Ambassador William Taylor shares his review of the relationship between Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2010 and provides a glimpse into what we can expect from these two countries in 2011.

c

Looking back at Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2010, what are the key issues that stand out from the year in terms of U.S. policy?

The two standouts in U.S. policy are the relationships with the two governments. The relationship with the government of President Karzai went through ups and downs: tensions after the disputed presidential election and other official corruption lingered; good feelings from a successful Karzai visit to Washington in the spring improved the mood; questions about the durability of U.S. support generated by Bob Woodward’s book didn’t help; uncertainty about the meaning of the July 2011 date detracted from the U.S. effort; and the emergence of 2014 as the new target date for full hand-off of security to Afghan forces reassured the Afghans and worried their enemies. The relationship with the Pakistani government was strained over continued Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) support for insurgents killing Afghans, Americans and Indians.

Back to Top

What should we be looking to in 2011?

In 2011 we should watch these same two relationships. If U.S.-Afghan relations are going well - more consistency from the Americans, less corruption from the Afghans - we could see real progress toward stability in Afghanistan. If Afghans, Pakistanis and insurgents all come to believe that U.S. and coalition forces will be pressing the enemy for four more years as NATO leaders promised this fall, the game could change. Afghans could swing to turn their own army and ISAF forces away from the Taliban; confidence in the ability of Afghan security forces to control their territory could grow; Pakistanis could gain confidence that the U.S. would not abandon them again - like we did in 1989 - and begin to reign in the terrorist groups they have been supporting as a hedge; and the Taliban could lose support, recruits and the will to fight. But, none of this is guaranteed - it could go badly as well. It will be an interesting year.

Back to Top

Explore


Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications