Nuclear weapon-free states can establish a new regional security framework through the strengthening of existing and creation of new Nuclear Weapon-Free Zones (NWFZs). These zones operate under the assumption that more nuclear weapons make the world inherently less safe and demonstrate that countries do not need nuclear weapons to deter attack.

24

Summary

  • Deterrence is an outdated approach to the threat of nuclear weapons and does not meet the security needs of the post-Cold War era.
  • Nuclear weapon-free states can establish a new regional security framework through the strengthening of existing and creation of new Nuclear Weapon-Free Zones (NWFZs). These zones operate under the assumption that more nuclear weapons make the world inherently less safe and demonstrate that countries do not need nuclear weapons to deter attack.
  • The sanctioned nuclear weapon states have not signed certain provisions in the five existing NWFZ treaties, citing specific concerns about the negative security assurance clauses, which state that any signatory nation to a NWFZ treaty will not use or threaten to use a nuclear weapon against a member state. This undermines the existing zones and can, in fact, reward those who develop a nuclear weapon outside the established framework.
  • Nuclear weapon states should provide greater incentives for joining existing zones and pursue new nuclear weapon-free zones in the Middle East and Arctic regions.

About This Brief

The United States Institute of Peace and the Elliott School of International Affairs at the George Washington University co-sponsored a conference in March 2010 on "The Contribution of Nuclear Weapon-Free Zones to the Global Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament Regime." The conference explored numerous aspects of NWFZs including challenges to creating NWFZs, peaceful nuclear energy development within zones and coordination among the zones for global disarmament. To view the keynote address from the conference, given by Jennings Randolph Senior Visiting Scholar Amb. Jayantha Dhanapala, please visit http://www.usip.org/events/nuclear-weapon-free-zones. Janene Sawers, the author of this Peace Brief, is a senior program assistant with the Jennings Randolph Fellowship Program for International Peace.


Related Publications

How America’s Trade Program with Africa Bolsters Security and Peace

How America’s Trade Program with Africa Bolsters Security and Peace

Thursday, August 1, 2024

America’s security and global influence in this 21st century will be significantly impacted by the world’s fastest-growing and changing region: Africa. A bipartisan consensus among U.S. foreign policy leaders is pressing the United States to intensify its engagements across the continent to counter rising violence and instability that is often rooted in poor governance and unmet human needs. Yet next year, America risks losing a powerful, cost-effective tool for building U.S.-African partnership, peace and prosperity. Last week, a gathering at USIP of African and U.S. business and policy leaders sharpened and bolstered critical arguments for renewing and enhancing this vital instrument: the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGlobal Policy

As Moldova Nears an Election, Russia Exploits an Unhealed Ethnic Rift

As Moldova Nears an Election, Russia Exploits an Unhealed Ethnic Rift

Thursday, August 1, 2024

In 2024, Russia’s hybrid war on Europe is notably targeting tiny Moldova, which, like Ukraine, is struggling for full independence from centuries of domination by Moscow. Specifically, Vladimir Putin’s government is campaigning to scuttle Moldova’s decision to join the European Union — and one strategy is to sustain opposition by the country’s minority Gagauz community. In just 11 weeks, Moldovans will vote whether to re-elect their pro-Europe president and ratify her government’s European choice. The Kremlin is sponsoring an opposition campaign that appears certain to lose those votes; Moscow may try instead to undermine the elections’ credibility, partly through political manipulation among the Gagauz.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

With Russia’s U.N. Veto, Where Do North Korea Sanctions Go From Here?

With Russia’s U.N. Veto, Where Do North Korea Sanctions Go From Here?

Tuesday, July 30, 2024

Earlier this spring, Russia vetoed a U.N. Security Council proposal to extend the “panel of experts” that had been monitoring the implementation of U.N. sanctions on North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs since 2009. While many saw the veto coming, the decision stands to majorly disrupt not just the enforcement of U.N. sanctions on North Korea but could undermine the effectiveness of U.N. sanctions as a whole. USIP spoke with George Lopez, who served previously on the panel in 2010-2011 and again in 2022-2023, about why Russia vetoed the renewal, what the international community loses now that the panel is finished, and what options there might be to replace it.

Type: Question and Answer

EconomicsGlobal Policy

Panama, Ecuador, and China: The Dangers of Short-Term Calculations

Panama, Ecuador, and China: The Dangers of Short-Term Calculations

Tuesday, July 30, 2024

The People’s Republic of China has become a significant political and economic force in Latin America and the Caribbean, and engagement with Beijing frequently means more compromise than partnership. This report focuses on Panama and Ecuador, two small but strategically important nations in the region where China has held out the promise of economic benefits in exchange for support for its global ambitions. The report discusses the pragmatic implications of this situation and offers recommendations for Latin American and US policymakers.

Type: Special Report

EconomicsGlobal Policy

View All Publications