The expansion of freedom of expression and the emergence of a vibrant free press were among the biggest achievements of the 2001-2021 period and made Afghanistan a standout in the region for independent media. But since taking power in August 2021, the de facto Taliban government has eroded these gains, leaving the future of free media in Afghanistan unclear. Over the past year, the Taliban have shut down and restricted media organizations, detained journalists and imposed harsher restrictions on female reporters. However, media organizations are fighting back, finding innovative ways to get accurate, timely information to the Afghan public.

Kate Bateman, USIP; Ayesha Tanzeem, Voice of America; Barry Salaam, USIP; Rahim Gulf Sarwan, Voice of America -- Afghanistan; Gypsy Guillén Kaiser, Committee to Protect Journalists
Kate Bateman, USIP; Ayesha Tanzeem, Voice of America; Barry Salaam, USIP; Rahim Gulf Sarwan, Voice of America -- Afghanistan; Gypsy Guillén Kaiser, Committee to Protect Journalists

According to Reporters Without Borders, in the year since the Taliban takeover, Afghanistan has lost 40 percent of its media outlets and 60 percent of its journalists, including a steeper decline in women journalists. A free press in Afghanistan is essential for Afghans to hold their government accountable and for human rights monitoring. Amid the economic and humanitarian crises facing the country, Afghans also rely on the media for life-saving information about humanitarian aid and international assistance. 

On January 19, USIP and Voice of America hosted a discussion with journalists and media experts about the challenges facing media in Afghanistan today and what those both inside and outside the country are doing — and can do — to protect media freedom and continue their work safely. The conversation also looked at lessons from other authoritarian contexts to discuss what has worked to preserve media freedom in hostile environments.

Continue the conversation on Twitter using #AfghanistanUSIP.

Hear a one-on-one interview with Ayesha Tanzeem, director of Voice of America's South and Central Asia Division, in our Event Extra podcast.

Speakers

Ayesha Tanzeem
Director of the South and Central Asia Division and Former Bureau Chief for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Voice of America

Rahim Gul Sarwan
Senior Correspondent, Voice of America – Afghanistan 

Barry Salaam
Senior Program Officer, Afghanistan, U.S. Institute of Peace

Gypsy Guillén Kaiser
Advocacy and Communications Director, Committee to Protect Journalists 

Kate Bateman, moderator 
Senior Expert, Afghanistan, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications