The crisis in Egypt sparked debates about whether the U.S. government failed to anticipate the events.    USIP’s Lawrence Woocher comments on these debates and the role of early warning in preventing conflict and instability.

 

February 11, 2011

The crisis in Egypt sparked debates about whether the U.S. government failed to anticipate the events or if policymakers were warned but failed to respond adequately. USIP’s Lawrence Woocher comments on these debates and the role of early warning in preventing conflict and instability.

What should we make of the differing reports about whether there was good warning about the recent events in Egypt?
These kinds of debates take place after virtually every major world event that appears to catch policymakers flat-footed. To be sure, political incentives are part of the explanation. But in most cases—and I suspect in the case of Egypt’s political instability—there is some truth on both sides of the debate. Analysts can legitimately point to briefings given and warnings issued before the crisis. At the same time, policymakers can legitimately report feeling that they were taken by surprise and that warnings were too general or didn’t stand out among the dozens of reports crossing their desks each day. This state of affairs points to shortcomings in the system of analysis and decision-making as much as to mistakes by any particular governmental agency or official. It also underscores the importance of the early warning function--the collection, analysis and communication of information about signs of potential crisis or conflict—in supporting preventive or preparatory action.

Back to Top

What can be done to improve early warning in the future?
I would highlight two major challenges to improving early warning: (1) anticipating triggers that will tip vulnerable countries into crisis; and, (2) linking forecasting and long-range analysis to current policymaking.

Regarding triggers, there is a limit on what we can possibly know in advance of violent conflicts and acute political crises given the complex nature of these phenomena. Seemingly small events can have outsized effects. Nevertheless, we should be able to learn more from experience, so USIP is supporting new research on triggers.

Linking future-oriented analysis with current policymaking requires shifts in both mindset and government process. Senior decision-makers should think in terms of managing risks of conflict and instability over time, not just responding to immediate events, and they should demand analysis to support this approach. (If, as reported, President Barack Obama requested more long-term analysis, it would be noteworthy since it is more typical for senior decision-makers to dismiss the value of long-term analysis altogether.) Establishing regular decision points about U.S. engagement in fragile but pre-crisis situations can help discipline a preventive orientation and avoid “lock in” to established policies as local conditions change.

Back to Top

Additional Perspectives


Related Publications

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Thursday, June 13, 2024

The Gaza war has strained Egyptian-Israeli relations to an unprecedented level and raised questions about the future of their 1979 peace treaty that has been a cornerstone of Arab-Israeli peace. U.S. officials met recently in Cairo with their Israeli and Egyptian counterparts against a backdrop of mutually diminishing confidence between the two parties, particularly following Israel’s ground offensive in Rafah. This comes on the heels of a shooting incident between Israeli and Egyptian forces that left at least one Egyptian soldier dead, and Egypt joining South Africa’s case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Along with Qatar, Egypt is a key broker in the current Israel-Hamas cease-fire efforts and engages in extensive security cooperation with the U.S. and Israel.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

For over three decades, every Chinese foreign minister’s first overseas trip of the year has been to Africa. This year continued the tradition with China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, visiting Egypt, Tunisia, Togo and Côte d'Ivoire. Notably, every one of these countries is coastal. And yet, at a time of continued speculation over China’s next military installation in Africa, none of these countries has featured prominently as potential locations in previous analyses. We might, therefore, reasonably ask what China’s current considerations are around basing in Africa. Faced with an increasingly multipolar and assertive Africa at a time of domestic economic challenge, however, China’s long-term strategy remains unclear.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Thursday, January 18, 2024

Since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, Egypt has been heavily involved in efforts to end the military confrontations and wars that have periodically broken out in Gaza. However, the scope, scale and stakes of the current war is unlike any prior round of hostilities. In response to the massacre and hostage-taking of mostly Israeli civilians by Hamas and other militant armed groups during their devastating attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel has launched one of the most destructive wars in its history. Indeed, this war will be transformational in numerous ways, with ramifications for several stakeholders beyond the parties themselves.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

Thursday, August 3, 2023

Amid today’s dismal Israeli-Palestinian context, positive developments have been in short supply. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s June announcement of preliminary approval for the development of the Gaza Marine gas fields provided a rare glimpse of a potential win-win opportunity. For the Palestinians, it could provide a much-needed boost to their lagging economy and the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority (PA). On the Israeli side, it allows the Netanyahu government to claim it is assisting in improving living conditions in Gaza and could lead to less U.S. pressure on issues like settlement expansion. In the big picture, this is another example of how energy is increasingly becoming a focus for potential win-win agreements in the East Mediterranean.

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications