There is a growing body of evidence that group dynamics can help explain the nature and likelihood of political violence. This event discussed questions like: What types of horizontal inequalities make political violence most likely?  What factors determine group mobilization?  Is there a tipping point? How should conflict management and peace promotion strategies better account for horizontal inequalities?

Current approaches to peace promotion and conflict resolution focus on human security, with emphasis placed on measurable improvements in the condition and environment of each individual. Poverty reduction efforts also follow this trend, highlighting metrics such as the poverty headcount. While the individual is clearly important, there is a growing body of evidence that group dynamics can help explain the nature and likelihood of political violence. Professor Frances Stewart, Director of the Center for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity at Oxford University, has pioneered work on the policy implications of different types of group differentiation or horizontal inequalities.

Cultural, economic and political identities help determine both well-being and socio-political stability. The nature of differences between groups could reveal the potential for group mobilization and the propensity for violence. Naturally, this implies that conflict management strategies (at all stages of conflict) must take full account of horizontal inequalities. This event will seek to answer questions like: What types of horizontal inequalities make political violence most likely? What factors determine group mobilization? Is there a tipping point? How should conflict management and peace promotion strategies better account for horizontal inequalities?  Professor Stewart led a discussion on the relationship between group identities and political violence and outline recommendations for policy-makers and practitioners.

Speakers

  • Frances Stewart
    Director, Centre for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity, University of Oxford
  • S. Tjip Walker
    Team Leader, Warning and Analysis, Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation, U.S. Agency for International Development
  • Robert Aten
    Team Leader, Economic Policy and Governance, Office of Economic Policy, U.S. Agency for International Development
  • Raymond Gilpin, Moderator
    Director, Center for Sustainable Economies, U.S. Institute of Peace

Explore

 

Related Publications

As Myanmar’s Junta Loses Control in the North, China’s Influence Grows

As Myanmar’s Junta Loses Control in the North, China’s Influence Grows

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Earlier this year, China brokered talks between Myanmar’s military and an alliance of ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) that handed the army its worst defeat in history. The negotiations’ goal was to restore overland trade — interrupted by fighting — between China’s Yunnan Province and Myanmar. To China’s frustration, the talks collapsed in mid-May, and in late June the alliance reopened its anti-junta offensive.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

China, Philippines Have Big Disagreements Over Their Recent Deal

China, Philippines Have Big Disagreements Over Their Recent Deal

Thursday, July 25, 2024

China and the Philippines this weekend reached a deal aimed at reducing their growing tensions over Second Thomas Shoal. The agreement comes as maritime confrontations have been increasing in frequency and intensity, raising fears of a broader conflict that could lead to the Philippines invoking its mutual defense treaty with the United States. While the deal could be a key step to reducing tensions, messaging from both Beijing and Manila suggests that both sides still firmly maintain their positions on the disputed waters, and that they see the agreement’s provisions in fundamentally different ways.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

What the Houthi-Israel Exchange Might Mean for Escalation in the Middle East

What the Houthi-Israel Exchange Might Mean for Escalation in the Middle East

Wednesday, July 24, 2024

The Middle East saw yet another escalatory episode over the weekend, as Israel and Yemen’s Houthis exchanged fire. On July 19, the Iran-backed Houthis launched an unprecedented drone attack on Israel, which hit an apartment building in downtown Tel Aviv, killing one and injuring at least 10 others. It was the first time that the Houthis killed or even harmed an Israeli, despite launching dozens of missile attacks on Israel since October 7. The next day, Israel struck back with an airstrike on the strategic port of Hodeida, marking the first time it attacked Yemen. The Israeli attack killed six, injured dozens more and left ablaze key oil facilities in the area.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The Red Sea Crisis Goes Beyond the Houthis

The Red Sea Crisis Goes Beyond the Houthis

Friday, July 19, 2024

The Red Sea is in crisis. At the center of the storm are Yemen’s Houthi rebels, who have unleashed a wave of attacks on ships traversing one of the world’s most pivotal maritime straits, putatively in support of Hamas’s war against Israel. The Houthi gambit in the Red Sea is imposing serious costs on global trade, as did the problem of Somali piracy, which reached its peak in 2010. The United States and some of its allies have stepped in to militarily suppress the threat, bombing Houthi positions inside Yemen. But although this episode is illustrative of the difficulties of Red Sea security, the crisis extends far beyond the trouble emanating from Yemen.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications