The pros and cons of large corporations operating in fragile environments have been widely debated; particularly with respect to extractive industries. On the one hand, their investments and engagements could improve economic prospects and potentially promote peace. On the other hand, they contribute to exacerbate tensions inadvertently or deliberately by adopting policies and practices that are not conflict-sensitive. In some cases they contravene international law.

UK-based International Alert and Norwegian NGO the Fafo Institute teamed up to launch the "Red Flags" initiative to highlight the responsibilities of companies operating in fragile zones. According to John Ruggie, UN Special Representative for Business and Human Rights, Red Flags is "an indispensable tool alerting companies to risks that may contribute to serious human rights abuses . . . . enabling them to change their plans before harm occurs."

Salil Tripathi, Senior Policy Advisor at International Alert, will discuss the relevance and applicability of this initiative. Raymond Gilpin of USIP will discuss potential benefits of large corporations in conflict-affected regions; the "green flags." He will also examine the relevance of corporate social responsibility in this context.


Speakers

  • Salil Tripathi
    International Alert
  • Raymond Gilpin
    Associate Vice President, Sustainable Economies, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Abiodun Williams, Moderator
    Vice President, Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention, U.S. Institute of Peace

 

Related Publications

What Is Africa's Lobito Corridor?

What Is Africa's Lobito Corridor?

Tuesday, June 18, 2024

The Lobito Corridor is a railway project stretching from the Angolan port of Lobito on Africa’s Atlantic coast to the city of Kolwezi in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which contains one of the largest mining deposits in the world. Anthony Carroll, a member of USIP's senior study group on critical minerals in Africa, discusses how this multi-country project can help speed access to critical minerals for U.S. and European markets, bolster African economic development and reduce reliance on China for critical mineral supply lines.

Type: Blog

EconomicsEnvironment

Traumatic Decarbonization in Fragile States

Traumatic Decarbonization in Fragile States

Wednesday, May 15, 2024

The process of decarbonization—that is, the replacement of fossil fuels with non-hydrocarbon-based forms of energy—is essential for meeting the climate goals articulated by international agreements. But in fragile, oil-dependent nations, where hydrocarbon revenues are often a key means of political control, decarbonization can spell the difference between peace and conflict. This report examines the consequences of the sudden loss of oil revenues for fragile, conflict-affected states and provides recommendations for policymakers on how to manage future decarbonization peacefully.

Type: Peaceworks

Conflict Analysis & PreventionEconomicsEnvironmentFragility & Resilience

A Livable Climate Needs Help From Youth; the U.S. Can Foster It

A Livable Climate Needs Help From Youth; the U.S. Can Foster It

Thursday, May 9, 2024

Humanity is at a tipping point. New data confirms 2023 as Earth’s hottest-ever recorded year. Increasing temperatures, rising seas and extreme weather are heightening tension over resources, damaging people’s health and livelihoods, and displacing millions. Young people have one of the largest stakes in climate decisions made today, for they face the lasting environmental consequences of climate change — and the consequent threats to peace and security. Yet youth remain mostly excluded from decision-making on climate. U.S. leadership, via three steps in particular, can bolster genuine youth leadership on climate that prioritizes the welfare of future generations.

Type: Analysis

EnvironmentYouth

International action on climate change is failing. How can it be strengthened?

International action on climate change is failing. How can it be strengthened?

Thursday, May 9, 2024

After a record-breaking 2023, consolidated climate change science clearly shows that the earth’s temperature over the last 12 months was more than to 1.6oC above the pre-industrial average. This makes the most ambitious temperature goal of the Paris Agreement — holding the increase in global temperature below 2°C above pre-industrial levels — no longer scientifically feasible. Most estimates suggest that the increase will be 2.9oC or more by 2100. Meanwhile, international action under the Paris Agreement is faltering. “We are on a highway to climate hell with our foot still on the accelerator,” U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said two years ago.

Type: Analysis

Environment

View All Publications