This Special Report, authored by Program Officer Scott Snyder, is based on meetings of the working group that focused on political, economic, and security developments in North and South Korea.

About the Working Group

The United States Institute of Peace has held an ongoing series of working group meetings on U.S. policy toward the Korean peninsula since fall 1993, when a group was convened to examine policy options for dealing with the North Korean nuclear challenge.

Two Special Reports were issued in 1994. The first report, North Korea's Nuclear Program: Challenge and Opportunity for American Policy, addressed strategic and organizational aspects of an effort to achieve a negotiated solution to problems posed by North Korea's nuclear program. The second, The North Korean Nuclear Challenge: The Post-Kim Il Sung Phase Begins, provided a preliminary analysis of the Geneva Agreed Framework and examined the challenges posed by the political situation on the Korean peninsula following the death of Kim Il Sung.

A Coming Crisis on the Korean Peninsula?: The Food Crisis, Economic Decline, and Political Considerations, published in October 1996, explored prospective challenges to the coordination of U.S., South Korean, Japanese, and Chinese policies in the context of the difficult circumstances and circumscribed options currently faced by North Korea. North Korea's Decline and China's Strategic Dilemmas, an October 1997 report based on a research trip to the northeast China border with North Korea, analyzed Chinese perspectives on the two Koreas. Beyond the Financial Crisis: Challenges and Opportunities for U.S. Leadership, published in April 1998, detailed political and security implications of the Asian financial crisis.

This Special Report, authored by Program Officer Scott Snyder, is based on meetings of the working group that focused on political, economic, and security developments in North and South Korea. The meetings were held at the United States Institute of Peace in November and December 1997 and March 1998.

The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Institute of Peace, which does not advocate specific policies.


Related Publications

With Russia’s U.N. Veto, Where Do North Korea Sanctions Go From Here?

With Russia’s U.N. Veto, Where Do North Korea Sanctions Go From Here?

Tuesday, July 30, 2024

Earlier this spring, Russia vetoed a U.N. Security Council proposal to extend the “panel of experts” that had been monitoring the implementation of U.N. sanctions on North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs since 2009. While many saw the veto coming, the decision stands to majorly disrupt not just the enforcement of U.N. sanctions on North Korea but could undermine the effectiveness of U.N. sanctions as a whole. USIP spoke with George Lopez, who served previously on the panel in 2010-2011 and again in 2022-2023, about why Russia vetoed the renewal, what the international community loses now that the panel is finished, and what options there might be to replace it.

Type: Question and Answer

EconomicsGlobal Policy

 70 Years After the Geneva Conference: Why is the Korean Peninsula No Closer to Peace?

70 Years After the Geneva Conference: Why is the Korean Peninsula No Closer to Peace?

Monday, July 22, 2024

July marks the anniversary of the 1953 armistice agreement that ended the Korean War and the 1954 Geneva Conference, convened to resolve the issues that the war could not. In the seven decades since, efforts to achieve peace on the Korean Peninsula have been limited and flawed. Today, the security situation in the region is arguably more precarious than ever, with a nuclear armed-North Korea and dysfunctional great power relations. Recent foreign policy shifts in North Korea do not augur well for peace in the near term. Thus, even moving the needle toward peace will likely require Washington to undertake bold initiatives.

Type: Question and Answer

Mediation, Negotiation & DialoguePeace Processes

View All Publications