With the diplomatic peace process between Israelis and Palestinians at a standstill and religiously motivated attacks on the rise, a delegation of senior religious leaders from the Council of Religious Institutions of the Holy Land (CRIHL) gathered at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) on February 28 in a public demonstration of their intention to continue efforts to foster interfaith peace.

With the diplomatic peace process between Israelis and Palestinians at a standstill and religiously motivated attacks on the rise, a delegation of senior religious leaders from the Council of Religious Institutions of the Holy Land (CRIHL) gathered at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) on February 28 in a public demonstration of their intention to continue efforts to foster interfaith peace.

“The very existence of this Council is remarkable,” noted David Smock, the senior vice president of the Religion and Peacemaking Center at USIP.

With its financial and moral support, the Institute was an early backer of interfaith dialogue that produced what is known as the Alexandria Declaration, a pledge by religious leaders from the Holy Land to work together to end violence and promote peace that was signed in Alexandria, Egypt, in 2002. CRIHL is the successor body to the Alexandria Declaration and the subsequent Alexandria Process

Canon Trond Bakkevig, CRIHL’s convener and a pastor of the Church of Norway, said, “We are promoting peace and a culture of peace…and aid all those who work for peace in the Holy Land.” Arguing that it is important to “say it again and again” that peace remains possible, Bakkevig said of CRIHL: “We have managed to stay together to keep the dialogue going thoughout all of this.”

Several members of the CRIHL delegation spoke at the USIP event:

Mahmoud Habbash. Peace “has to be based on a clear principle of justice, comprehensively, and everybody should get their rights,” said Habbash, the Palestinian minister of Waqf and religious affairs. He said that “no one can accept that peace can be achieved” if only one side of the conflict enjoys freedom, dignity, rights and privileges. And neither side, he added, can “build your life at the expense of others.” Habbash argued that even though “Israel was established at the expense of these [Palestinian] people,” both sides “have to move forward.” Said Habbash, “We have to give up concessions--a little bit--but don’t ask me to give up everything.” A peace settlement that called for restoring the borders of Palestine as they existed in 1967—an area far smaller than pre-Israel Palestine--would be “a very dear and painful price to pay” but one that Palestinians are prepared to accept, he said.

Yona Metzger. The Ashkenazi chief rabbi since 2003, Metzger said he believes there is a desire for peace among Palestinians. “I believe in peace,” he said. But the parties to the conflict must recognize that “peace is not only land. Peace is trust between people.” He condemned attacks on holy sites and places of worship, noting that he had visited a burned mosque in the Israeli city of Haifa and that such attacks are the “antithesis” of Jewish teaching. Metzger described himself as a “devotee” of personal, interfaith meetings, and he said his “hope and dream” is “the establishment of the United Nations for religion.”

Fouad Twal. Twal, the Latin patriarch of the Holy Land and Jordan, said that “as religious leaders, we can have influence on our faithful…to encourage the culture of peace.” He added, “We can prepare a new generation that can accept the other, dialogue [with] the other.” In the Holy Land, he said, “we cannot have peace for one people and not the other….I think we are condemned to live together.” All three of the Abrahamic faiths represented in the CRIHL delegation—Judaism, Christianity and Islam--teach that one should love God, one’s neighbors and even one’s enemies, Twal said. “Otherwise, we go on this cycle, this cycle of violence.”


Related Research & Analysis

With Cease-fire Holding, Can Israel and Iran Move Toward De-escalation?

With Cease-fire Holding, Can Israel and Iran Move Toward De-escalation?

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Israel’s stunning and sophisticated June 13 attack on Iran set off a worrying 12-day escalatory spiral. Iran responded in short order with ballistic missile and drone strikes, which led to a series of tit-for-tat exchanges between the two sides. A cease-fire is now in place -- but will it hold?

Type: Analysis

Jordan’s King Walks a Diplomatic Tightrope in Washington

Jordan’s King Walks a Diplomatic Tightrope in Washington

Wednesday, February 12, 2025

Jordan has long been one of the United States closest allies in the Middle East and its leader, King Abdullah II, is typically the first Arab leader to meet with a new U.S. president. But when Abdullah met with President Donald Trump on Tuesday, the two leaders had to navigate profound differences over what happens next in Gaza amid a fragile cease-fire. Trump’s proposal to relocate Gazans to Egypt and Jordan has been met with sharp rejection by both countries and the broader region. The president has suggested that he may withhold aid to Egypt and Jordan if they don’t agree to take Palestinians from Gaza.

Type: Question and Answer

The Current Situation: Israel, The Palestinian Territories, Egypt and the Levant

The Current Situation: Israel, The Palestinian Territories, Egypt and the Levant

Monday, February 10, 2025

For over seven decades, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — and its broader regional reverberations — has shaped Middle East politics and impacted U.S. interests in the region. Hamas’ unprecedented terror attack on October 7, 2023, the Israeli military response in Gaza and the implications for neighboring Jordan and Egypt — as well as seismic ripples in Lebanon and Syria — have sparked a new phase in the conflict’s and the region’s trajectory.

Type: Fact Sheet

Netanyahu Comes to U.S. Amid Potential Inflection Point in the Middle East

Netanyahu Comes to U.S. Amid Potential Inflection Point in the Middle East

Tuesday, February 4, 2025

On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu becomes the first foreign leader to meet with President Donald Trump since his return to the White House. The visit comes as a fragile but holding cease-fire in Gaza approaches the midway point of its initial six-week phase, and as phase two of the agreement’s prescribed negotiations begin, with critical questions surrounding Gaza’s transitional security and governance to be decided. It also comes against a backdrop of a recently extended cease-fire deal between Israel and Hezbollah, expressed interest by both Trump and Netanyahu in advancing Israeli-Saudi normalization, and international concern over Iran’s nuclear threshold, despite the setbacks dealt to the “Axis of Resistance.”

Type: Question and Answer

View All Research & Analysis