This online course introduces how election violence is a threat to peace and democracy. The course provides participants with knowledge and skills to prevent violence more effectively across different electoral and conflict environments. The course identifies risks and opportunities for prevention through the various phases of the election cycle--before, during and after election day–as well as the underutilized time between elections. The course also introduces different types of election violence prevention and reviews their utility.

A man votes in an election in Colombia. Photo: Tonis Montes, USIP
A man votes in an election in Mexico. Photo: Tonis Montes, USIP

Elections can create anxiety and tension in many transitioning democracies around the world. In some cases, elections even turn violent, presenting a big setback not only to peace, but to democracy as well. For the past 20 years, USIP has tried to better understand why this happens and how election violence can be mitigated and prevented. While most organizations in the election space do great work in providing technical assistance, by supporting logistical preparations or by making sure that political parties campaign responsibly, USIP takes a different approach.

Course Objectives

By the end of this course, participants in this course will be able to:

  • Grasp the scope of election violence as a challenge to peace and democracy;
  • Identify structural risks and triggers of election violence before, during and after election day;
  • Understand the range and utility of various approaches to promote peaceful elections;
  • Design holistic strategies including the full array of early prevention and crisis management tools aimed at preventing election-related violence; and
  • Recognize the logic and test the effectiveness of international, national and local interventions.

If you cannot view the video, click here to download it.

Registration Information:

“Preventing Election Violence” is an online, self-paced course offered by USIP's Global Campus. The Global Campus has created a private network where courses are available. To begin the course, please register following the link at the top right of this page. You will be taken to the Global Campus landing page where you can “Request to Join” and create a free account. You should receive an email with approval from the Global Campus within 24 hours, including a link to sign in to the network.

Once you are signed in to the Global Campus, the "Courses" tab on the left of the page will take you to the list of available courses, including Preventing Election Violence.

Chapter 1 - Foundations of Election Violence Prevention

This chapter introduces election violence as a peacebuilding challenge, with concrete country examples, and highlights commonly used prevention approaches.

Chapter 2 - Conflict Analysis and Early Warning: Root Causes and Risk Assessment

This chapter introduces structural drivers and triggers of election violence, and commonly used analytical frameworks.

Chapter 3 - Early Prevention

This chapter identifies upstream or early prevention approaches.

Chapter 4 - Violence Mitigation and Crisis Response

This chapter introduces short-term prevention options to mitigate risk or quickly intervene where election violence is imminent or ongoing.

Chapter 5 - Measuring Effectiveness and Evaluating Impact

This chapter discusses the importance of measuring effectiveness and evaluating impact.

Instructors and Guest Experts

Instructors

  • Jonas Claes, Policy Officer, European External Action Service
  • Debra Liang-Fenton, Consultant and former Senior Program Officer, U.S. Institute of Peace

Guest Experts

Related Research & Analysis

Philippines: Former Combatants Help Keep the Peace During Recent Polls

Philippines: Former Combatants Help Keep the Peace During Recent Polls

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

By: Haroro Ingram, Country Director, Philippines, USIP

For decades, the struggle for peace in the Philippines’ southernmost island of Mindanao has been characterized by armed conflict between the Philippines government and Moro separatist groups, like the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), and cycles of failed peace processes. The historic 2014 peace agreement between the Philippines government and MILF led to the granting of greater self-governance with the creation of the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) five years later. What has followed since is an unprecedented, yet very fragile, period of peace and stability.

Type: Analysis

Cómo Puede Contribuir EE.UU. a la Resolución del Conflicto en Venezuela

Cómo Puede Contribuir EE.UU. a la Resolución del Conflicto en Venezuela

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

El reciente anuncio de negociaciones directas entre Venezuela y Estados Unidos fue recibido con agrado por muchos venezolanos como una oportunidad para aumentar las posibilidades de que las elecciones del 28 de julio se desarrollen pacíficamente y conduzcan a un futuro de coexistencia democrática. Sin embargo, la clave de este resultado dependerá menos de las cuestiones tácticas electorales —como los incentivos para no anular la candidatura de la oposición— y más de la cuestión más amplia de asegurar que no habrá persecución del perdedor y que ambas partes puedan volver a la alternancia del poder en lugar de un régimen de partido único. EE.UU. está en una posición clave tanto para influir en el ambiente general de las elecciones como para tomar acciones específicas que faciliten un resultado democrático, que se desarrollará a lo largo de un período post-electoral extendido.

Type: Analysis

How the U.S. Can Contribute to Resolving the Venezuelan Conflict

How the U.S. Can Contribute to Resolving the Venezuelan Conflict

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

The recent announcement of direct negotiations between Venezuela and the United States was welcomed by many Venezuelans as an opportunity to bolster the chances of the July 28 election playing out peacefully and leading to a future of democratic co-existence. The key to this outcome, however, will hinge less on the tactical electoral questions — such as incentives for not annulling the opposition’s electoral ticket — and more on the larger question of ensuring there will be no persecution of the loser and that the two sides can return to the alternation of power rather than single party rule. The U.S. is in key a position to both influence the general ambiance of the election and to take specific actions that will facilitate a democratic outcome, which will play out over an extended post-electoral period.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis