With the diplomatic peace process between Israelis and Palestinians at a standstill and religiously motivated attacks on the rise, a delegation of senior religious leaders from the Council of Religious Institutions of the Holy Land (CRIHL) gathered at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) on February 28 in a public demonstration of their intention to continue efforts to foster interfaith peace.

With the diplomatic peace process between Israelis and Palestinians at a standstill and religiously motivated attacks on the rise, a delegation of senior religious leaders from the Council of Religious Institutions of the Holy Land (CRIHL) gathered at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) on February 28 in a public demonstration of their intention to continue efforts to foster interfaith peace.

“The very existence of this Council is remarkable,” noted David Smock, the senior vice president of the Religion and Peacemaking Center at USIP.

With its financial and moral support, the Institute was an early backer of interfaith dialogue that produced what is known as the Alexandria Declaration, a pledge by religious leaders from the Holy Land to work together to end violence and promote peace that was signed in Alexandria, Egypt, in 2002. CRIHL is the successor body to the Alexandria Declaration and the subsequent Alexandria Process

Canon Trond Bakkevig, CRIHL’s convener and a pastor of the Church of Norway, said, “We are promoting peace and a culture of peace…and aid all those who work for peace in the Holy Land.” Arguing that it is important to “say it again and again” that peace remains possible, Bakkevig said of CRIHL: “We have managed to stay together to keep the dialogue going thoughout all of this.”

Several members of the CRIHL delegation spoke at the USIP event:

Mahmoud Habbash. Peace “has to be based on a clear principle of justice, comprehensively, and everybody should get their rights,” said Habbash, the Palestinian minister of Waqf and religious affairs. He said that “no one can accept that peace can be achieved” if only one side of the conflict enjoys freedom, dignity, rights and privileges. And neither side, he added, can “build your life at the expense of others.” Habbash argued that even though “Israel was established at the expense of these [Palestinian] people,” both sides “have to move forward.” Said Habbash, “We have to give up concessions--a little bit--but don’t ask me to give up everything.” A peace settlement that called for restoring the borders of Palestine as they existed in 1967—an area far smaller than pre-Israel Palestine--would be “a very dear and painful price to pay” but one that Palestinians are prepared to accept, he said.

Yona Metzger. The Ashkenazi chief rabbi since 2003, Metzger said he believes there is a desire for peace among Palestinians. “I believe in peace,” he said. But the parties to the conflict must recognize that “peace is not only land. Peace is trust between people.” He condemned attacks on holy sites and places of worship, noting that he had visited a burned mosque in the Israeli city of Haifa and that such attacks are the “antithesis” of Jewish teaching. Metzger described himself as a “devotee” of personal, interfaith meetings, and he said his “hope and dream” is “the establishment of the United Nations for religion.”

Fouad Twal. Twal, the Latin patriarch of the Holy Land and Jordan, said that “as religious leaders, we can have influence on our faithful…to encourage the culture of peace.” He added, “We can prepare a new generation that can accept the other, dialogue [with] the other.” In the Holy Land, he said, “we cannot have peace for one people and not the other….I think we are condemned to live together.” All three of the Abrahamic faiths represented in the CRIHL delegation—Judaism, Christianity and Islam--teach that one should love God, one’s neighbors and even one’s enemies, Twal said. “Otherwise, we go on this cycle, this cycle of violence.”


Related Publications

Mona Yacoubian on the Middle East’s Dangerous Escalation Dynamic

Mona Yacoubian on the Middle East’s Dangerous Escalation Dynamic

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

Amid the latest exchange of strikes between Israel and Iran, the Middle East is “a region that really is on fire,” says USIP’s Mona Yacoubian. “There are no guardrails anymore … all of these different players are testing and probing each other to see what they can get away with. And that’s where the danger lies.”

Type: Podcast

What’s Next for Israel, Iran and Prospects for a Wider Middle East War?

What’s Next for Israel, Iran and Prospects for a Wider Middle East War?

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

Early Saturday morning in Tehran, Israel carried out what it called a series of “precise and targeted” airstrikes on Iranian military targets. This was the latest in a series of direct exchanges between Isarel and Iran in recent months. Israel Defense Forces struck 20 sites, including air defense batteries and radar, factories for missile and drone production, and weapons and aircraft launch sites. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that the attack had "severely damaged Iran’s defense capability and its ability to produce missiles.” The Iranian government announced the deaths of four military personnel and one civilian, but otherwise took a more measured response than might be expected.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

A Year After October 7, the Middle East Crisis Has No End in Sight

A Year After October 7, the Middle East Crisis Has No End in Sight

Thursday, October 10, 2024

The grim anniversary of Hamas’ October 7 attacks on Israel and the ensuing war brought little respite for memorialization and healing from the enormity of loss with which Israeli and Palestinian societies have been grappling. More than 100 of the over 250 Israeli and foreign hostages abducted that day into Gaza are estimated to remain in captivity, with only 64 presumed still alive; upward of 42,000 Gazans have been killed in the ongoing war, most of the enclave’s population has been repeatedly displaced, and damage and humanitarian devastation is widespread. A multi-front war that has simmered since that day is now poised to boil over with catastrophic potential for the region.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The Middle East on Fire

The Middle East on Fire

Thursday, October 3, 2024

Iran’s ballistic missile strikes on Israel on October 1 have raised fears of an all-out war in the Middle East. The deepening spiral of bloodshed began on September 17 and 18 with the detonation across Lebanon of thousands of pagers and two-way radios used by Hezbollah operatives — one analyst deemed the unprecedented Israeli operation “the most extensive physical supply chain attack in history.” Ongoing airstrikes in Beirut and southern Lebanon have marked the most significant Israeli barrage in 11 months of tit-for-tat escalation. On September 27, Israel dealt Hezbollah a devastating blow by killing its leader Hassan Nasrallah in an airstrike on a Beirut suburb. Despite reeling from these latest reverses and the evisceration of its command structure, the Shiite militia continues to lob missiles at Israel. Stunned and outraged, Iran — Hezbollah’s patron — fired around 200 ballistic missiles at Israel; at least one person was killed in the West Bank. Iranians are now bracing for Israeli retaliation. The cycle of violence, it appears, is far from over.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications