Mediation has always been critical for peace. But despite becoming increasingly professionalized, utilized and resourced in recent years, mediation processes have too often found themselves outmatched by the disruptive local, national and geopolitical forces of the current moment. And with violent conflict surging worldwide, failed or neglected political processes have given way to the Taliban’s Takeover in Afghanistan and some of the world’s most notable conflicts in the Middle East, Sudan, and Ukraine. Meditation’s value as a peacebuilding tool is facing severe pressure — but the moment is ripe for reflection. 

The 30th issue of Conciliation Resources’ Accord publication series, “Still Time to Talk: Adaptation and Innovation in Peace Mediation,” brings together practitioners, policymakers, analysts and activists from around the world to explore innovative ways to strengthen mediation processes going forward. The publication also examines how mediators can navigate a range of global stresses, from geopolitical polarization to the climate crisis to deep technological change. 

On October 31, USIP and Conciliation Resources hosted a discussion of “Still Time to Talk: Adaptation and Innovation in Peace Mediation.” The conversation drew from the publication’s recommendations to identify contemporary priorities for mediators, conflict parties and unarmed participants in peace processes — including when it comes to addressing and using new digital technologies.

Speakers

Sasha Pippenger, moderator 
Acting Director, Peace Processes, U.S. Institute of Peace

Teresa Whitfield 
Former Director, Policy and Mediation Division, U.N. Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs; Editor, “Still Time to Talk: Adaptation and Innovation in Peace Mediation”

Sean Kane 
Contributing Author, “Still Time to Talk: Adaptation and Innovation in Peace Mediation”

Meredith Preston McGhie 
Secretary General, Global Centre for Pluralism

Yun Sun 
Senior Fellow, Stimson Center

Alexander Ramsbotham 
Director of Research and Innovation, Conciliation Resources

Tyler J. Thompson
Senior Advisor, Negotiations Support Unit, U.S. State Department, Bureau of Conflict & Stabilization Operations

Related Publications

Where Does the Bougainville Peace Agreement Stand?

Where Does the Bougainville Peace Agreement Stand?

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

Under the Bougainville Peace Agreement, 97.7 percent of Bougainvillians voted for independence from Papua New Guinea in a 2019 nonbinding referendum. But despite this near-unanimous result, the agreement itself was unclear on how the process should proceed — leaving the governments of Bougainville and Papua New Guinea to develop a political settlement on their own. Kevin Pullen, a doctoral candidate at the Australian National University, explores where the negotiations stand today, why it’s important to prepare Bougainville to manage its own affairs regardless of what shape the political settlement may take, and the situation’s impact on U.S. Indo-Pacific policy.

Type: Blog

Peace Processes

Ukraine’s Plea: Security Pledges Are the Path to Lasting Peace

Ukraine’s Plea: Security Pledges Are the Path to Lasting Peace

Thursday, October 24, 2024

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy outlined to the Ukrainian parliament last week, for the first time in a public address, his victory plan to end the war. The plan, a roadmap on how to bring to the conflict to a close, contains five sections and three classified annexes that cover everything from meeting military requirements today to rebuilding the Ukrainian economy at the conclusion of the war. Zelenskyy has attempted to gather resources for the war and rally allies around a common goal. He spent the past two weeks on the road, briefing senior U.S. leaders, including both presidential candidates, Europeans and NATO’s secretary-general on what he sees as vital to ending Russia’s war on his country in an enduring way: NATO membership.

Type: Analysis

Global PolicyPeace Processes

Beyond the Dayton Accords: Resolving Bosnia-Herzegovina’s Frozen Conflict

Beyond the Dayton Accords: Resolving Bosnia-Herzegovina’s Frozen Conflict

Wednesday, October 23, 2024

Looking out from the town hall in downtown Sarajevo, you’d be hard pressed to find evidence of the nearly four-year-long siege that devastated the city during the Bosnian War. The surrounding area is clean and filled with new and repaired buildings — even the town hall itself is a restoration of the pre-war library that once occupied the space. 

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernancePeace ProcessesReligion

More States Are Vying to Mediate Conflict — What Does it Mean for Global Peace?

More States Are Vying to Mediate Conflict — What Does it Mean for Global Peace?

Monday, October 7, 2024

Unsurprisingly, the conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan dominated discussions among world leaders at the recent U.N. General Assembly. So did calls to reform and strengthen the international system, reflecting shifting global power dynamics. Diplomatic meetings in New York also revealed how these increasingly complex conflicts and shifting power dynamics are coming together in an emerging trend: a more diverse set of countries striving to mediate conflicts. At the beginning of the week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to discuss avenues to peace, building on Modi’s recent trips to Kyiv and Moscow. At the end of the week, Chinese and Brazilian officials co-hosted an event to garner international support for their peace plan for Ukraine, which Kyiv opposes.

Type: Analysis

Global PolicyMediation, Negotiation & DialoguePeace Processes

View All Publications