We live in an age of immense technological innovation and disruption. While these technologies make our lives easier, criminal groups and terrorist networks have the tools to exploit them, as policymakers struggle to keep up with rapid pace of change. Terrorist groups like the Islamic State and rogue regimes like North Korea employ these technologies to illicitly finance their operations, often using cryptocurrencies in order to evade detection. Despite the partisan rancor in Washington, Republican and Democrat members of Congress are coming together to counter illicit financing and wrestle with these emerging policy challenges.

Rep. Steve Pearce, Nancy Lindborg, Rep. Jim Himes
Pictured from left to right, Rep. Steve Pearce, Nancy Lindborg, Rep. Jim Himes

“Innovation in financial services revolutionizes and simplifies our lives. However, bad actors around the globe exploit the global financial system and modernized technologies for criminal gain. From social media to cryptocurrencies, hackers can break into networks and steal sensitive information for their own capital advantage,” said Congressman Steve Pearce (R-NM), the chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Terrorism and Illicit Finance.

Rep. Pearce and Congressman Jim Himes (D-CT) discussed their work on the Subcommittee as part of the U.S. Institute of Peace’s Bipartisan Congressional Dialogue—a series of discussions to explore U.S. legislators’ common ground on foreign policy problems and to advance solutions.

No Room for Partisanship Amid an Ever-Changing Problem

For lawmakers in Washington, the fast pace of change in the cyber arena requires constant vigilance and there is agreement that this issue supersedes partisan concerns, as all Americans utilize these technologies and are vulnerable to exploitation. “There’s a lot of work to be done and opening the dialogue like we have done today is definitely a step in the right direction,” Himes said. “There is no room for partisanship on this issue,” added Pearce.

There is a critical need for political leaders to be educated on cybersecurity and to ensure that regulatory agencies are facing the challenges of the 21st century. Cyberthreats move much quicker than lawmakers and regulating agencies can. Indeed, cyberattacks occur around the world every day and hacking financial systems is still a low-risk, high-reward method of illicit financing.

“Representatives Pearce and Himes are leading Congress in combatting the illicit funding of terrorism that perpetuates violent conflict and undermines American interests. They are leaders on the frontier of technology and national security issues where bipartisanship is essential,” noted USIP President Nancy Lindborg.

The 2018 National Security Strategy recognizes the urgency of this issue, and says the United States will “use sophisticated investigative tools to disrupt the ability of criminals to use online marketplaces, cryptocurrencies, and other tools for illicit activities.”

Nation States Must Step Up

It’s not just groups like the Islamic State or hacker collectives that illicitly finance their operations by exploiting vulnerable technologies. States like Russia and Iran also look to illicit financing to skirt sanctions and manipulate the international financial system. “All of these problems get a lot easier if nation states act responsibly,” Himes said.

Ultimately, no country wants to see its electrical grid or water system hacked or tampered with and this should lead to common ground in the international community. “We need to focus on creating the cyber equivalent of the Geneva Conventions,” Himes asserted.

Cryptocurrencies present their own problems, as they help criminals evade taxation and are difficult to track and monitor. “Technologies such as cryptocurrencies offer anonymity and are borderless, making them targets for exploitation by malicious actors for illicit activities ranging from terrorist financing, money laundering and evasion of sanctions,” Himes said.

While issues surrounding cybersecurity and threats are often borderless, the nation state remains the organizing principle of the international order. Cooperation among the international community, therefore, is the most effective and comprehensive way to address illicit financing and other cyberthreats.

What Can be Done?

Both congressmen said the United States must maintain its role as the leader of a functioning international system and work closely with allies to develop solutions. The United States is still not at the cutting edge of cybersecurity compared to other countries, said Pearce, and must work with countries, like Israel and Australia, that have advanced experience in addressing cyberthreats.

Importantly, a set of norms must be agreed upon and codified, particularly when it comes to issues with little room for disagreement—all states, for example, can agree that they do not want their hospitals to be hacked. “We should take care of the easy things first,” Pearce said, coming to international agreements on points of convergence.

The United States can also arm the financial centers of the world to regulate what is immediately possible. “The U.S. should be a leader in developing resilient and proactive cybersecurity strategies,” Pearce said.

USIP’s Bipartisan Congressional Dialogue will continue to bring together leaders from both political parties to address urgent national security and foreign policy challenges.  


Related Publications

A Delicate Balance: Promoting Nuclear Energy While Preventing Proliferation

A Delicate Balance: Promoting Nuclear Energy While Preventing Proliferation

Thursday, November 21, 2024

As global energy demands intensify and the urgency of addressing climate shocks mounts, the role of nuclear energy has come to the forefront of discussions for governments, businesses and those concerned about sustainable development. Just last week, the Biden administration released a plan to triple U.S. nuclear capacity by 2050. While nuclear energy promises efficiency gains and significant emissions reductions, public opinion remains divided about the tradeoffs of increased investment, the safety risks and the implications for international security. This puts the U.S. at a crossroads as it tries to navigate its role in a world with new demands for nuclear energy and heightened risks of conflict between nuclear-armed states. Such risks were highlighted this week when Russia lowered its nuclear threshold in response to new U.S. authorizations for Ukraine to use long-range weapons.

Type: Analysis

EnvironmentGlobal Policy

Why Early Warnings Are Critical for Climate Action and Conflict Prevention

Why Early Warnings Are Critical for Climate Action and Conflict Prevention

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Amid a changing climate, understanding the interplay between extreme environmental events and conflict is only growing more important. Droughts, floods and other natural disasters can exacerbate socioeconomic vulnerabilities, highlight weaknesses in governance, disrupt livelihoods and increase perceptions of marginalization.

Type: Analysis

EnvironmentViolent Extremism

Back to the Future? Kazakhstan’s Nuclear Choice

Back to the Future? Kazakhstan’s Nuclear Choice

Thursday, October 17, 2024

Although Kazakhstan denuclearized over three decades ago when it split from the Soviet Union, the Central Asian nation held a referendum on October 6 over whether it should build a nuclear power plant. With 73% voting yes, the referendum could reverberate beyond Kazakhstan and the Central Asia region. Safe nuclear power would be a boon for Kazakhstan, decreasing its reliance on fossil fuels while increasing economic resilience and helping it to address its immense climate change challenges. There are also important U.S. interests at stake here. The U.S. and Western allies should constructively engage with Kazakhstan, including helping to build a new reactor, to avoid Russian or Chinese control of Kazakhstan’s new nuclear energy sector and its valuable uranium resources.

Type: Analysis

EnvironmentGlobal Policy

How U.S. Leadership Can Elevate the Food-Climate-Security Nexus

How U.S. Leadership Can Elevate the Food-Climate-Security Nexus

Wednesday, October 16, 2024

Today, environmental, economic and political shocks have pushed more than 250 million people into food insecurity. Climate change, extreme weather events, conflict, and supply and distribution issues are impacting what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) considers the four pillars of food security: availability, access, utilization and stability. Food insecurity can lead to social unrest, economic instability and political challenges — impacting individual countries and broader regions. Unpredictability and disruptions in food systems can open the door for food to be wielded as a weapon or source of influence by state and non-state actors. Along with the worrying human toll, these dynamics have important implications for U.S. and global security, which means that increasing the ability of global food systems to withstand these acute and slow-onset shocks is a U.S. security imperative.

Type: Analysis

Environment

View All Publications


Related Projects

Bipartisan Congressional Dialogues

Bipartisan Congressional Dialogues

Bipartisan Congressional Dialogues have tackled such pressing national security topics as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, China’s growing international impact, strategies to prevent violent conflict through stabilization and deterrence, protecting human rights, and advancing international religious freedom around the globe.

View All