This is event discussed the linkages between corruption and conflict affected states, the panel presented strategies to address corruption that are conflict-sensitive and peacebuilding.

According to Transparency International’s 2010 Corruption Perceptions Index, countries experiencing or emerging from conflict are among the most corrupt.  The bottom-ranked countries in the survey are Somalia, Burma/Myanmar, Afghanistan and Iraq.  This is partly because of the pervasive effects of the conflict economy and partly because of the breakdown of governing institutions, which leads to impunity.  The resultant corruption frustrates efforts at post-conflict reconstruction, undermines the development of effective governance structures and imposes huge costs on all citizens --- particularly the most vulnerable.  It is clear that unless corruption is fully understood, addressed and drastically reduced both national resources and foreign assistance flows will fail to promote peace, and the worsening inter-group tensions could eventually re-ignite violent conflict. 

Sharing experiences from Afghanistan and Iraq, the panelists will consider the following questions:  Is endemic corruption inevitable in conflict-affected states?  How are corruption and violent conflict linked?  What strategies have worked, or are likely to work, in conflict-affected states?  How do we measure progress with anti-corruption initiatives?

Speakers

  • Frank Gunter
    Associate Professor, Economics at Lehigh University and former Economic Advisor to the US-led multi-national forces in Iraq
  • Lorenzo Delesgues
    Director, Integrity Watch Afghanistan and co-director of IWA corruption surveys in Afghanistan
  • Michael Dziedzic, Moderator
    Senior Program Officer, Center for Post-Conflict Peace and Stability Operations, US Institute of Peace

Explore Further

Related Publications

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications