The second annual meeting of the International Network to Promote the Rule of Law (INPROL) took place on Friday, July 17 at the United States Institute of Peace. The focus this year was on a discussion of preliminary lessons learned from the experience of the UN Mission in Kosovo in establishing the justice and corrections systems in Kosovo.

On July 16 the International Network to Promote the Rule of Law (INPROL) hosted an all-day "lessons learned" workshop at the US Institute of Peace (USIP) with the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO). The workshop examined the 10-year experience of the UN Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) with establishing the criminal justice system. Participants included former senior UNMIK officials from the judiciary, police, and penal management. INPROL and DPKO are collaborating to produce a draft UNMIK "lessons learned" report in the fall.

INPROL conducted its second annual meeting the following day. USIP Executive Vice President Tara Sonenshine delivered the opening remarks, and UN Assistant Secretary-General Dmitry Titov spoke to INPROL members gathered at USIP and via webcast to members across the globe. He encouraged use of INPROL to gather essential documents containing guidelines and lessons learned for all disciplines relating to rule of law and to assist with specialized distance learning courses.

Following Mr. Titov's remarks, INPROL Co-Director Michael Dziedzic delivered a briefing on INPROL's accomplishments during the past year and discussed upcoming opportunities, including the prospect of establishing new forums on corrections and gender issues. The following are key statistics on activities of the past year:

 

  • 50% increase in membership (from 800 to nearly 1,200)
  • 40 queries submitted
  • 155 responses provided by INPROL members on the forums
  • 7 Consolidated Responses developed
  • 13,755 visitors; 21,441 visits

The bulk of the annual meeting featured panels by several workshop participants who presented preliminary "lessons learned" for international judges and prosecutors (Milbert Chin, Agnieszka Klonowiecka-Milart, Clive Baldwin, Stefan Feller and Scott Carlson), corrections officials (Mary Okumu and Stephen Johnston), and for building local capacity (George Huber, Michael Hartmann and David Marshall).

 

Some of the key lessons discussed:

    • There is a need for a standardized selection process for international judges and prosecutors to prevent personality driven hiring
    • Induction training for international judges and prosecutors should be required.
    • Strategic plans should be living documents based on, and revised in, regular consultations with local actors and key stakeholders.
    • Strategic plans should be multi-track so that there is no single end date applicable to all various initiatives within the justice sector.
    • Corrections officials should have a prominent place in planning (assessment teams, formulation of mandate) and management (senior management teams) of missions to help raise awareness and funding for corrections issues.
    • Legislative reform should focus on modest, but high-impact reforms.
    • Witness protection should be tailored to fit the specifics of the environment.
    • Information-gathering operations should be incorporated into missions in a systematic fashion.

INPROL and DPKO are developing a literature review-based Consolidated Response that will also include several other lessons discussed at the workshop and meeting.

This year's annual meeting was also webcast live to our members around the world who were unable to attend in person. We were very pleased to have dozens viewers, including several who submitted questions and received responses from panelists. We are excited about this new capability and look forward to incorporating it into many future activities.

A video archive of the annual meeting webcast and associated materials may be accessed at http://inprol.org/webcast.

Related Publications

As ISIS Fighters Return Home, Mobilizing Communities

As ISIS Fighters Return Home, Mobilizing Communities

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

The dozen senior officials seated around the room were veterans of high-level strategy and planning. They work in ministries. They serve as analysts and advisors on security, counterterrorism, human rights. They had helped craft their national policy to prevent violent extremism. Now they were embarking on a specific plan for handling the next stage of the problem.

Type: In the Field

Violent Extremism

Violent Extremists Find Traction Among Kosovo’s Youth

Violent Extremists Find Traction Among Kosovo’s Youth

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Last month, police arrested 25 people for allegedly planning synchronized terrorist attacks in Kosovo and Albania, including against the Israeli national soccer team and its fans during a match. Authorities said the foiled attacks had been ordered and coordinated by ISIS commanders from Kosovo fighting in Syria and Iraq. The case underscores the accelerating risk for terror attacks outside Iraq and Syria, as ISIS loses ground, its foreign fighters return home or fresh recruits get stuck in th...

Type: Blog

Violent ExtremismYouthConflict Analysis & Prevention

Dynamics of Radicalization and Violent Extremism in Kosovo

Dynamics of Radicalization and Violent Extremism in Kosovo

Monday, December 19, 2016

Relying in large part on primary empirical evidence, this report explores the dynamics of violent extremism in Kosovo and the disproportionately high number of radicalized fighters from the region in Syria and Iraq. Examining the historic, cultural, geopolitical, and socioeconomic factors behind the phenomenon, it focuses on the flow as a symptom of a larger religious militancy problem within the country and offers recommendations on countering that challenge.  

Type: Special Report

Violent ExtremismFragility & ResilienceReligion

A Post-War Transition That Works: A Lesson for Afghanistan... from Kosovo

A Post-War Transition That Works: A Lesson for Afghanistan... from Kosovo

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

A case study hashed out at West Point recently focused on a conflict 15 years past to demonstrate that a post-war transition has a better chance of success with three key elements. The formula could reframe the nation’s recurring debate over “nation-building” and point the way to approaches that might help the U.S. and its allies during the next phase of Afghanistan’s transition.

Type: Blog

View All Publications