On December 7-9, 2012, USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding brought together a group of Afghan, Iraqi, Libyan and Tunisian women to build on the findings from a June 2012 Dialogue and to identify common challenges and opportunities across the countries.

Challenges and Opportunities for Women in Transition: An Expert Dialogue with Afghan, Iraqi, Libyan and Tunisian Women
Photo courtesy of NY Times

In June 2012, USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding convened a group of Afghan and Iraqi women leaders in Istanbul to map out practical steps moving forward for women in transitional countries.  The Dialogue was the first of its kind, bringing together a diverse group of women across countries and sectors to discuss shared lessons learned and best practices. Following the completion of the Dialogue in June, the Afghani and Iraqi participants felt that it’s both critical and timely for them to work with the women from the Arab Spring in order to “to amplify the voice of women.”

To maintain the momentum from the Istanbul Dialogue, on December 7-9, 2012, USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding brought together a group of Afghan, Iraqi, Libyan and Tunisian women to build on the findings from the June 2012 Dialogue and to identify common challenges and opportunities across the countries.

An example of a common cross-national opportunity is the critical importance of economic empowerment of women. The participants expressed repeatedly that economic empowerment is essential to women’s progress in all sectors of society and that investments in women yield large social and economic returns. One of the participants from Afghanistan noted that “We women of Afghanistan cannot be looked upon as a charity case.”

Another example of a common opportunity and a challenge is engaging men and religious leaders in enhancing opportunities for women across all sectors. The women all agreed that men and religious elders have a critical role to play in promoting women’s rights and opportunities, yet too often men are thought of as impediments to promoting women’s rights rather than potential defenders and supports of women’s rights. Many other lessons learned were offered in this Dialogue, which will be detailed in a forthcoming special report.


Related Publications

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

At the end of June, envoys and representatives from more than 25 countries and international organizations gathered in Doha, Qatar, along with representatives from the Taliban under an U.N.-facilitated framework. This meeting was the third of its kind, widely referred to as “Doha 3,” and part of a process to establish a more coordinated and coherent global approach to Afghanistan’s challenges and the Taliban’s rule.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications