On October 26, 2009, USIP held a panel discussion with Amb. Linton Brooks, Joseph Cirincione, and Thomas Scheber on next steps for the START process and the START Follow-on Treaty.

In its final report the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States urged that the United States, "[make] the first step on U.S.-Russian arms control modest and straight-forward in order to rejuvenate the process and ensure that there is a successor to the START I agreement before it expires at the end of 2009.  The United States and Russia should not over-reach for innovative approaches."

In July, Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitri Medvedev signed a Joint Understanding for the START Follow-on Treaty, which "commits the United States and Russia to reduce their strategic warheads to a range of 1,500-1,675, and their strategic delivery vehicles to a range of 500-1,000."  This is a reduction from the limits set by the 2002 Moscow Treaty, which mandates that each party have no more than 2,200 strategic warheads operationally deployed by 2012.

The Joint Understanding was an important preliminary step in a series of ongoing negotiations aimed at establishing a successor to START I, which is set to expire on December 5, 2009.  The Joint Understanding has raised concerns in some quarters about the directions the START process is taking. Some are calling for still deeper reductions in the number of strategic warheads, while others warn against making any cuts at all before the release of the Pentagon's upcoming Nuclear Posture Review. Other issues affecting the START process include missile defense, strategic modernization, numbers of delivery vehicles, and many more. Beyond these issues, the United States and Russia face the challenge of either reaching an agreement before START I expires in December, extending START I while continuing to negotiate a START Follow-on, or allowing START I to lapse.

On October 26, 2009, USIP held a panel discussion with Amb. Linton Brooks, Joseph Cirincione, and Thomas Scheber on next steps for the START process and the START Follow-on Treaty.

Speakers

  • Ambassador Linton F. Brooks
    Former Undersecretary of Energy for National Security/Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
    Former Chief Strategic Arms Reductions (START) Negotiator
  • Joseph Cirincione
    President, Ploughshares Fund
  • Thomas Scheber
    Vice President, National Institute for Public Policy
  • Paul D. Hughes, Moderator
    Senior Program Officer, U.S. Institute of Peace
    Executive Director, Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States

Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications