USIP President Richard Solomon introduces Defense Secretary Leon Panetta before he delivered the 2012 Dean Acheson Lecture.

It's a special honor to have Secretary Panetta with us today. He is a unique and distinguished American who gives luster to the Acheson lecture series: an exceptional public servant, a longtime supporter of the Institute of Peace; and as Secretary of Defense, an ex officio member of our Board of Directors.

The Secretary, as a private citizen, was also a supporter of the Institute's permanent headquarters project. This facility – as Chairman West observed – is a monument to our national commitment to building a more peaceful world. Burdened as we have been this past decade by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, it is all the more important to remember that promotion of peace is a fundamental national purpose of our engagement with the world. Peacebuilding requires well-trained and committed professionals, it demands dedicated and risky work, and it requires partnerships. It requires the work of the Institute of Peace.

Before introducing Secretary Panetta, let me say a few things about the Institute's origins, our work, and our partnership with the defense community.

The national need for a "proper peace establishment" was envisioned by first president George Washington as early as 1783. Ultimately however, it took two centuries and the trauma of the Vietnam War to lead Congress to embody Washington's vision in the Institute of Peace legislated into life in 1984. One of the unanticipated aspects of the growth of the Institute, is the active contribution we now make to our country's national security.

Our work with the military today spans the full spectrum of what we do here at USIP– from practical training for service personnel in the skills of conflict management, to collaborations between civilian NGOs and military personnel as they prepare for deployments abroad, to on-the-ground stabilization and reconciliation programs in zones of conflict around the world.

The Institute's activities on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past decade have built strong partnerships throughout the military – among the ranks, with division, brigade, and battalion command staff, and with senior leaders such as Generals Petraeus and Odierno, Admirals Mullen and Roughead.

Senior administration officials, Members of Congress and others often make special requests of the Institute – taking advantage of our unique standing as an independent, bipartisan and agile organization– a center of innovation in matters of conflict management.  We are asked to undertake important policy assessments on issues such as reforming the United Nations, preventing genocidal violence, and reviewing the Quadrennial Defense Review process or our country's strategic posture. The Iraq Study Group was another notable Institute project, and Citizen Panetta was a distinguished member of the Group before he returned to public service.

One of our more recent contributions has been in collaboration with the U.S. Army's Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute. USIP compiled and published the first-ever army field manual on stabilization and reconstruction, a how-to guide for the military and civilians rebuilding countries ravaged by conflict.

The world of the 21st Century presents dramatically new challenges to our national security than was the case in the violent century now past. That is why I believe the most important work of the Institute is yet to come. In the 28 years since the Institute was created, our mission has expanded because the role of the United States as a world leader for security and peace has been transformed.

The Institute's contributions are ever more relevant as we partner with agencies of our government, with other countries, with non-government organizations and with the private sector, in building "whole of community" capacity for conflict management. Today we must deal with a world burdened with the challenges of nuclear proliferation, terrorism, failed states, ethnic and religious conflict, and the instabilities of economic globalization.

As Chairman West has noted, the Dean Acheson lecture series provides a podium for our most important national leaders. So let me say a few words about Leon Panetta.

There are few officials in public service today who have Secretary Panetta's exceptional range of experiences. His 16 years in Congress were followed by service in the Executive Branch as director of the Office of Management and Budget, President Clinton's chief of staff, and subsequently President Obama's director of the CIA and now Secretary of Defense.

Secretary Panetta's public contributions extend well beyond the halls of government. Before he arrived at the CIA, he and his wife Sylvia directed the Panetta Institute for Public Policy, based at California State University.  The Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit center that seeks to instill in young men and women the virtues and the values of public service.

Of all his public service, it is undoubtedly too much to say that the highlights of his career have been his contribution to the Iraq Study Group, and his support for the construction of a permanent headquarters for the Institute of Peace. Yet every day, as I come to work, I see from my office the hallowed ground of the National Cemetery. I see the roof of the Pentagon. And Abe Lincoln is watching us from his memorial – just across the National Mall, close by the Korean War and Vietnam Veterans Memorials.  This dramatic building and its special location, make us ever aware of the challenge and opportunity – indeed the responsibility – to better fulfill our Congressional mandate of making the United States a world leader in peacebuilding.

Secretary Panetta, thank you for giving us your time and wisdom today.  Please join me in welcoming the 23rd secretary of defense.


Latest Publications

En Venezuela, la acción no violenta es clave para una transición democrática negociada

En Venezuela, la acción no violenta es clave para una transición democrática negociada

Thursday, August 15, 2024

El 28 de julio, Venezuela celebró una de las elecciones más importantes de su historia. La oposición política del país, liderada por María Corina Machado, superó la desilusión popular, las divisiones políticas y un sistema electoral amañado para obtener una aplastante victoria para su candidato de unidad, Edmundo González Urrutia. Según un grupo de la sociedad civil, los cálculos «extrapolados de los recibos oficiales del conteo de votos» de una muestra representativa de centros de votación locales otorgan a González el 66% de los votos. La oposición venezolana respondió al momento con una inspirada campaña prodemocracia.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceMediation, Negotiation & DialogueNonviolent Action

Maduro afirma victoria en una elección disputada, devolviendo a Venezuela al punto cero

Maduro afirma victoria en una elección disputada, devolviendo a Venezuela al punto cero

Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Después de meses de arduas negociaciones y diplomacia entre el régimen de Maduro, la oposición venezolana y la comunidad internacional, los venezolanos finalmente acudieron a las urnas en las elecciones presidenciales del país el pasado domingo. Las encuestas habían mostrado consistentemente al candidato opositor Edmundo González camino a una victoria aplastante, y los datos del día de la elección revelaron que los votantes estaban dispuestos a poner fin a más de una década de control de Nicolás Maduro sobre el país.

Type: Question and Answer

Democracy & Governance

How Fumio Kishida Shaped Japan’s Foreign Policy

How Fumio Kishida Shaped Japan’s Foreign Policy

Thursday, August 22, 2024

Earlier this month, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida made the surprise announcement that he would not seek another term. Although he was prime minister for less than four years, Kishida’s foreign policy legacy spans strategic and tactical advances in Japan’s defense and diplomatic posture. His approach represented both a continuation of and divergence from the legacy of his former boss, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, under whom Kishida acted as Japan’s longest-serving foreign minister. Although Kishida’s successes on foreign affairs were overshadowed by domestic political scandals involving his Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), as well as lack-luster economic growth, he oversaw increases in Japan’s reputation and popularity in the region and globally, as well as the institutionalization of related partnership gains.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Southeast Asia Web Scams Reach U.S., Setting Off Alarms for Law Enforcement

Southeast Asia Web Scams Reach U.S., Setting Off Alarms for Law Enforcement

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

From their base in ungoverned stretches of Southeast Asia, international criminal networks are prowling the Internet, seeking to defraud victims around the world with sophisticated and psychologically devastating scams. Gangsters operating out of Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos, relying on forced labor, have spread their tentacles through Asia, Africa and Latin America and increasingly within the United States, stripping gullible prey of at least $64 billion annually. Clearly, to eradicate such a global menace will require a coordinated international response. Even so, the United States is not internally powerless to confront this striking example of how conflict and corrupt governance in distant parts of the world can directly threaten Americans’ security and well-being.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGlobal Policy

Why Is the U.S. Deploying Long-Range Missiles in Germany?

Why Is the U.S. Deploying Long-Range Missiles in Germany?

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

On the sidelines of last month’s NATO summit, the United States and Germany announced that Washington will begin episodic deployments of long-range conventional capabilities to Germany. In 1987, the United States and Soviet Union agreed to eliminate these systems under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, but Russia’s violations led the United States to withdraw from the treaty in 2019. Three years later, Russia invaded Ukraine and has engaged in nuclear saber-rattling since then. Washington plans to deploy these systems to strengthen deterrence, but Moscow has criticized them.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications