Despite trillions of dollars invested in the Afghanistan war and reconstruction effort, the U.S. government failed to achieve an inclusive and durable political settlement to the conflict. Why were negotiations among the three main parties to the conflict — the United States, the Taliban and the Afghan government — ultimately unsuccessful? Why did the United States not prioritize a peace process until it was too late?

On October 25, USIP hosted a conference that brought together former senior officials and top experts to explore these critical questions and identify lessons to inform U.S. policy in the future. The conference featured two public panels that looked at why no meaningful intra-Afghan peace talks took place from 2001 to 2021, as well as the missed opportunities and missteps that derailed efforts to reach a political settlement to the conflict.

Drawing on U.S., Afghan, regional, civilian and military perspectives, these discussions explored how the various parties viewed their interests, incentives and leverage over time, and what key assumptions constrained these actors. The conference probed the extent to which the United States had a political strategy to guide its military strategy, the various parties’ goals and strategy during talks in Doha, and why Afghan government leaders failed to achieve a unified position in negotiations when the Afghan Republic had the most to lose from a failed peace process. 

Given the enormous costs of the failure to achieve a political settlement and the dire conditions in Taliban-run Afghanistan today, the goal of these conversations was not only to advance our collective understanding of why the peace process failed but to inform future U.S. policy in Afghanistan and other conflict-affected countries.

Continue the conversation on Twitter using #AfghanistanUSIP.

Speakers

Learning from Missed Opportunities and Mistakes by the U.S. Government

  • Christopher Kolenda
    Retired U.S. Army Colonel; Adjunct Senior Fellow, Center for a New American Security
  • Dipali Mukhopadhyay
    Associate Professor, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota; Senior Expert, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Tamanna Salikuddin
    Director, South Asia Programs, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Kate Bateman, moderator
    Senior Expert, Afghanistan, U.S. Institute of Peace

Afghan, Regional and International Perspectives on the Failed Peace Process

  • Masoom Stanekzai
    Former Chief Negotiator, Intelligence Chief, and Defense Minister, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan 
  • Habiba Sarabi
    Former Negotiator, Provincial Governor, and Minister of Women’s Affairs, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan 
  • Steve J. Brooking
    Former Special Advisor on Peace and Reconciliation, U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan
  • Kristian Berg Harpviken
    Research Professor, Peace Research Institute Oslo
  • Scott Worden, moderator
    Director, Afghanistan and Central Asia, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications