With much anticipated parliamentary elections scheduled to take place less in Egypt less than a week from now, what are the political implications of the current unrest taking place in Cairo and elsewhere in the country?

November 23, 2011

With much anticipated parliamentary elections scheduled to take place less in Egypt less than a week from now, what are the political implications of the current unrest taking place in Cairo and elsewhere in the country?

With voting set to start on November 28th -- in what is supposed to be Egypt’s first free parliamentary elections in decades – many Egyptians and Egypt-watchers are rightfully concerned about how, or even whether, the voting process will play out as planned. The bloody and lethal unrest that has been playing out in Egypt over the last few days underscores how thin Egyptian patience has run with the military and points to pervasive skepticism toward the ruling military council’s claims of disinterest in long-term power.

Many Egyptians are not prepared to wait much longer to see a transition to civilian rule. They are angered both by the slow pace of the transition and by repressive tactics on the part of the military leadership that smack of “business as usual” seen under the Mubarak regime. Most immediately, it was the Supreme Coucnil of the Armed Forces’ (SCAF) apparent move to dictate terms that would enshrine a protected and guardianship role for themselves in a future Egyptian constitution that brought Egyptians back out to the streets. The violent crackdown has served only to swell the ranks of protesters and provoke international condemnation, and the SCAF has been left scrambling to respond. Field Marshal Tantawi’s announcement on November 22nd that not only would Monday’s parliamentary elections proceed but that a presidential election would be moved forward to no later than July 2012, represents a strong concession to the protesters and speaks to the intense pressure the military is feeling to assure Egyptians that they have no aspirations towards governing the country on a permanent basis. Five days of violent demonstrations that have left over 30 protesters killed and close to 2,000 injured, have seemingly taken their toll.

However, while the SCAF’s November 22nd announcement also included the suggestion of a popular referendum on immediate transfer to civilian power, protesters are not leaving Tahrir Square and instead are pushing for an unconditional end to military rule. While many protesters have accused the SCAF of provoking the violent clashes in order to justify postponing elections, the SCAF’s move seemed designed to emphasize a commitment to a timely transition of power. But continuing unrest raises the possibility of a delay (which itself could spark further instability) or of elections marked by violence and unrest that the police and military have minimal ability to manage.

Back to top

How broadly representative of Egyptian public opinion are the voices in Tahrir Square?

Tantawi’s insistence on November 22nd that he would step down if a popular referendum were to call for such a move suggests that SCAF is putting its faith in the millions not out in Tahrir Square, wagering that the protesters do not represent the larger populace. While true that many Egyptians are loathe to embrace further instability and uncertainty, it is also the case that the violent and authoritarian response to the current protests has only served to swell the ranks of those in Tahrir. In fact, while the Muslim Brotherhood officially refused to back the demonstrations currently taking place – concerned about the potential for delaying an electoral process that is likely to reward them with strong representation -- many of the group’s younger members have joined the protesters in the last couple of days. And while many of those in Tahrir (primarily youth who played a strong role in the revolution) have until now opposed the upcoming election timeframe -- precisely because of the perceived advantage that this early date gave to the well-organized Muslim Brotherhood -- increasing numbers of their ranks are reluctantly embracing it as a minimal concrete step on the road to transition.

For others, the only acceptable move by the military remains the full transfer of caretaker power to a civilian government. There are reports that SCAF has accepted the earlier-tendered resignation of the current cabinet and offered the position of interim prime minister to Dr. Mohammed ElBaradei – a leading figure in the liberal opposition. However, ElBaradei is apparently hesitant to accept, given uncertainty over the extent to which the military council would continue to call the shots if remaining at the helm. Meanwhile, results of the just-released University of Maryland's 2011 Annual Arab Public Opinion Poll find that a plurality of Egyptians believe that the military is acting to slow or reverse the gains of the revolution.

To many observers, Tantawi’s speech on November 22nd was reminiscent of the speech the embattled Mubarak gave before being forced to step aside: paternalistic and defiant in tone despite a nod to compromise that did not go far enough. If the protesters consider SCAF’s response to their demands as “too little too late” and continue to stand their ground, the ball of how to manage the situation leading up to the scheduled elections will be in the military council’s court. How they handle it might well determine the soundness of SCAF’s gamble that a majority of the Egyptian electorate stands behind them.

Back to top

Explore Further


Related Publications

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Thursday, June 13, 2024

The Gaza war has strained Egyptian-Israeli relations to an unprecedented level and raised questions about the future of their 1979 peace treaty that has been a cornerstone of Arab-Israeli peace. U.S. officials met recently in Cairo with their Israeli and Egyptian counterparts against a backdrop of mutually diminishing confidence between the two parties, particularly following Israel’s ground offensive in Rafah. This comes on the heels of a shooting incident between Israeli and Egyptian forces that left at least one Egyptian soldier dead, and Egypt joining South Africa’s case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Along with Qatar, Egypt is a key broker in the current Israel-Hamas cease-fire efforts and engages in extensive security cooperation with the U.S. and Israel.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

For over three decades, every Chinese foreign minister’s first overseas trip of the year has been to Africa. This year continued the tradition with China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, visiting Egypt, Tunisia, Togo and Côte d'Ivoire. Notably, every one of these countries is coastal. And yet, at a time of continued speculation over China’s next military installation in Africa, none of these countries has featured prominently as potential locations in previous analyses. We might, therefore, reasonably ask what China’s current considerations are around basing in Africa. Faced with an increasingly multipolar and assertive Africa at a time of domestic economic challenge, however, China’s long-term strategy remains unclear.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Thursday, January 18, 2024

Since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, Egypt has been heavily involved in efforts to end the military confrontations and wars that have periodically broken out in Gaza. However, the scope, scale and stakes of the current war is unlike any prior round of hostilities. In response to the massacre and hostage-taking of mostly Israeli civilians by Hamas and other militant armed groups during their devastating attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel has launched one of the most destructive wars in its history. Indeed, this war will be transformational in numerous ways, with ramifications for several stakeholders beyond the parties themselves.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

Thursday, August 3, 2023

Amid today’s dismal Israeli-Palestinian context, positive developments have been in short supply. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s June announcement of preliminary approval for the development of the Gaza Marine gas fields provided a rare glimpse of a potential win-win opportunity. For the Palestinians, it could provide a much-needed boost to their lagging economy and the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority (PA). On the Israeli side, it allows the Netanyahu government to claim it is assisting in improving living conditions in Gaza and could lead to less U.S. pressure on issues like settlement expansion. In the big picture, this is another example of how energy is increasingly becoming a focus for potential win-win agreements in the East Mediterranean.

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications