As Russia’s assault on Ukraine continues, mounting evidence suggests that atrocities, including war crimes and crimes against humanity, are ongoing. Russian forces have already violated numerous norms of international law by invading a sovereign nation, violating cease-fires, shelling humanitarian corridors and targeting civilians — including those seeking shelter in hospitals, schools and residential areas. As Ukrainian armed forces continue to stymie the progress of Russian military efforts, international actors are increasingly warning that Russia may violate those norms even further with the use of chemical weapons.

The Ukrainian government has led efforts to hold Vladimir Putin and Russia accountable for these atrocities, challenging Russian aggression and claims of genocide through the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. The international community has followed suit, with both the U.N. Human Rights Council and the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court opening investigations into alleged crimes committed in Ukraine. Meanwhile, several states, including Germany and Spain, have opened their own investigations into possible war crimes under the principle of universal jurisdiction. 

On March 22, USIP held a discussion on seeking justice for Russian atrocities in Ukraine, the needs of Ukrainian civilians, available accountability mechanisms and the role of multilateral institutions in operationalizing an effective accountability strategy. Can such efforts be successful in holding individuals and state organs perpetrating crimes in Ukraine accountable? Moreover, what strategy should the international community pursue to ensure the highest levels of accountability for crimes committed as part of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine?

Take part in the conversation on Twitter with #UkraineUSIP.

Speakers

Lise Grande, welcoming remarks/moderator
President and CEO, U.S. Institute of Peace

Ambassador Oksana Markarova, opening remarks
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Ukraine to the United States
 
Jane E. Stromseth
Francis Cabell Brown Professor of International Law, Georgetown Law

Curtis R. Ried
Senior Director of Multilateral Affairs, National Security Council

Ambassador William Taylor
Vice President, Russia and Europe, U.S. Institute of Peace; Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine

Related Publications

After Ukraine’s Peace Summit, Widen Consensus With ‘Middle Powers’

After Ukraine’s Peace Summit, Widen Consensus With ‘Middle Powers’

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Last weekend saw the broadest, highest-level international endorsement yet for the principles of Ukraine’s peace proposal to end Russia’s invasion. Ukraine’s first peace summit, in Switzerland, drew 101 countries and international institutions, of which more than 80 signed a declaration endorsing “principles of sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states, including Ukraine.” As Russia counters any such vision with disingenuous and unserious offers to negotiate, Ukraine and its allies could more energetically draw “middle powers,” such as India, Egypt or Saudi Arabia, into the coming round of efforts to shape a viable, just peace process.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

In Pyongyang, Putin and Kim Tighten Ties, Pledge Mutual Defense

In Pyongyang, Putin and Kim Tighten Ties, Pledge Mutual Defense

Thursday, June 20, 2024

As President Vladimir Putin’s illegal war on Ukraine grinds on, the Russian leader needs friends and supporters wherever he can get them. To that end, Putin traveled this week to North Korea for the first time in nearly 25 years, looking to deepen cooperation with the rogue regime and, chiefly, to get more ammunition for his war on Ukraine. Putin and Kim Jong Un inked what the North Korean leader called “the most powerful treaty” ever between the two countries. While strengthened ties between two of Washington’s most enduring adversaries are of unquestioned concern for the U.S., Beijing is also wary of the implications.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Moldova: As Russia Fuels Conflict, Could Churches Build Peace?

Moldova: As Russia Fuels Conflict, Could Churches Build Peace?

Thursday, June 6, 2024

Russia’s escalating campaign to block Moldova from joining the European Union reflects a weakening in Eastern Europe of a longstanding Russian lever of regional influence: its Orthodox church. A number of Moldovan Orthodox priests and parishes are campaigning to withdraw their nation’s churches from two centuries of formal subordination to Russia’s church, and Moldova’s senior prelate has bluntly condemned his superior, the Russian Orthodox Church patriarch, for supporting Moscow’s war on Ukraine. As conflict escalates this year over Moldova’s future, advocates of European democracy and stability might strengthen both by supporting dialogue to reduce conflict between Moldova’s historically Russia-linked church and its smaller rival, subordinate to the Orthodox hierarchy in neighboring Romania.

Type: Analysis

Religion

View All Publications