Education plays a critical role in preparing communities for change and has made important contributions to post-conflict reconciliation in numerous war-torn societies, yet education issues have largely been excluded from past efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  A new USIP report argues why an education track should be included in the negotiations phase and in the text of an agreement itself, and puts forward practical recommendations on how Israelis and Palestinians – and the international community – can move forward with a successful peace process that incorporates education.

An Education Track for the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process

Overview

President Barack Obama declared in his June 4th address at Cairo University that "all of us must recognize that education and innovation will be the currency of the 21st century."  Education plays a critical role in preparing communities for change. This is especially relevant regarding Israeli-Palestian peace efforts. Indeed, education can be an important component to foster positive change in social values, attitudes and skills that are necessary to overcome years of painful conflict. Alternatively, education can reinforce conflict-producing myths and stereotypes, serving as a battleground where social groups are all too often demonized. Education has been able to make an important contribution to reconciliation, conflict prevention, post-conflict reconstruction, and the re-building of war-torn societies, including in Northern Ireland, South Africa, as well as France and Germany after World War II, or in Poland and the Baltic States after the end of the Cold War. Yet, educational issues have largely been excluded from past efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A new USIPeace Briefing examines how the parties and international mediators can create an education track for the peace process that would create opportunities for more effective mediation and increase the chances for success of the process overall. The report recommends ways third party mediators can assist Israelis and Palestinians by addressing education in the peace agreement itself; building a role in the respective ministries to address the effects of the continuing violent conflict; and developing mechanisms in which frustrations arising from implementing a peace agreement itself can be discussed and facilitated within the network of schools. Authors Barbara Zasloff, Adina Shapiro, and USIP’s A. Heather Coyne argue how teachers and schools can play vital roles in defusing tensions and helping the youth understand their evolving environment and find places for themselves within it. Positioned to change attitudes and teach new skills, schools have exceptional outreach to all levels of society, the authors conclude.

About the Authors

This USIPeace Briefing was written by A. Heather Coyne, a senior program officer in the Center for Mediation and Conflict Resolution at the United States Institute of Peace, Barbara Zasloff, founder and president of the International Center for Contemporary Education which promotes responsible citizenship through education and currently administers programs in Israel and in Gaza, and Adina Shapiro, who co-managed a joint Palestinian-Israeli education NGO.


Related Publications

Palestinian Factions Pledge Unity: Another Diplomatic Win for China?

Palestinian Factions Pledge Unity: Another Diplomatic Win for China?

Thursday, July 25, 2024

Hamas, Fatah and a dozen smaller Palestinian factions signed on Tuesday in Beijing a joint statement calling for, among other things, the formation of a national unity government. Fatah, the secular party that controls the Palestinian Authority, and Hamas, which perpetrated the October 7 terrorist attack that led to the ongoing war in Gaza, have been divided since 2007. Their rivalry has long been a thorn in the side of the Palestinian cause and numerous attempts at reconciliation have failed. This latest attempt comes as efforts to devise a post-war governance system for Gaza are picking up steam.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyReconciliation

What the Houthi-Israel Exchange Might Mean for Escalation in the Middle East

What the Houthi-Israel Exchange Might Mean for Escalation in the Middle East

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

The Middle East saw yet another escalatory episode over the weekend, as Israel and Yemen’s Houthis exchanged fire. On July 19, the Iran-backed Houthis launched an unprecedented drone attack on Israel, which hit an apartment building in downtown Tel Aviv, killing one and injuring at least 10 others. It was the first time that the Houthis killed or even harmed an Israeli, despite launching dozens of missile attacks on Israel since October 7. The next day, Israel struck back with an airstrike on the strategic port of Hodeida, marking the first time it attacked Yemen. The Israeli attack killed six, injured dozens more and left ablaze key oil facilities in the area.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Israel and Hezbollah Change the Rules, Test Redlines — Will it lead to War?

Israel and Hezbollah Change the Rules, Test Redlines — Will it lead to War?

Wednesday, June 26, 2024

Tensions between Israel and the Lebanese Shia militia Hezbollah are at their highest point since their 2006 war. They have exchanged tit-for-tat attacks since October, displacing tens of thousands from northern Israel and southern Lebanon. But in recent weeks, both sides have escalated the violence and rhetoric. USIP’s Mona Yacoubian looks at what’s driving this escalation, what each side is trying to tell the other and the diplomatic efforts underway to lower the temperature.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Gaza at the G7: The Daunting Divide between Rhetoric and Reality

Gaza at the G7: The Daunting Divide between Rhetoric and Reality

Thursday, June 20, 2024

The ongoing war in Gaza was only one of several items on the agenda for last week’s summit of leading Western economies, known as the Group of 7 (G7). But, given the global attention on Gaza and coming on the heels of the Biden administration’s most recent push to achieve a cease-fire — including sponsorship of a U.N. Security Council resolution toward that end — questions around the prospects for a negotiated pause in fighting and hostage agreement dominated the discussions.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications