, Brigadier General Kayanja Muhanga, visits the site of a VBIED attack conducted by the militant group al Shabaab in the Somali capital of Mogadishu on October 15, 2017. Photo Courtesy of Flickr/AMISOM Photo/Tobin Jones
The commander of the African Union peacekeeping mission in Somalia visits the site of a truck-bomb attack allegedly conducted by al-Shabab in Mogadishu on Oct. 15, 2017. Photo: Flickr/AMISOM/Tobin Jones

That an attack on this scale was even possible in the streets of Somalia’s busy capital, where the newly elected federal government and the 22,000-strong African Union peacekeeping mission are headquartered, illustrates the challenges confronting the country as it struggles to turn the page after decades of conflict. The government said this was the deadliest single terrorist incident in Somalia’s history.

Details concerning the Oct. 14 attacks are still emerging. Early reports suggest the extremist group al-Shabab perpetrated the attack, although the group hasn’t claimed responsibility. Divisions within the army may have contributed to recent military setbacks against al-Shabab, allowing the group to control more territory and infiltrate the truck bombs into Mogadishu. The group also may have taken advantage of political tensions between the central government and the six federal states comprising Somalia.  
The capacity of the government to manage the response also was limited. Hospitals grappled with a surge of severely wounded patients. The central government, which lost at least one official in the attack and has few experts in improvised explosives, struggled to investigate the attack.

Thousands March Against Al-Shabab 

Yet an unusual degree of solidarity has emerged in the aftermath. Authorities set up a task force and emergency response center to coordinate disaster management, while Somalia’s international partners rushed in medical assistance. Ordinary Somalis used internet technology to organize search-and-rescue efforts, relief distributions, blood donations, the identification of missing persons, and fundraising campaigns. On Oct. 18, thousands of Somalis demonstrated in the capital, united against al-Shabab. The tense relationship between the central government and Somaliland also seemed to ease at least temporarily as the latter publicly condemned the attacks.

Such momentum is exactly what is needed to re-energize peacebuilding and defeat al-Shabab, which is more isolated as result of backlash to its vicious attacks. Somalia and its international partners have agreed on ambitious plans for a new national army and federal and state police that ultimately will step in to provide security instead of the decade-old African Union mission. The challenge now is to secure the funding.

Public Financing for Security

National leaders also should leverage the new solidarity to increase public revenues, including by agreeing to divvy up tax collection and spending authority. In parallel, the government could work with the private sector, particularly the successful telecommunications industry, to devise a formal tax scheme and regulation. The business community is understandably reluctant until it sees evidence that taxes will be put to good use, particularly in maintaining basic security. One option would be to peg the private sector’s commitment to tax reform to preliminary benchmarks for establishing legitimate security forces.  

Somalia’s ability to provide security and other basic services also is hamstrung by the country’s debt, which accumulated long before the devastating war began over two decades ago, but still restricts borrowing even at this critical stage. The United States and other donors should either significantly expedite the write-down of Somalia’s debt, or make an exception to allow new grants starting this calendar year. 

Now is the time to act, while Somali citizens’ trust in their new government is on the rise.

Related Publications

The Red Sea Crisis Goes Beyond the Houthis

The Red Sea Crisis Goes Beyond the Houthis

Friday, July 19, 2024

The Red Sea is in crisis. At the center of the storm are Yemen’s Houthi rebels, who have unleashed a wave of attacks on ships traversing one of the world’s most pivotal maritime straits, putatively in support of Hamas’s war against Israel. The Houthi gambit in the Red Sea is imposing serious costs on global trade, as did the problem of Somali piracy, which reached its peak in 2010. The United States and some of its allies have stepped in to militarily suppress the threat, bombing Houthi positions inside Yemen. But although this episode is illustrative of the difficulties of Red Sea security, the crisis extends far beyond the trouble emanating from Yemen.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Somalia’s Critical Transition Comes amid al-Shabab and Hunger Challenges

Somalia’s Critical Transition Comes amid al-Shabab and Hunger Challenges

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

On May 15, Somali legislators selected former president Hassan Sheikh Mohamud to reprise the chief executive role he played from 2012-2017. The vote marks a critical transition for Somalia and in the Horn of Africa, particularly after the election was delayed by two years and marred by corruption and violence. President Hassan Sheikh will return to power in a country seemingly splitting at the seams, amid a devastating drought, a metastasizing terrorist threat and a fractious political scene. Meanwhile, President Biden has decided to redeploy U.S. troops to fight the terrorist group al-Shabab, reversing a move made by President Trump at the end of his term.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceViolent Extremism

Why the U.S. Needs a Special Envoy for the Red Sea

Why the U.S. Needs a Special Envoy for the Red Sea

Tuesday, October 23, 2018

The Trump administration has appointed four special envoys to coordinate U.S. policy toward key hot spots: Iran, North Korea, Syria, and Afghanistan. Yet in the Red Sea—one of the most volatile and lethal regions of the world afflicted by several interconnected conflicts and rivalries that pose significant challenges to American interests—U.S. policy has been rudderless in large part due to the absence of a similar post.

Type: Analysis

Global PolicyConflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications