The Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir is experiencing its most severe domestic uprising since 1989. Despite the severity of the situation, very little is known about the nature of the present uprising and how it compares to previous ones. The U.S. Institute of Peace hosted a panel discussion on the present situation in Kashmir, and what impact the violence may have on Indian, Pakistani and American policy towards Kashmir.

Read the event analysis, Social Media Amplify Concerns in India’s Jammu and Kashmir State

The Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir is experiencing its most severe domestic uprising since 1989. While recent years delivered some good news through fewer militant attacks, relatively peaceful elections, and revival of the tourist industry, the current wave of protests has once again paralyzed the Kashmir Valley. More than 100 Kashmiris, predominately young men and boys, have died in clashes with Indian security forces since the protest began this summer. The state government has failed to regain control of the region, the Indian prime minister has expressed his shock at the unfolding situation in Kashmir, and the government seated in New Delhi has mentioned reviewing its security deployments and pushing for a political settlement.

Despite the severity of the situation, very little is known about the nature of the present uprising and how it compares to previous ones. The strategic aspect of the developments in Kashmir is equally important, not only for the Indian state but also for U.S. policy in the region. What, if any, lasting implications will the situation have on New Delhi's policy towards Kashmir, and by extension, on the India-Pakistan relationship? Furthermore, what does all this mean for the U.S. policy on the Kashmir dispute?

To discuss the present situation in Kashmir, USIP hosted a panel of three eminent speakers:

  • Rebecca Byerly, freelance journalist who has reported for Voice of America and has recently reported from Kashmir. She discussed the on-the-ground situation and the nature of the protests taking place in the troubled state.
  • Zubair Ahmed, a senior journalist with the BBC who has covered Indian Kashmir for two decades. He discussed the political situation in Kashmir and what this means for the future of Kashmir, and for New Delhi's relations with the state.
  • Ambassador Howard B. Schaffer, a retired U.S. Foreign Service Officer and presently a professor at Georgetown University. He analyzed the strategic implications of the situation in terms of India's role in South Asia, the India-Pakistan relationship, and most importantly, U.S. policy on Kashmir and towards India and Pakistan.
  • Moeed Yusuf, moderator
    South Asia Adviser for the U.S. Institute of Peace

 

Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications