At the urging of Congress, the United States Institute of Peace, together with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Center for the Study of the Presidency (CSP), and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University, conducted and independent assessment of the current and prospective situation on the ground in Iraq, its impact on the surrounding region, and consequences for U.S. interests. 

Iraq study group co-chair James Baker discusses the new  initiative as fellow co-chair Lee Hamilton (far right) and  others look on.
Iraq study group co-chair James Baker discusses the new initiative as fellow co-chair Lee Hamilton (far right) and others look on.

The bipartisan Iraq Study Group was led by co-chairs James A. Baker, III, former secretary of state and honorary chairman of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University, and Lee H. Hamilton, former congressman and director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

The Iraq Study Group made a forward-looking, independent assessment of the current and prospective situation on the ground in Iraq and how it affects the surrounding region as well as U.S. interests.

The study group examined four broad topics:

  • the strategic environment in and around Iraq;
  • the security of Iraq and key challenges to enhancing security within the country;
  • political developments within Iraq following the elections and formation of the new government;
  • and the economy and reconstruction.

The final report was released to Congress, the White House, and the public on December 6, 2006.

Why did Congress select USIP to facilitate the Iraq Study Group?

  • In 2005, also at the request of Congress, the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) successfully coordinated a similar bipartisan effort to evaluate our nation’s role and relationship with the United Nations. The Task Force on the United Nations' resulting report led to calls for immediate action and attention for reforming the United Nations.
  • The United States Institute of Peace was created by Congress with the signing of the 1984 United States Institute of Peace Act. By law, USIP is governed by a bipartisan Board of Directors and is tasked with preventing, managing, and resolving international conflict and promoting stability in post-conflict areas. USIP also "thinks, acts, teaches, and trains" providing a unique combination of nonpartisan research, innovative program development, and hands-on peacebuilding support.
  • With over seventy foreign policy specialists whose expertise bring decades of government, military, university, NGO, and other valuable experience to the international arena, USIP analysts are uniquely poised to advise, assist, and convene efforts such as the Iraq Study Group.
  • USIP has been operating on the ground in Iraq since 2004, working with Iraqis to reduce interethnic and interreligious violence, speed up stabilization and democratization, and reduce the need for a U.S. presence in Iraq.

*Note: USIP coordinated the process and provided analysis for the Iraq Study Group, but left drawing the conclusions and policy recommendations to the Group itself.

USIP's Role with the ISG

USIP was the facilitating organization for the Iraq Study Group (ISG), co-chaired by James A. Baker, III, and Lee H. Hamilton. As such, USIP is the repository for the ISG’s official report, titled The Iraq Study Group Report: The Way Forward - A New Approach, which was downloaded more than 1.5 million times from USIP's Web site in the first two weeks after the launch of the report on December 6, 2006.

USIP facilitated the bipartisan ISG at the urging of Congress. The ISG’s mandate was to conduct a forward-looking, independent assessment of the current and prospective situation on the ground in Iraq, its impact on the surrounding region, and consequences for U.S. interests. Three organizations supported USIP in its work facilitating the ISG: the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Center for the Study of the Presidency (CSP), and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University.

As facilitator, USIP provided scholarly and logistical support to the ISG. It maintained an in-house Iraq expert committee and external Expert Working Groups that provided the ISG with the briefing papers and policy analyses that helped finalize their conclusions. It also coordinated the ISG’s interviews with top U.S. and foreign officials and led the group’s trip to Iraq in the Summer of 2006.

ISG Quick Stats

Related Publications

Iraq Study Group Fact Sheet

Iraq Study Group Fact Sheet

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

The Iraq Study Group (ISG) was launched on March 15, 2006, at a meeting on Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C. It was created at the direction of a bipartisan group of members of the U.S. Congress. Representative Frank Wolf (R-VA) was the leading supporter of the group’s creation. Wolf had been calling for a “fresh eyes” assessment of the situation in Iraq since the summer of 2005. From its inception, the ISG was designed to be bipartisan, and the initiative attracted broad, bipartisan support among members of the House and Senate.

Type: Fact Sheet

View All

Latest Publications

¿Puede Honduras poner en orden su democracia en el 2025?

¿Puede Honduras poner en orden su democracia en el 2025?

Thursday, November 7, 2024

Días después de acusar a Estados Unidos de presionar a las fuerzas armadas hondureñas para destituirla de su cargo, la presidenta de Honduras, Xiomara Castro, dijo a cientos de seguidores a mediados de septiembre que no permitiría “otro golpe de Estado” en Honduras. Su esposo, Manuel Zelaya, fue destituido en un golpe militar en el 2009. Castro afirmó que el tratado de extradición de 112 años entre EE.UU. y Honduras fue el instrumento que EE.UU. usó para coaccionar a los militares en tal complot, justificando su decisión de terminar unilateralmente el tratado.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & Governance

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Russia’s war against Ukraine has spurred closer cooperation between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific states and organizations, particularly Australia and NATO, signaling a deepening of ties that could have long-term benefits for global security. Over the long term, writes security expert Gorana Grgić, such alignment is crucial for signaling to potential aggressors that global coalitions are prepared to respond. This report analyzes Australia’s response in order to examine Canberra’s strategic thinking with respect to cross-theater cooperation, and it offers recommendations for US, NATO, and Australian policymakers.

Type: Special Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

Can Honduras Get Its Democracy in Order in 2025?

Can Honduras Get Its Democracy in Order in 2025?

Thursday, November 7, 2024

Days after accusing the United States of pressuring the Honduran armed forces into removing her from office, Honduran President Xiomara Castro told hundreds of her followers in mid-September that she would not allow “another coup” to happen in Honduras. Her husband, Manuel Zelaya, was ousted in a 2009 military coup. The 112-year-old U.S.-Honduran extradition treaty, she said, was the instrument used by the U.S. to coerce the military into such a plot, justifying her decision to unilaterally end the treaty.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & Governance

Dean Cheng on What China’s Pressure on Taiwan Means for the Region

Dean Cheng on What China’s Pressure on Taiwan Means for the Region

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

As Beijing ratchets up military pressure along the Strait, Taiwan remains “the one area where we are most likely to see … a direct confrontation between the United States and China” because a conflict “would affect a lot of our allies [like] Japan, South Korea and the Philippines,” says USIP’s Dean Cheng. 

Type: Podcast

La transition en Haïti ne peut réussir sans le leadership des femmes

La transition en Haïti ne peut réussir sans le leadership des femmes

Monday, October 28, 2024

Malgré l’instabilité politique et les bouleversements sociaux les plus graves de son histoire au cours de la dernière décennie, Haïti a désormais l’occasion d’aller de l’avant. La sélection d’un Premier ministre efficace par un Conseil présidentiel de transition offre au pays une chance de rétablir la sécurité et d’organiser des élections pour la première fois depuis 2016. Mais pour que les progrès soient durables, il faudra un mélange de leadership transitoire et de leadership transformationnel. Et cela signifie mobiliser et respecter le rôle essentiel des femmes, qui sont actuellement sous-représentées à tous les niveaux de gouvernement et d’influence.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGender

View All Publications