In a surprise move, the European Union on December 14 agreed to start accession talks with Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described the news as “a victory of Ukraine … a victory that motivates, inspires and strengthens.”

From left: European Council President Charles Michel, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen attend a European Union-Ukraine Summit in Kyiv on February 3, 2023. (Emile Ducke/The New York Times)
From left: European Council President Charles Michel, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen attend a European Union-Ukraine Summit in Kyiv on February 3, 2023. (Emile Ducke/The New York Times)

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who is seen as close to Russian President Vladimir Putin, is vehemently opposed to EU membership for Ukraine. However, Orbán decided to walk out of the room when EU leaders voted on starting accession talks — effectively abstaining from the vote. Orbán later threatened to “slam the brakes” on the accession process. Hours after the accession process vote, Hungary blocked €50 billion in EU aid to Ukraine.

USIP’s Katie Ruppert discussed the significance of EU membership for Ukraine, and the way ahead.

What led the EU to vote in favor of accession talks for Ukraine?

Ruppert: The EU has supported Ukraine’s application for membership since June 2022 when it offered Ukraine (and Moldova) candidate status. The Ukrainians have been working since then to make the changes necessary to progress to the next step in the accession process. 

The EU requires that any prospective member state meet certain political and economic benchmarks to join. These are often extensive and require everything from strong democratic institutions to an independent judiciary to a competitive, vibrant financial system. In its recommendation, the EU cited significant progress on these benchmarks since 2014.

It’s really a testament to the Ukrainian government and the Ukrainian people that they were able to complete so many reforms at such a record pace. All but one EU member — Hungary — agreed on December 14 that Ukraine was ready to progress to the next step — actual negotiations leading to membership. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán had threatened to stop this decision, but the collective pressure of the other 26 members forced him to back down and allow the decision to go forward. This is a monumental step on Ukraine’s path to Europe and away from Russia.

What benefits will Ukraine get from EU membership?

Ruppert: Beyond the obvious economic and social benefits, EU membership locks Ukraine into Europe, forever precluding Russia from controlling Ukraine as Vladimir Putin is obsessed with doing. Ukraine belongs in Europe.

What are the next steps in the membership process? Is it smooth sailing from now on for Ukraine?

Ruppert: Accession is a yearslong process, but the Ukrainians are absolutely determined to get there — they say in two years. The European Commission’s report cited that Ukraine still needs to work on judicial reforms and strengthening its economy to better function within EU economic institutions, although the commission itself acknowledged that the latter is largely due to the conflict.

Are there implications for Ukraine’s NATO ambitions?

Ruppert: It definitely helps. Ukraine has just received formal approval from EU members that it is on the right path on reforms and that Brussels and member states want to welcome it fully into the European community. With the EU membership momentum, Ukraine is looking toward the NATO summit in Washington next July to receive an invitation to begin negotiations that would lead to NATO membership when the war ends.

There are different requirements for EU membership and NATO membership — one is more focused on political and economic and the other on military and security — but it’s definitely a boost for Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic ambitions.


Related Publications

After Ukraine’s Peace Summit, Widen Consensus With ‘Middle Powers’

After Ukraine’s Peace Summit, Widen Consensus With ‘Middle Powers’

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Last weekend saw the broadest, highest-level international endorsement yet for the principles of Ukraine’s peace proposal to end Russia’s invasion. Ukraine’s first peace summit, in Switzerland, drew 101 countries and international institutions, of which more than 80 signed a declaration endorsing “principles of sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states, including Ukraine.” As Russia counters any such vision with disingenuous and unserious offers to negotiate, Ukraine and its allies could more energetically draw “middle powers,” such as India, Egypt or Saudi Arabia, into the coming round of efforts to shape a viable, just peace process.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

In Pyongyang, Putin and Kim Tighten Ties, Pledge Mutual Defense

In Pyongyang, Putin and Kim Tighten Ties, Pledge Mutual Defense

Thursday, June 20, 2024

As President Vladimir Putin’s illegal war on Ukraine grinds on, the Russian leader needs friends and supporters wherever he can get them. To that end, Putin traveled this week to North Korea for the first time in nearly 25 years, looking to deepen cooperation with the rogue regime and, chiefly, to get more ammunition for his war on Ukraine. Putin and Kim Jong Un inked what the North Korean leader called “the most powerful treaty” ever between the two countries. While strengthened ties between two of Washington’s most enduring adversaries are of unquestioned concern for the U.S., Beijing is also wary of the implications.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Moldova: As Russia Fuels Conflict, Could Churches Build Peace?

Moldova: As Russia Fuels Conflict, Could Churches Build Peace?

Thursday, June 6, 2024

Russia’s escalating campaign to block Moldova from joining the European Union reflects a weakening in Eastern Europe of a longstanding Russian lever of regional influence: its Orthodox church. A number of Moldovan Orthodox priests and parishes are campaigning to withdraw their nation’s churches from two centuries of formal subordination to Russia’s church, and Moldova’s senior prelate has bluntly condemned his superior, the Russian Orthodox Church patriarch, for supporting Moscow’s war on Ukraine. As conflict escalates this year over Moldova’s future, advocates of European democracy and stability might strengthen both by supporting dialogue to reduce conflict between Moldova’s historically Russia-linked church and its smaller rival, subordinate to the Orthodox hierarchy in neighboring Romania.

Type: Analysis

Religion

View All Publications