There is a growing body of evidence that group dynamics can help explain the nature and likelihood of political violence. This event discussed questions like: What types of horizontal inequalities make political violence most likely?  What factors determine group mobilization?  Is there a tipping point? How should conflict management and peace promotion strategies better account for horizontal inequalities?

Current approaches to peace promotion and conflict resolution focus on human security, with emphasis placed on measurable improvements in the condition and environment of each individual. Poverty reduction efforts also follow this trend, highlighting metrics such as the poverty headcount. While the individual is clearly important, there is a growing body of evidence that group dynamics can help explain the nature and likelihood of political violence. Professor Frances Stewart, Director of the Center for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity at Oxford University, has pioneered work on the policy implications of different types of group differentiation or horizontal inequalities.

Cultural, economic and political identities help determine both well-being and socio-political stability. The nature of differences between groups could reveal the potential for group mobilization and the propensity for violence. Naturally, this implies that conflict management strategies (at all stages of conflict) must take full account of horizontal inequalities. This event will seek to answer questions like: What types of horizontal inequalities make political violence most likely? What factors determine group mobilization? Is there a tipping point? How should conflict management and peace promotion strategies better account for horizontal inequalities?  Professor Stewart led a discussion on the relationship between group identities and political violence and outline recommendations for policy-makers and practitioners.

Speakers

  • Frances Stewart
    Director, Centre for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity, University of Oxford
  • S. Tjip Walker
    Team Leader, Warning and Analysis, Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation, U.S. Agency for International Development
  • Robert Aten
    Team Leader, Economic Policy and Governance, Office of Economic Policy, U.S. Agency for International Development
  • Raymond Gilpin, Moderator
    Director, Center for Sustainable Economies, U.S. Institute of Peace

Explore

 

Related Publications

China’s Dilemmas Deepen as North Korea Enters Ukraine War

China’s Dilemmas Deepen as North Korea Enters Ukraine War

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Until late October, the big questions about China’s role in the Ukraine conflict centered around whether Beijing would choose to expand its support for Russia to include lethal aid, or if it might engage in more active peacemaking to end the conflict. Then, on November 4, the Pentagon confirmed that North Korea sent more than 10,000 troops to Russia’s Kursk oblast, where Ukraine had captured some territory earlier this year. Days later, the State Department confirmed that North Korean soldiers had begun fighting Ukrainian troops.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

The Ukraine war is taking a new turn with the involvement of North Korean soldiers. Washington estimates that, so far, North Korea has sent approximately 10,000 troops to Russia — around 8,000 of whom have been deployed to the western region of Kursk, where Ukraine seized territory in a surprise attack earlier this year. And as U.S. officials predicted in late October, North Korean troops have reportedly begun engaging in direct combat.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Russia’s war against Ukraine has spurred closer cooperation between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific states and organizations, particularly Australia and NATO, signaling a deepening of ties that could have long-term benefits for global security. Over the long term, writes security expert Gorana Grgić, such alignment is crucial for signaling to potential aggressors that global coalitions are prepared to respond. This report analyzes Australia’s response in order to examine Canberra’s strategic thinking with respect to cross-theater cooperation, and it offers recommendations for US, NATO, and Australian policymakers.

Type: Special Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would be an extremely difficult military, complex operation. China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been thinking seriously since the early 2000s about what such a landing would require. For over two decades, its force development efforts have been focused on the weapons, equipment, doctrine and operational concepts required to conquer the island in the face of full U.S. military intervention. The PLA has made considerable progress toward that goal and may deem itself fully capable by the 2027 force development target set by Xi Jinping.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications