USIP has established a program, Capacity-Building and Dialogues for Afghan Women, in an effort to reach beyond the capital Kabul and help prepare women elsewhere to play a role in peace and post-conflict processes.

USIP Working to Consolidate Gains of Women and Girls in Afghanistan

In an effort to reach beyond the capital Kabul and help prepare women elsewhere to play a role in peace and post-conflict processes, the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) last month began training women leaders from two troubled Afghan provinces. Those trained will later facilitate dialogues among other women from districts in their provinces.

The program, called Capacity-Building and Dialogues for Afghan Women, is headed by USIP's Mary Hope Schwoebel, a senior program officer in its Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding and a specialist in Africa, Latin America and South Asia through her past work in nongovernmental organizations and universities. Schwoebel says the new USIP effort, which follows an earlier dialogue program across the Afghan and Pakistani border, recognizes that gains for Afghan women and girls in post-Taliban Afghanistan, though significant, are limited and need to be protected and consolidated as the Afghan society and government move beyond the period during which they have been able to count on a significant international presence.

"The million-dollar question is how to sustain those gains when the U.S. and international community leave," Schwoebel said. "This project really focuses on the women in the provinces. We need to make sure that the gains extend beyond Kabul. There is also a need to strengthen the linkages between women leaders in Kabul and women leaders in the provinces."

Eighteen women from two conservative provinces, Wardak and Ghazni, received a week of USIP training in mid-June in Kabul in facilitating dialogues, with topics including building understanding and respecting diverse perspectives, building consensus and encouraging collaboration across groups. The women include district- and provincial-level professional women, including teachers, public health workers and local female government officials. They received training from Schwoebel and USIP Senior Program Officer Alison Milofsky with the intention of preparing them to serve as dialogue facilitators within their provinces. The funding comes from the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The women range across ethnic and sectarian groups and come from different political persuasions and age groups. One leader of a civil society organization in Ghazni said, "You need to do these dialogues everywhere in Afghanistan. This is what we women, we Afghans, need. We need to understand each other. I never get to talk to some women because I only know Pashto. But in the workshop, we could talk to each other because you had Pashto and Dari translators."

Added a respected women's leader from Wardak, "In the workshop we talked to each other and we listened to each other. It made me feel like I might be able to change my life. I might even be able to improve life for other people from my community."

The sessions, said Schwoebel, focused on "identifying common ground as women" despite their many differences. Schwoebel says that the June trainings suggested that opportunities for finding common ground exist with such issues as preventing violence against women and children and women's rights to work and study outside the home. One issue that was raised was that of household violence by women against women—for example, abuse of daughter-in-laws by their mother-in-laws. The USIP sessions also aimed at forging links between the rural Afghan women and those from Kabul who are involved in national-level peace activities.

The women trained by USIP are expected to run their own set of dialogues for other women from districts in their provinces in September.

Building the capacity of provincial and district Afghan women not only promotes their ability to protect women's rights in a country in transition, notes Schwoebel. It is intended to strengthen overall efforts to bolster peace and security—to the benefit of Afghans and the international community alike. "Women are much more likely to reach across identity-based social divisions to understand their common interests in peace, security and development," she said. "When women are divided, they can't advocate for their rights, and their potential to support wider peace efforts is diminished."

Explore Further

 


Related Publications

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

At the end of June, envoys and representatives from more than 25 countries and international organizations gathered in Doha, Qatar, along with representatives from the Taliban under an U.N.-facilitated framework. This meeting was the third of its kind, widely referred to as “Doha 3,” and part of a process to establish a more coordinated and coherent global approach to Afghanistan’s challenges and the Taliban’s rule.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications