Peacebuilding work matters, but we still struggle to show evidence of where interventions have led to positive outcomes, such as a clear reduction in violence or increased cooperation. The Peacebuilding M&E Solutions Forum is an opportunity for practitioners to come together, network and connect with people working in this space, and share best practices, lessons learned, results, and evidence from across the broad spectrum of M&E activities on peacebuilding programming. This event was co-hosted by the U.S. Institute of Peace and the Alliance for Peacebuilding.

In order to lay the foundation for showing greater evidence, we must overcome the challenge of weak M&E practices in rapidly shifting and complex environments. If we believe that what we do is important and that our work is effective, then we need to prove it to our beneficiaries, donors, and ourselves. The Peacebuilding M&E Solutions Forum sought to begin addressing this need and explore new ways to demonstrate the impact of peacebuilding programming.

Agenda

9:00am: Greetings & Welcome to Event (AfP, USIP, & OEF) 

9:10am: Morning Panel

  • Improving Research Design (Methodological approaches for evaluations before, during, and after a program is implemented)
  • Improving Data Analysis (Data-based Decision Making for Building and Sustaining Peace)
  • Improving Data Use (Making Research Useful and Used: Lessons from a Mixed-Method Evaluation in Somalia
  • Moderated Q&A

11:15am: Breakout Sessions

  • Impact Evaluations & RCTs
    • Randomized Control Trial Evaluation of Religious Peacebuilding
    • Seriously? RCTs Role in Peacebuilding
    • Evaluating the impact mass and social media programming to alter public perceptions
  • Qualitative Research
    • Measuring the Hard to Measure: Qualitative Rigor
    • Capturing Conversations: Guided Dialogue Observation
    • Sensemaking in Peacebuilding Evaluation
  • Joint Action & Collective Impact
    • Designing Collective Impact for Peacebuilding
    • Collective Monitoring: Lessons from Central African Republic
    • Joint Community Action Plans for Peace-Building in Nigeria

1:30pm: Breakout Sessions

  • Adaptive Management & Evaluation
    • Adaptive Learning: Outcome Harvesting an alternative to results-based programming?
    • Lessons from Experience: Outcome Mapping in Conflict-Affected Contexts
    • Developmental Evaluation: Youth and Community Resilience against VE
  • Participatory M&E
    • Feedback Loops in Inclusive and Participatory M&E
    • Everyday Peace Indicators
    • PhotoVoice : Amplifying Youth Voices
  • M&E Purpose & Quality Assurance
    • The Evolution of the Role of M&E in Peacebuilding Programming
    • Searching for Balance: From Agency Measurement to Program Specifics
    • Data quality assurance: Audio check in complex environments

3:15pm: Breakout Sessions

  • Evaluation & Data Use
    • Evaluation of Early Childhood development program in Rwanda: Research with Children under age 6
    • Promoting and Evaluating Joint Action for Reconciliation Between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Peoples in Saskatchewan, Canada
    • Monitoring for Adaptive Programming: Data to Inform
  • Conflict Monitoring & Early Warning Systems
    • Conflict scan as a quick actionable tool for monitoring conflict
    • The SCORE Methodology Measuring the intangible and predicting peace
    • Community-driven approach to monitoring conflict and Peace projects: A review of BEWERS Monitoring Strategy
  • Theory & Institutional Learning
    • From M&E to Institutional Learning: Progress through University Partnerships (Case study in Kurdistan, Iraq)
    • Theory-based approaches for evaluative program monitoring
    •  Evaluating Across Contexts: Lessons from a Meta-Review Process

Morning Panel

Keith B. Ives
CEO, Causal Design

Jon Kurtz
Director of Research and Learning, Mercy Corps

David Hammond
Director of Research, Institute for Economics and Peace

Andrew Blum
Executive Director, Kroc Institute for Peace and Justice

Beza Tesfaye
Senior Researcher, Mercy Corps

Related Publications

Explainer: What Caused the Recent Unrest in New Caledonia?

Explainer: What Caused the Recent Unrest in New Caledonia?

Thursday, May 23, 2024

Violence engulfed New Caledonia last week as the French National Assembly passed a constitutional amendment that will undermine the political representation of the Pacific territory’s Indigenous Kanak people. During days of unrest unprecedented since the 1980s, security forces and protesters clashed across the archipelago, leaving six dead and hundreds injured. Buildings and vehicles were set on fire in the capital, Nouméa, while streets were barricaded throughout the territory, flights were grounded and New Caledonia was placed under a state of emergency.

Type: Question and Answer

Democracy & GovernanceFragility & Resilience

Traumatic Decarbonization in Fragile States

Traumatic Decarbonization in Fragile States

Wednesday, May 15, 2024

The process of decarbonization—that is, the replacement of fossil fuels with non-hydrocarbon-based forms of energy—is essential for meeting the climate goals articulated by international agreements. But in fragile, oil-dependent nations, where hydrocarbon revenues are often a key means of political control, decarbonization can spell the difference between peace and conflict. This report examines the consequences of the sudden loss of oil revenues for fragile, conflict-affected states and provides recommendations for policymakers on how to manage future decarbonization peacefully.

Type: Peaceworks

Conflict Analysis & PreventionEconomicsEnvironmentFragility & Resilience

How ‘Traumatic Decarbonization’ Can Impact Political Stability and Peace

How ‘Traumatic Decarbonization’ Can Impact Political Stability and Peace

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

The process of decarbonization — that is, the replacement of fossil fuels with non-hydrocarbon-based forms of energy — is essential for the world to meet its climate goals. But in many fragile oil-producing states, hydrocarbon revenues are not just central to national economies. They also bind together the political system through elite revenue-sharing pacts. The rapid, unplanned decarbonization of these countries would spark political crisis, a process known as “traumatic decarbonization.”

Type: Question and Answer

EnvironmentFragility & Resilience

For Peace in Sahel, African and U.S. Experts Urge Focused Partnership

For Peace in Sahel, African and U.S. Experts Urge Focused Partnership

Thursday, February 22, 2024

The past month has sharpened a decade-old question for U.S. and international policymakers: How best, in 2024, to help stabilize what is now the world’s largest single zone of military rule and violent conflicts — Africa’s Sahel region? After three military-ruled Sahel states withdrew from the West African regional community in January, those juntas last week proclaimed an alliance aimed at resisting international pressures, including those for their return to elected civilian rule. Former U.S. and African officials yesterday urged what they called vital changes in U.S. and allied policies to prevent a dangerous spread of the Sahel’s crises.

Type: Analysis

Fragility & Resilience

View All Publications