At the center of the “Passing the Baton 2017” conference, National Security Advisor Susan Rice and her successor, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, exchanged declarations of bipartisan cooperation in their transition—and, to applause, a prolonged handshake. Flynn then laid out a vision for national security policy in the Trump administration in his most extensive public remarks since being named for the position.

Flynn Rice

“General Flynn inherits a vital job at a challenging time,” Rice said in opening the midday session of the Jan. 10 conference. Her remarks commended the “exemplary handoff” from the administration of President George W. Bush to that of President Barack Obama and reviewed the current administration’s challenges on national security. “Americans face a more diverse array of threats, from a more diverse range of sources, than ever … from state actors such as Russia and North Korea to terrorists like ISIL, often enabled by new technologies.  And, it includes transnational threats that can reach our shores—climate change, epidemics like Ebola, or the illicit flow of drugs and weapons.”

In the face of those risks, plus systemic strains to the post-World War II international order, “‎it might be tempting to turn inward,” Rice said. But “we must protect ourselves and the international order we helped build, without subordinating our values or abandoning the alliances, partnerships and cooperation.”

“While it’s no secret that this Administration has profound disagreements with the next one, I intend to make myself available to him, just as my predecessors have for me,” she said. “We are all patriots first and foremost.  Threats to our security and democracy should be above partisanship.”

Rice said she and Flynn, as well as their teams, had met repeatedly to ensure a smooth transition, and her staff had prepared more than 100 briefing memos.

Flynn thanked Rice for her work “to help us be as well-prepared as we can be” to take office. And he underscored the U.S. tradition of cooperative transitions of power, recalling the first passing of authority between political foes—from John Adams to Thomas Jefferson in 1801. Their relationship demonstrated “patriotism and a bipartisan sense of national purpose.”

Peace Through Strength

In the new administration, Flynn said, “the safety of the American people and the security of our nation … is to be supported by an over-arching policy of peace through strength. As we examine and potentially re-baseline our relationships around the globe, we will keep in mind the sacrifices and deep commitments that many of our allies and our partners have made on behalf of our security and our prosperity.”

Flynn added: “In fact, alliances are one of the great tools that we have and the strength of those alliances magnify our own strengths. One of those strengths is the unapologetic defense of liberty. This is the core element of American exceptionalism, and why America must and will remain a superpower,” he said. “We have always been the indispensable nation and we always will be.”

Even in times of trouble, Flynn said, “Americans have always maintained their faith in the uniqueness of our democratic experiment, which produced the greatest force of economic growth and innovation, and the greatest model for liberty, the world has ever known. That has not, and will not, ever change. This is the essence of American leadership. Whether we like it or not, the world needs us, and in fact, demands it.”


Related Publications

China’s Dilemmas Deepen as North Korea Enters Ukraine War

China’s Dilemmas Deepen as North Korea Enters Ukraine War

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Until late October, the big questions about China’s role in the Ukraine conflict centered around whether Beijing would choose to expand its support for Russia to include lethal aid, or if it might engage in more active peacemaking to end the conflict. Then, on November 4, the Pentagon confirmed that North Korea sent more than 10,000 troops to Russia’s Kursk oblast, where Ukraine had captured some territory earlier this year. Days later, the State Department confirmed that North Korean soldiers had begun fighting Ukrainian troops.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

The Ukraine war is taking a new turn with the involvement of North Korean soldiers. Washington estimates that, so far, North Korea has sent approximately 10,000 troops to Russia — around 8,000 of whom have been deployed to the western region of Kursk, where Ukraine seized territory in a surprise attack earlier this year. And as U.S. officials predicted in late October, North Korean troops have reportedly begun engaging in direct combat.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Russia’s war against Ukraine has spurred closer cooperation between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific states and organizations, particularly Australia and NATO, signaling a deepening of ties that could have long-term benefits for global security. Over the long term, writes security expert Gorana Grgić, such alignment is crucial for signaling to potential aggressors that global coalitions are prepared to respond. This report analyzes Australia’s response in order to examine Canberra’s strategic thinking with respect to cross-theater cooperation, and it offers recommendations for US, NATO, and Australian policymakers.

Type: Special Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would be an extremely difficult military, complex operation. China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been thinking seriously since the early 2000s about what such a landing would require. For over two decades, its force development efforts have been focused on the weapons, equipment, doctrine and operational concepts required to conquer the island in the face of full U.S. military intervention. The PLA has made considerable progress toward that goal and may deem itself fully capable by the 2027 force development target set by Xi Jinping.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications