20120829-AFGHAN_US_SURGE-TOB.jpg
Photo Credit: The New York Times/ Mauricio Lima

The U.S. Central Command on August 27 released a six-month investigation report on the burning of Korans in Afghanistan last February which sparked riots and deadly violence across Afghanistan. According the military report, a shoddy security sweep of books and documents destined for the incinerator from an Afghan prison was due to miscommunication among the senior leaders at the facility who provided poor guidance to the junior officers. The junior officers had consulted with a translator who said that the majority of the prison’s library collection was extremist literature.

Due to a series of errors, the Army’s investigation cited that junior officers may have tried to burn about 500 copies of the Koran and 1,200 religious texts until local staff stopped the incinerator from functioning.  Afghan officials are demanding that the American soldiers be placed on trial, however the U.S. Army announced that it will take disciplinary action against six soldiers because the actions were unintentional and due to unawareness.

Brigadier General Bryan Watson, investigator and author of the report, stated: “I absolutely reject any suggestion that those involved acted with malicious intent to disrespect the Koran or defame the faith of Islam.” General Watson also wrote, “U.S. service members did not heed the warnings of their [Afghan army] partners is, perhaps, my biggest concern.”  

The Army report also acknowledged a deeply flawed understanding of religion, poor cultural training and a poor command of local language skills.  As The Washington Post’s Craig Whitlock reported, “before their deployment to Afghanistan, the troops were exposed only to about an hour-long PowerPoint presentation about Islam.” 

Indeed, the U.S.’s decade-long presence in Afghanistan raises questions how there can still be basic knowledge gaps in culture, religion, tribal customs and effective civil-military relations.

The defamation of the Koran exemplifies the need to better understand the vital role of religious leaders and communities and their multidimensional function in maintaining peace and stability in their respective communities.  In religious conservative societies, religious actors are key civil society actors, who contribute to the wider field of peacebuilding.  This USIP report highlights the need to have a long-term commitment to a comprehensive approach that focuses on local community while engaging the middle and top levels of religious leadership.

Read the USIP Peace Brief, "The Koran Desecration and the Role of Religion in Conflict"


Related Publications

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications