Ted Feifer and Mike Lekson of the Education and Training Center/ International conducted the Institute's seventh workshop on negotiation skills in multilateral diplomacy for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in Vienna, June 8-10, 2009.

Ted Feifer and Mike Lekson of the Education and Training Center/ International conducted the Institute's seventh workshop on negotiation skills in multilateral diplomacy for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in Vienna, June 8-10, 2009.  Participants came from national delegations to the OSCE (Kazakhstan, Norway, Hungary, France, the Netherlands, and the U.S.), and from the Office of the OSCE Secretary General. The two participating Kazakhs are Foreign Ministry officers who will be serving in their country's delegation while Kazakhstan holds the OSCE chairmanship in 2010.

Workshop objectives were to strengthen participants' analytical, negotiation, and planning skills used in multilateral diplomacy, and to increase their understanding of and ability to use the multilateral process to achieve their objectives more effectively.  The workshop was completely reorganized and new materials were introduced this year. 

The workshop engaged participants in a true-false discussion of the similarities and differences between bilateral and multilateral negotiation; demonstrated the challenges in multilateral diplomacy in a communication exercise; used a video excerpt from the film "The Godfather" to discuss negotiation principles in any situation in which there are multiple parties; used a participant self-assessment on conflict management style to discuss styles as a negotiating tool; challenged participants to respond to common negotiation tactics in one-on-one exercises; and utilized an excerpt from the film "12 Angry Men" to illustrate the emotional pressures in negotiation and how to respond to them. Participants also applied their analytical and diplomatic skills in a complex multilateral simulation based on the management of a 1999 Horn of Africa conflict by the Organization of African Unity.

Participants gave this workshop on multilateral negotiation the highest evaluation it had ever received.  One participant termed the workshop "useful, dynamic and interesting."  Another noted the workshop's "good interaction and materials."  The common negotiation tactics exercise was particularly appreciated.  A participant noted the usefulness of being confronted with and having to react to an interlocutor using these tactics.  The use of video was also an effective tool which, in the words of another participant, added dynamism and allowed them to watch various multilateral interactions and analyze them "from outside."

Related Publications

Back to the Future? Kazakhstan’s Nuclear Choice

Back to the Future? Kazakhstan’s Nuclear Choice

Thursday, October 17, 2024

Although Kazakhstan denuclearized over three decades ago when it split from the Soviet Union, the Central Asian nation held a referendum on October 6 over whether it should build a nuclear power plant. With 73% voting yes, the referendum could reverberate beyond Kazakhstan and the Central Asia region. Safe nuclear power would be a boon for Kazakhstan, decreasing its reliance on fossil fuels while increasing economic resilience and helping it to address its immense climate change challenges. There are also important U.S. interests at stake here. The U.S. and Western allies should constructively engage with Kazakhstan, including helping to build a new reactor, to avoid Russian or Chinese control of Kazakhstan’s new nuclear energy sector and its valuable uranium resources.

Type: Analysis

EnvironmentGlobal Policy

China’s Global Security Initiative: Tilting the Balance in Central Asia

China’s Global Security Initiative: Tilting the Balance in Central Asia

Wednesday, August 7, 2024

In recent years, Beijing has been reevaluating its conceptual framework for foreign policy, with a focus on enhancing its role in global governance. With the aim of transforming China into the world's leading country, Chinese leader Xi Jinping has put forward a number of new initiatives — including the Global Security Initiative (GSI) — as a way of creating new formats of cooperation between China and the countries of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Global South.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications