Seventeen years ago today, we experienced the gravest attack on our nation since World War II. Everything we thought we knew about protecting the safety of American citizens and security of our shores changed overnight. Americans came face-to-face with an unfamiliar enemy: violent extremists.

Fighters, who joined a militia to help liberate the city of Mosul from the Islamic State, wait at their base near the Mosul Dam near Karaj, Iraq, Oct. 18, 2016. (Bryan Denton/The New York Times)
Fighters, who joined a militia to help liberate the city of Mosul from the Islamic State, wait at their base near the Mosul Dam near Karaj, Iraq, Oct. 18, 2016. (Bryan Denton/The New York Times)

In the aftermath of the tragedy, the families of the victims, Congress and the administration rallied together to protect our country and defeat those who sought to harm us. As a part of this effort, we were tasked with convening a commission to understand the causes of the attacks on 9/11 and develop a strategy for preventing another attack on America.

The resulting 9/11 Commission Report, released 14 years ago, recommended three core goals for U.S. policy: attack terrorists and their organizations; protect against and prepare for attacks; and prevent the continued growth of Islamist terrorism.

Since 9/11, Extremism has Grown in Fragile States

In the intervening years, we have been successful in protecting our homeland. But we have not been able to prevent the continued growth of extremism abroad. In fact, terrorist attacks have increased, and violent extremist groups have spread in fragile states across the Middle East, North Africa, Horn of Africa, and the Sahel. These groups have gained footholds in 19 countries of these regions and used these footholds to expand their influence.

America now faces a new challenge. That is why Congress charged the U.S. Institute of Peace with convening the bipartisan Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States to study the challenge and propose a comprehensive plan to prevent the underlying causes of extremism in fragile states.

As chairs of the 9/11 Commission, we willingly agreed to lead the Task Force, seeing it as the necessary continuation of our previous work. Today we release the Task Force's first report, aptly titled "Beyond the Homeland: Protecting America from Extremism in Fragile States."

A New Strategy to Address Extremism Where it Starts

The report warns that we urgently need a new approach to address the root causes of violent extremism and previews a comprehensive preventive strategy that focuses on strengthening resilience against extremism in fragile states.

Like the 9/11 Commission, the Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States began by seeking to better understand the extremist threat of today. The report finds: "We confront a different strategic environment than on 9/11. The Middle East, the Horn of Africa, and the Sahel have become increasingly fragile. Extremists' strategies have evolved, and their focus is now on establishing a new political order. Meanwhile, America's rivals have seized on this disorder to grow their power and influence, preying on the weakness of state fragility."

Al-Qaida and the Islamic State have exploited weak governance in fragile states to seize territory, impose their intolerant, totalitarian rule, and try to show they can govern better than existing states. Since 2006, 30 countries in the Middle East, the Horn of Africa and the Sahel have become more fragile, providing ample opportunity for extremism to expand their influence. Extremism has fueled instability that spills across borders, weakens U.S. allies, triggers further crises, such as the unprecedented wave of refugees.

Early next year, we will release a follow-up report that will detail a recommended action plan to strengthen national security by reducing the conditions that fuel extremism in fragile states. This plan will pursue four broad goals in fragile states of the Middle East, Horn of Africa, and the Sahel:

  • Alleviating real and perceived injustice
  • Fostering political inclusion
  • Curbing the appeal of extremist ideology
  • Containing the spread of extremist groups

When we released the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004, we had widespread support for a new approach to combatting terrorism. We need such support now. It is tempting to think that because there have been no large-scale attacks on our shores in the last 17 years, the extremist threat has subsided. But it has not. And it will not as long as we allow extremism to grow. We need a new strategy for curbing the spread of extremism to protect our security at home and our interests abroad.

Read the full report (PDF)

Related Publications

Sahel Coup Regime’s Split from ECOWAS Risks Instability in Coastal West Africa

Sahel Coup Regime’s Split from ECOWAS Risks Instability in Coastal West Africa

Thursday, October 24, 2024

As policymakers monitor the spread of terrorist violence and warfare from the Sahel region, one broad threat to international and U.S. interests is West Africa’s 3.4 million people uprooted by the Sahel’s chaos. So far, over 110,000 have fled to four West African coastal states, a migration that signals new dangers to the region’s democracies, and to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the multinational body that for decades has been central to promoting region-wide stability.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceFragility & Resilience

Quatre moyens par lesquels les États-Unis peuvent aider à faire progresser Haïti

Quatre moyens par lesquels les États-Unis peuvent aider à faire progresser Haïti

Thursday, September 5, 2024

Depuis que Haïti a conclu un accord politique début avril pour avancer vers une « transition ordonnée », de nombreux progrès ont été réalisés. Médié par la Communauté des Caraïbes (CARICOM), cet accord fixe à février 2026 l’échéance pour la mise en place d’un gouvernement et d’un parlement élus. Bien que politiquement et administrativement fragile, une structure de gouvernance transitoire est en place, dirigée par un Conseil présidentiel de transition (CPT) et le Premier ministre Garry Conille. Une mission multinationale de soutien à la sécurité (MSS), dirigée par le Kenya, est désormais active dans le pays et travaille à stabiliser la situation sécuritaire.

Type: Analysis

Fragility & Resilience

Four Ways the U.S. Can Help Advance Haiti’s Progress

Four Ways the U.S. Can Help Advance Haiti’s Progress

Thursday, September 5, 2024

Since Haiti reached a political agreement in early April to push ahead with an “orderly transition," much progress has been made. Mediated by the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), that deal has a February 2026 timetable for an elected government and parliament. Although politically and administratively wobbly, a transitional governance structure is in place, led by a Transition Presidential Council (TPC) and Prime Minister Garry Conille. A Kenyan-led Multinational Security Support mission (MSS) is now active in the country and working to stabilize the security situation. Working with Haiti’s political and civil society leadership, the country’s diaspora and key international actors, the U.S. can help build on these milestones and pave a sustainable path out of Haiti’s long-running crises.

Type: Analysis

Fragility & Resilience

Explainer: What Caused the Recent Unrest in New Caledonia?

Explainer: What Caused the Recent Unrest in New Caledonia?

Thursday, May 23, 2024

Violence engulfed New Caledonia last week as the French National Assembly passed a constitutional amendment that will undermine the political representation of the Pacific territory’s Indigenous Kanak people. During days of unrest unprecedented since the 1980s, security forces and protesters clashed across the archipelago, leaving six dead and hundreds injured. Buildings and vehicles were set on fire in the capital, Nouméa, while streets were barricaded throughout the territory, flights were grounded and New Caledonia was placed under a state of emergency.

Type: Question and Answer

Democracy & GovernanceFragility & Resilience

View All Publications