The new role of social media in popular revolutions and other political change is not the inevitable force for good some commentators portray it as, but its complicated effects are promoting a wider transfer of geopolitical power from traditional nation-states to individuals and institutions, according to speakers at a conference held at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) on September 16.

September 22, 2011

The new role of social media in popular revolutions and other political change is not the inevitable force for good some commentators portray it as, but its complicated effects are promoting a wider transfer of geopolitical power from traditional nation-states to individuals and institutions, according to speakers at a conference held at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) on September 16.

The rapid rise of new media and information networks, said Alec Ross, the senior adviser for innovation in the office of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, is helping to drive a “devolution of power from large nation-states to individuals and smaller institutions.” Ross called the use of social media during the upheavals of the Arab Spring “a very powerful manifestation” of the shift. “This [power shift] is what I think is presenting the greatest challenge to governments the world over,” he said.

Ross spoke at a conference titled “Sifting Fact from Fiction: The Role of Social Media in Conflict.” Co-hosted with George Washington University (GWU), the multi-panel meeting was part of USIP’s Blogs and Bullets Initiative, an effort to encourage data collection and analysis that can yield a more accurate, fact-based understanding of how the new media are changing politics and conflict.

“We want to make sure policymakers who have responsibilities for issues of war and peace are benefitting from the new insights being generated by the research in this fast-moving field,” said Sheldon Himelfarb, director of USIP’s Center of Innovation Science, Technology and Peacebuilding. “Everyone agrees that social media played a powerful role in the events in the Middle East and North Africa of the last several months, but whether we can harness that power to proactively build a better, more peaceful region going forward remains to be seen.”

Several commentators at the conference cautioned against exuberant pronouncements that social media—widely used to organize and rally anti-government protests in Egypt, Tunisia and elsewhere in the Arab Spring movements—are the new key to toppling dictators and ushering in democracy, freedom and peace. “We should not think of social media as the finger starting the dominoes to fall,” said John Sides, a political scientist at GWU. “They are a tool, and they can be used for good and for ill.”

Added Marc Lynch, a GWU political scientist and international affairs specialist who blogs about the Middle East for ForeignPolicy.com, “This is not going to necessarily lead to democracy….Islamists use social media as well as anyone else, maybe better.” For political movements, protesters and governments alike, Lynch calls the social media “an arena within which to compete” over shaping popular attitudes and the narratives around which those vying for influence, including governments, portray their actions and aims.

Indeed, repressive governments also use social media, with some monitoring Facebook accounts to identify and then arrest activists, as Deen Freelon, a specialist in mapping and analyzing online content and behavior with American University, said. Unlike some of the other governments facing rebellion, Bahrain, according to Andy Carvin, who leads National Public Radio’s social media strategy and serves as its primary voice on Twitter and Facebook, was very effective at using social media to blunt the influence of online protesters.

Ross of the State Department said the explosion of political activism on social media was bringing on “the reaction of entrenched central authorities” intent on not losing power. He cited earlier actions by the governments of Tunisia, Egypt, Syria and Libya to shut down or hack into mobile or other networks. “It’s going to produce more and more of a body count,” he said. Ross suggested that the social media could also have the effect of further fragmenting and adding complexity to polarized societies. He called himself “pessimistic generally” about their utility in preventing conflict and finding peaceful outcomes. His suspicion, as he told the USIP gathering, is, “These tools are better at exercising dissent than forging compromise.”

That said, Clay Shirky of New York University’s Interactive Telecommunications Program, credited the use of social media with achieving a “background strengthening of the public sphere.” Arab Spring protesters, he noted, have been able to use the new technology to disseminate the place and time for protests without the involvement of mainstream media. In Egypt, social media were used to warn away people from locations where pro-regime thugs were beating up protesters, said Sultan al-Qassemi, a fellow at the Dubai School of Government.

Social media in the hands of activists also allowed ordinary people to document and disseminate evidence of government violence and other human rights abuses, speakers said. Lynch of GWU said that capability was “creating a norm against impunity.” He added, “This seems to me like a watershed….This really does fundamentally change what governments can do to their people.”

Having the new media capabilities in the hands of citizens, argued Ross, renders old-style government propaganda “largely toothless in the digital age.” As for the U.S. government, the new media capabilities will significantly change the conduct of diplomacy, he said. U.S. diplomats now need to be attentive to newly empowered publics. Ambassadors, many of whom are unused to the new forms of communication, are receiving training aimed at “trying to get them to work with networked citizenry,” Ross said, adding, “You don’t just meet with ministers and CEOs.”

“We’re trying to figure out how to engage with a new set of interlocutors,” Ross said. More broadly, the new media affords a “marvelous opportunity to connect” the governed with those doing the governing, he said.

Explore Further


Related Publications

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Five Factors Shaping the Future of Egypt-Israel Relations

Thursday, June 13, 2024

The Gaza war has strained Egyptian-Israeli relations to an unprecedented level and raised questions about the future of their 1979 peace treaty that has been a cornerstone of Arab-Israeli peace. U.S. officials met recently in Cairo with their Israeli and Egyptian counterparts against a backdrop of mutually diminishing confidence between the two parties, particularly following Israel’s ground offensive in Rafah. This comes on the heels of a shooting incident between Israeli and Egyptian forces that left at least one Egyptian soldier dead, and Egypt joining South Africa’s case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Along with Qatar, Egypt is a key broker in the current Israel-Hamas cease-fire efforts and engages in extensive security cooperation with the U.S. and Israel.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Is China Eyeing a Second Military Base in Africa?

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

For over three decades, every Chinese foreign minister’s first overseas trip of the year has been to Africa. This year continued the tradition with China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, visiting Egypt, Tunisia, Togo and Côte d'Ivoire. Notably, every one of these countries is coastal. And yet, at a time of continued speculation over China’s next military installation in Africa, none of these countries has featured prominently as potential locations in previous analyses. We might, therefore, reasonably ask what China’s current considerations are around basing in Africa. Faced with an increasingly multipolar and assertive Africa at a time of domestic economic challenge, however, China’s long-term strategy remains unclear.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Thursday, January 18, 2024

Since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, Egypt has been heavily involved in efforts to end the military confrontations and wars that have periodically broken out in Gaza. However, the scope, scale and stakes of the current war is unlike any prior round of hostilities. In response to the massacre and hostage-taking of mostly Israeli civilians by Hamas and other militant armed groups during their devastating attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel has launched one of the most destructive wars in its history. Indeed, this war will be transformational in numerous ways, with ramifications for several stakeholders beyond the parties themselves.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

Thursday, August 3, 2023

Amid today’s dismal Israeli-Palestinian context, positive developments have been in short supply. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s June announcement of preliminary approval for the development of the Gaza Marine gas fields provided a rare glimpse of a potential win-win opportunity. For the Palestinians, it could provide a much-needed boost to their lagging economy and the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority (PA). On the Israeli side, it allows the Netanyahu government to claim it is assisting in improving living conditions in Gaza and could lead to less U.S. pressure on issues like settlement expansion. In the big picture, this is another example of how energy is increasingly becoming a focus for potential win-win agreements in the East Mediterranean.

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications