In the two years since the Taliban takeover, the Afghan economy has crumbled, the financial system has largely collapsed, and the international community has opted for unified nonrecognition of the Taliban. Donors and NGOs now face the immense challenge of meeting the needs of the Afghan people under these dire conditions. With an overwhelming majority of Afghans living in severe poverty, and with limited international support, these organizations have had to navigate delicate engagement with an unrecognized government while continuing to provide vital assistance and services.

Recently, the humanitarian situation has only grown more urgent, compounded by the Taliban’s increased restrictions against Afghan female staffers at NGOs. Donors’ priorities are also changing, leading to concerns about a steep drop in funding for humanitarian activities in the country. While nonrecognition serves a purpose, it does not eliminate the enormous humanitarian and economic crisis in the country. In order to effectively respond to the humanitarian crisis, the international community must develop a clear and effective response.

On July 12, USIP, the International Rescue Committee, CARE, and the Norwegian Refugee Council hosted a discussion with distinguished experts and activists to assess the current economic and humanitarian situation in Afghanistan and its impact on the Afghan people. The conversation also explored how the situation could evolve as the Taliban continue to hold power — and what the international community can do to support the Afghan people in light of changing priorities and funding.

Continue the conversation on Twitter using the hashtag #AfghanistanUSIP.

Panelists 

William Byrd, moderator
Senior Expert, Afghanistan, U.S. Institute of Peace

Melissa Cornet
Humanitarian Advocacy Advisor, CARE

Khalid Payenda
Director and co-founder, Institute for Development and Economic Studies (IDEA)

Samira Sayed-Rahman
Director of Policy, Advocacy and Communications, International Rescue Committee

Related Publications

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

At the end of June, envoys and representatives from more than 25 countries and international organizations gathered in Doha, Qatar, along with representatives from the Taliban under an U.N.-facilitated framework. This meeting was the third of its kind, widely referred to as “Doha 3,” and part of a process to establish a more coordinated and coherent global approach to Afghanistan’s challenges and the Taliban’s rule.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications