Though the February 2008 elections in Pakistan marked a fresh opportunity for democratic consolidation, many within Pakistan today are voicing concerns about the weakness of President Zardari's government. This event will bring together a panel of leading experts on Pakistan to debate the sustainability of Pakistan's democractic dispensation, and ways in which the international community, specifically the United States, can help guarantee Pakistan uninterrupted civilian rule.

The February 2008 elections marked a fresh opportunity for democratic consolidation in Pakistan. The Obama administration pledged support for the civilian government, and seemed committed to dispensing with the pro-Musharraf policy of preceding administrations. Two years later, however, concerns about the weakness of the Zardari government are heard loud and clear, despite the fact that his Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) government has achieved major successes in terms of constitutional reform and provincial empowerment. The Pakistani military, on the other hand, is believed to possess de facto control of Pakistan's security policy. Its image as an institution is on the rise within Pakistan, and its role in flood relief efforts is likely to reinforce this view.

Just how sustainable is Pakistan's democratic dispensation, and what can the international community, specifically the U.S., do to ensure uninterrupted civilian rule in Pakistan?

A panel of leading experts joined USIP to debate this question, examining three aspects of the present state of Pakistan's democracy: the evolution of the civil-military relationship since 2008 and where it seems to be headed; civilian economic and governance performance since the PPP government took over, and how that has, and likely will, impact Pakistan's political outlook; and the challenge of negotiating within Pakistan's civil-military relationship faced by the Obama administration and other global powers, and what this complex relationship means for long-term civilian supremacy in Pakistan.

Speakers

  • Moeed Yusuf, Moderator
    South Asia Adviser
    U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Mohammad Waseem, Panelist
    Professor at Lahore University of Management Sciences and Ford Foundation Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Institution
  • Shahid Javed Burki, Panelist
    Chairman of the Institute of Public Policy, Lahore, and former Finance Minister of Pakistan
  • Sheila Fruman, Panelist
    Pakistan Country Director, 2006-2010
    National Democratic Institute

Explore Further

  • Read the recent Peace Brief on the challenges Pakistan's recent flooding pose to the civilian government.

 

Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications