Andrew Wilder and Moeed Yusuf assess the turnout and results of the first Pakistan election in which a civilian government recognized as democratically elected completed a full term and will hand over to another democratically elected civilian administration.

201305-14PAKISTAN_UNREST_1-event.jpg

In the wake of Pakistan’s general elections held on May 11, USIP experts comment on the vote’s high turnout and discuss the significance of the elections for Pakistan’s democratic future. It was the first Pakistan election in which a civilian government recognized as democratically elected completed a full term and will hand over to another democratically elected civilian administration.

Andrew Wilder, director of USIP’s Afghanistan and Pakistan programs, noted that the high rates of voter participation indicate the public is rejecting militant demands. He said:

“On May 11th approximately 50 million Pakistanis turned out to vote, braving threats of violent attacks by the Pakistani Taliban to stop voters from casting their ballots. The estimated 60 percent turnout rate has only been exceeded once before in Pakistan’s first democratic national elections in 1970, and this resounding rejection of the demands of militants not to vote strongly signals the strong preference of most Pakistanis for a democratic future.”

Watching the events in Pakistan, USIP South Asia Advisor Moeed Yusuf was encouraged by the high level of involvement despite violence in parts of the country during the run-up to election day:

“In what were easily the most unpredictable elections in Pakistan's history, the sense of excitement and involvement was just fantastic to watch. Democracy has been the real winner!”

Yusuf also commented on the results of the elections, which news reports say appear to give a majority to the Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) of former two-time Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. Yusuf said:

“The ranking of the parties was largely expected, but the margin of victory for PML-N was rather surprising. Overall, a good mix of results, which will force the main parties to work together.”

On May 14, USIP will hosted a public discussion, “Pakistan's 2013 Elections: Assessing the Results and Impacts.” The panel discussion featured Safiya Ghori-Ahmad from the Pakistan Desk at the U.S. Department of State; Arif Rafiq, adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute; and Moeed Yusuf and Andrew Wilder.


Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications