Two days into Ukraine’s unfolding counteroffensive, a soldier just back from one of the first probes into Russian defensive lines called me on WhatsApp, giddy with excitement, to report his unit’s unexpected success. “We were told to push them back 600 meters,” he said, “but we got so little resistance, we pushed them back six kilometers! The Russians were soft!”

Protesters in Kyiv show portraits of Ukrainians, many civilians, seized by Russia in the war. As their army’s counteroffensive has begun, Ukrainians say their will to resist Russian rule has only grown over the war. (Brendan Hoffman/The New York Times)
Protesters in Kyiv show portraits of Ukrainians, many civilians, seized by Russia in the war. As their army’s counteroffensive has begun, Ukrainians say their will to resist Russian rule has only grown over the war. (Brendan Hoffman/The New York Times)

It is way too early to judge the success of the Ukrainian counteroffensive. The Russians have spent months hardening their defenses, so early days will be extraordinarily difficult for the Ukrainians. Last week’s destruction of the Kavkhovka dam will make it even more challenging. But the Ukrainian soldier’s high morale, after 15 months of brutal Russian assaults and atrocities, renewed a question central to this war: Why do the Ukrainians fight?

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other Ukrainian leaders for months have reminded the world of one reason: to make possible the kind of world we all want our children and grandchildren to live in — a rules-based order where powerful nations can’t get away with invading smaller nations. Ukrainians emphasize that they fight for principles embodied in the United Nations Charter — sovereignty and territorial integrity — and for freedom and democracy.

In recent visits to Ukraine with USIP colleagues, American officials, humanitarian assistance providers and others, I have heard a second, deeply visceral root of Ukrainians’ determination — even more powerful now than on the first day of Russia’s invasion. Ukrainians will not live under Russia.

In streets and at dining tables in Kyiv last month, visitors organized by the New York-based Renew Democracy Initiative heard Ukrainians describe a third reason for their fight that seems only to be consolidating under the 15 months of trauma in Ukraine and deepening dictatorship in Russia. That is their determination to obliterate from Ukraine the remnants and corruption of past and present Kremlin rule. Among those who emphasized it was Mustafa Nayyem, the Ukrainian former journalist who helped trigger the 2013 “Revolution of Dignity” that ousted Moscow-aligned President Viktor Yanukovych after he tried to block Ukrainians’ popular determination to move from Russia’s old, imperial sphere of dominance to Europe’s community of democracies. “We are fighting for a new Ukraine,” said Nayyem, now a senior official in charge of rebuilding Ukraine’s war-ravaged infrastructure.

The past 15 months have shown ever more vividly the contrast between a nightmarish subjugation to a corrupt Russian regime and the promises of democracy in league with Europe. “We are escaping our past,” Nayyem said.

The mayor of Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city, echoed that focus on escaping Kremlin corruption. In Washington last month, speaking in careful Ukrainian — no one speaks Russian in public anymore — Mayor Ihor Terekhov said Ukrainians are determined to apply a “wave of transparency and honesty” in shaping their future. Nayyem observed that after the victory, 1 million Ukrainian soldiers will reenter civilian life. They will have no tolerance for corruption.

Among Ukrainians we met in Kyiv, many are in their 30s and 40s. These are people who massed in the streets and squares, the “maidans,” of Ukrainian cities, in that 2013-2014 popular uprising to demand change. Like Nayyem, many of these people are now in Zelenskyy’s government. Former journalists, activists and students, they are now government officials, even ministers, absolutely committed to the new Ukraine.

Others of this generation are fighting on the front lines. A 44-year-old friend — who asked to be named only by his frontline call sign, Morgan — led a squad of protesters on the Maidan in 2014, then later became a senior provincial-level official. As the war approached, he joined the Kyiv territorial defense forces. On February 24, 2022, when the Russians invaded, he took his family to stay with his father in western Ukraine and returned to Kyiv to enlist in the regular army. He is now a lieutenant, fighting on the front lines. Three of us visiting Americans had dinner with him in Kyiv the day before he headed back to the front. “It’s going to be noisy!” he said. His sense of hope and optimism was palpable heading into Ukraine's counteroffensive.

In addition to ministers, generals and lieutenants, we talked to privates, young soldiers visiting from the front and heading back the next day. Among the Ukrainians were two Americans and two Belarusians. They were tired, yet eager to get back to their units. Morale is high.

Ukrainians are united as never before. Opinion polls show 90 percent-plus approval for President Zelenskyy and his refusal to compromise with the Russians. Ukrainian human rights organizations, democracy advocates, humanitarian service organizations, all make the case to Americans and Europeans for military support. Even opposition politicians — several of whom I met in Kyiv last month — support the president. They have concerns about wartime restrictions on media and some political activities, but they are 100 percent behind the president. After the victory, they will ask the hard questions. For now, they are fighting for a new Ukraine.


Related Publications

After Ukraine’s Peace Summit, Widen Consensus With ‘Middle Powers’

After Ukraine’s Peace Summit, Widen Consensus With ‘Middle Powers’

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Last weekend saw the broadest, highest-level international endorsement yet for the principles of Ukraine’s peace proposal to end Russia’s invasion. Ukraine’s first peace summit, in Switzerland, drew 101 countries and international institutions, of which more than 80 signed a declaration endorsing “principles of sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states, including Ukraine.” As Russia counters any such vision with disingenuous and unserious offers to negotiate, Ukraine and its allies could more energetically draw “middle powers,” such as India, Egypt or Saudi Arabia, into the coming round of efforts to shape a viable, just peace process.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

In Pyongyang, Putin and Kim Tighten Ties, Pledge Mutual Defense

In Pyongyang, Putin and Kim Tighten Ties, Pledge Mutual Defense

Thursday, June 20, 2024

As President Vladimir Putin’s illegal war on Ukraine grinds on, the Russian leader needs friends and supporters wherever he can get them. To that end, Putin traveled this week to North Korea for the first time in nearly 25 years, looking to deepen cooperation with the rogue regime and, chiefly, to get more ammunition for his war on Ukraine. Putin and Kim Jong Un inked what the North Korean leader called “the most powerful treaty” ever between the two countries. While strengthened ties between two of Washington’s most enduring adversaries are of unquestioned concern for the U.S., Beijing is also wary of the implications.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Moldova: As Russia Fuels Conflict, Could Churches Build Peace?

Moldova: As Russia Fuels Conflict, Could Churches Build Peace?

Thursday, June 6, 2024

Russia’s escalating campaign to block Moldova from joining the European Union reflects a weakening in Eastern Europe of a longstanding Russian lever of regional influence: its Orthodox church. A number of Moldovan Orthodox priests and parishes are campaigning to withdraw their nation’s churches from two centuries of formal subordination to Russia’s church, and Moldova’s senior prelate has bluntly condemned his superior, the Russian Orthodox Church patriarch, for supporting Moscow’s war on Ukraine. As conflict escalates this year over Moldova’s future, advocates of European democracy and stability might strengthen both by supporting dialogue to reduce conflict between Moldova’s historically Russia-linked church and its smaller rival, subordinate to the Orthodox hierarchy in neighboring Romania.

Type: Analysis

Religion

View All Publications