The Afghan people stand at the center of one of the greatest foreign policy challenges facing the U.S. and the world today. Ultimately, their confidence in the Afghan government and the international community, their rejection of extremism, and their investment in their own future will define the potential for long-term stability in Afghanistan. At present, the spread of corruption, criminality, violence, and uncertainty are alienating many Afghans from the Afghan government and its international partners. To reverse this trend, significant work is needed at the local level, addressing citizen concerns and needs province by province, district by district.

The panelists, all with recent service in Afghanistan addressing local governance and development issues, will discuss the efforts of the U.S. and ISAF to expand the presence of the central government, improve security, and promote reconstruction at the local level. The panel will also examine the state of joint civil-military operations, as many local level initiatives, such as those implemented through provincial reconstruction teams (PRTs), require close civilian and military cooperation


Archived Audio

To listen to audio or to view video, please click on the links provided below. You also can right click on the links and choose "Save Target As" or "Download Linked File." This will save the file to your computer and then allow you to play it in your media player directly. More Audio Help.

Speakers

  • Sloan Mann
    Former USAID Development Advisor to the Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force- Afghanistan
  • Major Jay Liddick
    D/97th Civil Affairs Company Commander with multiple tours in Afghanistan
  • Dr. Stacy Crevello
    Former USAID Development Advisor to ISAF
  • Edward Joseph
    Member, USAID assessment team for the Local Governance and Community Development (LGCD) program, Afghanistan
  • J Alexander Thier, Moderator
    U.S. Institute of Peace

 

Related Publications

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

At the end of June, envoys and representatives from more than 25 countries and international organizations gathered in Doha, Qatar, along with representatives from the Taliban under an U.N.-facilitated framework. This meeting was the third of its kind, widely referred to as “Doha 3,” and part of a process to establish a more coordinated and coherent global approach to Afghanistan’s challenges and the Taliban’s rule.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications