This follow-up course to USIP's Security Sector Governance and Reform course is geared towards peacebuilding practitioners who are actively working to design and implement an SSG/R project. The course provides a framework and considerations for assessing, designing, implementing, and measuring outcomes of SSG/R projects.

A police officer stands guard at the socio-economic reintegration zone in La Variante for former FARC members and their families. Tumaco, Nariño, Colombia. September 19, 2019 (Photo: USIP)
A police officer stands guard at the socio-economic reintegration zone in La Variante for former FARC members and their families. Tumaco, Nariño, Colombia. September 19, 2019 (Photo: USIP)

Learning Objectives

By the end of this course, participants will be able to:

  • Explain the goals, challenges, types, and steps of SSG assessment.
  • Differentiate between types of implementation approaches.
  • Describe the purpose of M&E for SSG/R programs and its challenges.
  • Explain key concepts of M&E, including theory of change, indicators, and different evaluation methods.
  • Recognize the importance of integrating evaluation findings into programming.

Agenda:

Chapter 1 - Assessment

The first chapter of this course explores the complexity of SSG/R from a peacebuilding perspective. It begins by defining key terminology, including security sector actors, security sector governance, and security sector reform.

Chapter 2 - Design and Strategic Planning

This chapter introduces structural drivers and triggers of election violence, and commonly used analytical frameworks.

Chapter 3 - Measuring Outcomes

This chapter identifies upstream or early prevention approaches.

Chapter 4 - Conclusion

In the final chapter, you will be asked to reflect on what you have learned in the course, provide feedback, and complete a final exam to earn your certificate.

Related Publications

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Monday, February 19, 2024

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its four partner countries in the Indo-Pacific—Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), and New Zealand—have entered a period of increased engagement. This engagement is taking shape in the context of the war waged by the Russian Federation (Russia) against Ukraine, NATO’s growing awareness of the security challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China (China), and important structural changes in the international system, including the return of strategic competition between the United States and China and Russia. It is occurring not only in bilateral NATO-partner relations but also between NATO and these Indo-Pacific countries as a group.

Type: Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionCivilian-Military RelationsGlobal PolicyMediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Senior Study Group for the Sahel: Final Report and Recommendations

Senior Study Group for the Sahel: Final Report and Recommendations

Thursday, January 18, 2024

The United States has not traditionally viewed the Sahel as a region of vital interest, whether in terms of security or from an economic or business perspective. This has led to a pattern of reactive involvement shaped by the circumstances of specific events rather than proactive commitments. This pattern reveals the lack of a comprehensive strategy for the volatile Western Sahel region, which includes Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, and Niger. In April 2022, President Joe Biden announced that the US government would advance the “U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability” in coastal West Africa by prioritizing a partnership with Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, and Togo.

Type: Report

Civilian-Military RelationsDemocracy & GovernancePeace ProcessesViolent Extremism

On Veterans Day and Every Day, U.S. Veterans Are Peacebuilders

On Veterans Day and Every Day, U.S. Veterans Are Peacebuilders

Thursday, November 9, 2023

The Veterans Day that Americans observe this week is rooted in hopes for peace that burst in 1918 from a train parked in a French forest: Allied and German military officers had signed a halt to humanity’s deadliest war ever. One hundred five years later, warfare in Ukraine, Israel-Gaza and dozens of countries have heightened both bloodshed and Americans’ concerns about whether humankind can fulfill our hopes for a world governed through laws rather than armed might. Still, the building of peace continues, even amid violence — and its builders include those who know best the horror of wars for having fought them.

Type: Blog

Civilian-Military Relations

View All Publications