Japan’s history of colonialism and wartime aggression remains a critical issue in relations between Asian countries. Prime Minister Abe's recent statement on women coerced into servitude has drawn official protests from governments in the region and the denunciation of victims' rights groups.

On March 30th, a diverse group of Japanese, South Korean and American scholars and activists will present their views and experiences related to dealing with the past and promoting justice and accountability in Japan and reconciliation in East Asia. They will examine how and whether public education, memorialization, and legal advocacy efforts have contributed to reconciliation efforts and an understanding of the past.

Archived Audio

To listen to audio or to view video, please click on the links provided below. You also can right click on the links and choose "Save Target As" or "Download Linked File." This will save the file to your computer and then allow you to play it in your media player directly. More Audio Help.

Agenda

9:00 – 9:15 AM - Registration

9:15 – 9:30 AM - Welcoming Remarks by Richard Solomon, President, USIP

9:30 – 10:45 AM - Panel I: Reparation, Reconciliation, and History Education

  • Hiroshi Oyama (Attorney and Advocate)
    Oyama will discuss the role of law in reconciliation. He will also discuss achievements and challenges he has experienced in bringing compensation lawsuits.
  • Shin’ichi Arai (Professor Emeritus, Department of History, Suruga University; WWII Veteran)
    Arai will examine how the Chinese, Japanese and South Korean governments have dealt with the legacy of Japan’s wartime atrocities since 1945. By comparing regional and historical differences, he will underscore how international and domestic political environments have influenced official debates regarding war crimes and reparations.
  • Tokushi Kasahara (Professor of Chinese History, Tsuru Bunka University)
    Kasahara will compare different descriptions of the Nanjing Massacre in China and Japan. He will analyze the role of nationalism in history education in both countries and its impact on the process of reconciliation.

    Moderator: Jeff Helsing, Deputy Director of Education, USIP

10:45 – 11:00 AM - Break

 

11:00 – 12:00 Noon - Discussion Session One

  • Panel Discussant: Daqing Yang, Department of History, George Washington University
    A question and answer session will follow.

12:00 – 1:30 PM - Light Lunch and Address

  • Rear Admiral Michael McDevitt (USN-Ret.)
    Director of the Center for Strategic Studies for the CNA Corporation.

1:30 – 2:45 PM - Panel II: The Role of Museums in Education and Reconciliation

  • Takashi Yoshida (Senior Fellow, USIP)
    Yoshida will provide a broad historical background of postwar Japanese peace activism and museums as well as discuss the changing role of the Yasukuni Shrine's Yushukan War Musuem from the 1930s to the present.
  • Rumiko Nishino (Director, Women's Active Museum on War and Peace)
    Nishino will share her experiences from opening a small private museum that highlights various forms of violence against women.
  • Yeonghwan Kim (Associate Director of Grassroots House Peace Museum)
    Kim has organized week-long fieldwork programs in which college students excavate the bones of slave laborers in coal mines in Hokkaido. Hundreds of college students, mainly from Japan and South Korea, have participated in the fieldwork. Kim will speak of his experiences in order to offer clues as to possible approaches to facilitating reconciliation in East Asia.

    Moderator: Judy Barsalou, Vice President, Grants and Fellows Program, USIP

2:45 – 3:00 PM - Break

3:00 – 4:00 PM - Discussion Session Two

  • Panel Discussant: Soon Won Park, Department of History, George Mason University
    A question and answer session will follow.

4:00 – 4:30 PM - Concluding Remarks

4:30 – 5:30 PM - Reception

Latest Publications

As Russia Builds Influence in Africa, its Church Takes a Role

As Russia Builds Influence in Africa, its Church Takes a Role

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

Vladimir Putin’s campaign to make the world safe for violent authoritarianism visibly exploits conflicts and bolsters military rule in Africa with mercenary armies, internet-borne disinformation and weaponized corruption. A less recognized Russian effort to build influence in Africa is an expansion across the continent of the Russian Orthodox Church. As the Russian church’s overt support for Putin’s war on Ukraine has corroded its influence in the traditionally Orthodox Christian world, the Moscow Patriarchate is opening parishes and hiring priests away from the established African church.

Type: Analysis

ReligionGlobal Policy

Cómo Puede Contribuir EE.UU. a la Resolución del Conflicto en Venezuela

Cómo Puede Contribuir EE.UU. a la Resolución del Conflicto en Venezuela

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

El reciente anuncio de negociaciones directas entre Venezuela y Estados Unidos fue recibido con agrado por muchos venezolanos como una oportunidad para aumentar las posibilidades de que las elecciones del 28 de julio se desarrollen pacíficamente y conduzcan a un futuro de coexistencia democrática. Sin embargo, la clave de este resultado dependerá menos de las cuestiones tácticas electorales —como los incentivos para no anular la candidatura de la oposición— y más de la cuestión más amplia de asegurar que no habrá persecución del perdedor y que ambas partes puedan volver a la alternancia del poder en lugar de un régimen de partido único. EE.UU. está en una posición clave tanto para influir en el ambiente general de las elecciones como para tomar acciones específicas que faciliten un resultado democrático, que se desarrollará a lo largo de un período post-electoral extendido.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What the Houthi-Israel Exchange Might Mean for Escalation in the Middle East

What the Houthi-Israel Exchange Might Mean for Escalation in the Middle East

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

The Middle East saw yet another escalatory episode over the weekend, as Israel and Yemen’s Houthis exchanged fire. On July 19, the Iran-backed Houthis launched an unprecedented drone attack on Israel, which hit an apartment building in downtown Tel Aviv, killing one and injuring at least 10 others. It was the first time that the Houthis killed or even harmed an Israeli, despite launching dozens of missile attacks on Israel since October 7. The next day, Israel struck back with an airstrike on the strategic port of Hodeida, marking the first time it attacked Yemen. The Israeli attack killed six, injured dozens more and left ablaze key oil facilities in the area.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

How the U.S. Can Contribute to Resolving the Venezuelan Conflict

How the U.S. Can Contribute to Resolving the Venezuelan Conflict

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

The recent announcement of direct negotiations between Venezuela and the United States was welcomed by many Venezuelans as an opportunity to bolster the chances of the July 28 election playing out peacefully and leading to a future of democratic co-existence. The key to this outcome, however, will hinge less on the tactical electoral questions — such as incentives for not annulling the opposition’s electoral ticket — and more on the larger question of ensuring there will be no persecution of the loser and that the two sides can return to the alternation of power rather than single party rule. The U.S. is in key a position to both influence the general ambiance of the election and to take specific actions that will facilitate a democratic outcome, which will play out over an extended post-electoral period.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

 70 Years After the Geneva Conference: Why is the Korean Peninsula No Closer to Peace?

70 Years After the Geneva Conference: Why is the Korean Peninsula No Closer to Peace?

Monday, July 22, 2024

July marks the anniversary of the 1953 armistice agreement that ended the Korean War and the 1954 Geneva Conference, convened to resolve the issues that the war could not. In the seven decades since, efforts to achieve peace on the Korean Peninsula have been limited and flawed. Today, the security situation in the region is arguably more precarious than ever, with a nuclear armed-North Korea and dysfunctional great power relations. Recent foreign policy shifts in North Korea do not augur well for peace in the near term. Thus, even moving the needle toward peace will likely require Washington to undertake bold initiatives.

Type: Question and Answer

Mediation, Negotiation & DialoguePeace Processes

View All Publications